No need for to quote excerpts without reading the whole post. The evidence that India is involved in state level support for terrorism is overwhelming. That it isn't presented at this point in time is a separate issue and has multiple possible explanations - not least that in real due process, the prosecution will not show their hand to the defence until they're confident of conviction. Let's catch the filth first.
In one broad sweep, you've assumed said "counterintelligence" is not intended to bring harm to Pakistan. This is where your complaint collapses because Pakistan has a different stance on Indian consultancy firms in this theatre - that they are malevolent towards Pakistan until proven otherwise.
Pakistan may have as many stances as a Kathak dancer; it convinces nobody except the breath-takingly audacious member of PDF who makes bland posts turning the world upside down. Lord Cornwallis would have recognised the tune, possibly - due to his later stint in India - even the stances.
On the basis of available evidence of past conflicts between our nations, this stance is logical and justified.
On the basis of the track record of the two nations in Afghanistan, it is precisely the opposite. A whole parade of senior and very senior officers have gone on record bragging about their involvement in a spectrum of activities ranging from aiding and abetting Islamists to fighting side by side with them in their insurrection or in their terrorist campaigns.
There is not a single instance, not one instance, of an Indian doing these things. Even the single, solitary instance manufactured out of whole cloth by a notorious intelligence agency is widely acknowledged to have been forcibly placed in a compromised position, similar to what might have been the fate of the consultants who were in Afghanistan.
One needs look no further than Indian "consultancy" of the mukthi bahini to comprehend such a default position.
Wrong example. The Mukti Bahini was trained by the BSF on how to use rifles, and not in anything else, not by any nebulous consultancy firm. No money passed hands. This is in contrast to the work of another intelligence agency who undertook to subvert the Indian state from 1966 onwards. This was testified to by the Pakistani officer, Brig. Z. A. Khan, in his memoirs, where he mentions meeting the Mizo insurgents in the CHD, and learning the details of their sponsorship and 'management'.
India can build confidence with Pakistan if it so wishes in order to reverse this position.
Pakistan can build confidence with India, and indeed, the whole world, if it so wishes. You need only to look up the damaging track record of the military historian about whom Shuja Nawaz waxed eloquent - 'magisterial', in his words about the great man's book - and also of dozens of his peers. That is not the track record on one track; it is about a man who had remitted cash sums to the conspirators of the 9/11 conspiracy and, having done so, was sitting at lunch with American government persons. He did not bother with any intermediate stages; he was directly a financier of terrorism, using government of Pakistan finance.
Hiring more "independent counterintelligence consultants" in third party nations is not the way to achieve that though.
Ah, I think you should save your judgements for the proven and established 'non-state actors' recognised by every single civilised nation in the world - including, very prominently, the nation whose flag you display.
Please don't bother to respond. I have no intention of engaging in outrageous inversions of reality with such a blatantly unscrupulous member.
