Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It won't be the Rafale, but the N-LCA Mk. II. the Navy has stated it's firm requirement of of 43 N-LCA and 60 N-LCA Mk. II.yeh mat pucho rakhenge kaha, yeh pucho ki chalayega kaun (IN is short of officers & pilots)
The article clearly talks of additional 45 over and above 16+29 earlier & i think additional orders were always on card.
so in a decade or so IN now has:
90 mig 29ks + 60 NLCA + around 50-60 Rafale (not sure of this) so around 200 4.5 gen fighters
any link ....It won't be the Rafale, but the N-LCA Mk. II. the Navy has stated it's firm requirement of of 43 N-LCA and 60 N-LCA Mk. II.
These would be followed by N-AMCA which is confirmed due to considerable Naval funding in the program.......
i doubt this news as there has been no mention of it in the national media.
Will love to have Rafale-M.....
Since we are talking about carrier fighters, I want to know when will the construction of IAC-2 start, since now even the requirements are not given by the navy & we are talking about it's commissioning in 2017??
INS Vikramaditya and IAC-1 will accommodate around 60 Mig-29Ks while other 30s will be stationed in Goa naval air base as a replacement for maintenance and overhauling. IN is not repeating the mistakes it committed while acquiring Sea Harriers.
Russia and India according to finalize the delivery schedule, Russia will be delivered to India in 2012, more 40 m-17V-5 type of military transport helicopters, 21 Su-30MKI (signed in 2000, according to contract to license the assembly), 12 Su-30MKI (according to the 2007 supply contracts signed) and nine carrier-based fighter aircraft MiG -29K/KUB.
http://www.9abc.net/index.php/archives/72568
I would go for Rafale without a rethink.
But when we negotiate for EMALS they probably going to sell F35 and EMALS as a package.Same catch as with INS Vik.
But F35 can be very helpful for our future LPDs.
Part of the presentation showed a computer simulation which calculated that the F-35 would be consistently defeated by the Russian-made SU-35 fighter aircraft. The defeat calculated by the scenario also showed the loss of the F-35's supporting airborne-early warning and air-to-air refueling aircraft,
Independent air combat analysts from Air Power Australia have also stated that the F-35 is not capable of facing high end threats; that what will be delivered (if it ever arrives) will be obsolete; and that the F-35 is not affordable or sustainable.
http://www.f-16.net/news_article4416.html