Pakistani E
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 8, 2013
- Messages
- 7,059
- Reaction score
- 27
- Country
- Location
Prayers and peace to the Bohra community of Pakistan and the world on this blessed occasion. May you forever prosper. Ameen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
good luck with your view. head of wipro is a muslim , one of the biggest pharma is owned by muslim. Southern state of kerala which has more than
So pakistan was made for those who are currently known as muhajir in india !!India still is. The real issue for India was never the Muslim majority provinces of the Indus region. They could never have been "tamed" by India and could have broken off at any point post 1947. The real issue for India is the huge dispersed Muslim communties across mainland India where they form minority but still significant minority. That was the crux of the issue and that was not resolved by 1947 - that event only sorted the "Muslim majority region" problem.
.You have a point here but ,"Hindu Water "Muslim Water" echoed 70 years ago at Railway stations..One can imagine the deep rooted concern while unannounced will play the role in different scenarios..Imagine the Sikhs mostly low cast converts too but you will find them everywhere..I am not too sure whether these are consequence of other issues rather then being Muslim. In other words could being Muslim just be be a symptom of something deeper? For instance the Christians in Pakistan are at bottom of the pile. That is nothing to do with Christianity. Look at the worlds most advanced block - the West. It is all Christian.
The reason why Christians are at bottom of the socio-economic ladder in Pakistan is attendant to their past. They were dalit or unitiuchable or lower order Hindoos who converted to Christianity. Their low social station was just transferred to being Christian. Could this be the case for many Indian Muslims also?
There should have been mini partitions as well in 1947. Bangladesh and other areas where Muslims formed a majority although the I don't think that was many places.India still is. The real issue for India was never the Muslim majority provinces of the Indus region. They could never have been "tamed" by India and could have broken off at any point post 1947. The real issue for India is the huge dispersed Muslim communties across mainland India where they form minority but still significant minority. That was the crux of the issue and that was not resolved by 1947 - that event only sorted the "Muslim majority region" problem.
The West is post Christian.I am not too sure whether these are consequence of other issues rather then being Muslim. In other words could being Muslim just be be a symptom of something deeper? For instance the Christians in Pakistan are at bottom of the pile. That is nothing to do with Christianity. Look at the worlds most advanced block - the West. It is all Christian.
The reason why Christians are at bottom of the socio-economic ladder in Pakistan is attendant to their past. They were dalit or unitiuchable or lower order Hindoos who converted to Christianity. Their low social station was just transferred to being Christian. Could this be the case for many Indian Muslims also?
We are quite happy that it dint become another middle east. In fact even our enemy chinese would be happy having us as neighbor rather than a muslim country. But any way it was elitist muslims who claimed that they are different from us and seeing the events around the world that is certainly true. Would thank Jinnah for saving India for eternity.
Being shia's bohras would certainly favor India over other countries in south asia.
That is the song your singing now. After the "bird flew" from the nest. In 1947 your people did everything to prevent the partition so please don't now colour it after the fact. My question is more directed to the "2NT" supporters. Did they get what they wanted?
I am not too sure whether these are consequence of other issues rather then being Muslim. In other words could being Muslim just be be a symptom of something deeper? For instance the Christians in Pakistan are at bottom of the pile. That is nothing to do with Christianity. Look at the worlds most advanced block - the West. It is all Christian.
The reason why Christians are at bottom of the socio-economic ladder in Pakistan is attendant to their past. They were dalit or unitiuchable or lower order Hindoos who converted to Christianity. Their low social station was just transferred to being Christian. Could this be the case for many Indian Muslims also?
Looking at it purely from Muslim POV the partition of 1947 was a unmitigated disaster for the community. It divided the muslim and left huge chunk open to abuse by Hindus. Indeed if the idea of partition was to secure Muslims of the sub-continent it had exactly the opposite effect. The splintered Bohra community is reminder of this.
2NT died stillborn.
Of course you know that.
you have no idea how bohras have flourished in India. Sometimes i wonder why can all Muslims be like them. We have lived together and prospered.
Died and reincarnated from its vegetative state, you know, thanks to the Sanghi, pro Hindutva government in India today.
2 NT actually never died even with the creation of B'desh. B'desh is still a predominantly Muslim state and and that was the idea behind the creation of a separate homeland.
They have flourished in just about any corner of the world they live. In Pakistan too they are prosperous, something to do with their strong 'one community' concept and belief.
yes totally agree my respect for Islam just increased by leaps and bounds when i was a part of a friends wedding. They were just too good people to believe even existed.
For the obvious reason that they are first and foremost human beings. If you, Navtrek became Navtrek Husssain, or Navtrek David, or Navtrek Singh would the essential Navtrek become another person?you have no idea how bohras have flourished in India. Sometimes i wonder why can all Muslims be like them. We have lived together and prospered.
There never was "2NT" in the first place. What we had was "XNT". X= Many nations. 1971 confirmed that and it also killed the "1NT" as in one nation. Bangla did not coalesce back with India thus validating the "XNT".2NT died stillborn.
Same can be said about Pakistan also. In 1971, before the "bird flew", the educated Pakistanis, the 1971 equivalent of today's PDF members, may have wanted to prevent disunion of West and East Pakistan. And now the current generation of Pakistanis are saying, "Good riddance. East Pakistan was a burden." Although Pakistani soldiers had used the "Getting rid of burden" line then itself immediately within days after the war ended.That is the song your singing now. After the "bird flew" from the nest. In 1947 your people did everything to prevent the partition so please don't now colour it after the fact. My question is more directed to the "2NT" supporters. Did they get what they wanted?
And that 'X' in XNT was simply X=3. Nothing more, nothing less.There never was "2NT" in the first place. What we had was "XNT". X= Many nations. 1971 confirmed that and it also killed the "1NT" as in one nation. Bangla did not coalesce back with India thus validating the "XNT".