What's new

39% of Americans polled want Crescent tattoos on Muslims to differentiate

It's difficult not to be open minded and guarded with 39% statistics are already favoring a Muslim holocaust. That just leaves 12% more Americans who if fall over to their side would mean a majoritative support to lynch Muslims in America.

Hopefully it would've been thought provoking. It provoked many in us :D
 
.
easy there tiger... or cheetah...

In essense you could've just said, "Adux you misunderstood me, I was pointing out a deeper agenda". What you said has a very strong possibility of being right but it would carry a whole lot more meaning if it comes from a calm cool guy.

There is a 10 second delay between the caller and what goes on air if this gentleman wanted to make a point he could have easily sensor what 39% were saying and announce at the end the results of biggots.

but i see your point.:oops:
 
.
AND YOU SHOULD GET a brain scan.i have said to u before take you language skills and shove it up your a--.i made it clear to u before if u **** enough not to under stand the politics then u shouldnt responce.i dont care for you language skills.
the demage was done once he let the cat out of bag.the objective is achived here.
he wanted to float the idea out and he did just that.obviously u so stupid that flew right over your head.
if he wanted to no it so bad why didnt he come up with tags for jews.
i have listen to these idiots all over usa.and there tactics any small thing that ever happens in muslim countries they make sure its known all over the usa .thats called creating hatred.but with in the limits.then through out an idea like that and at the end saying MY BAD I just wnated to check.i didnt really mean it.objective achived.do u really thing those hillbillys are going to care what he said after words.obviously u havent dealt with any.

i repeat i dont care for your language skills enghindi or what ever u wanna call it .if u cannot counter it i suggest dont bother.Talk radio is a propogenda.and nothing but.if he would have done this against the jews.regardless of reason he would have been fired.he did this against the muslims and because of the hate laws Radio station will lose there operating license for spreading hate openly.so cover that he came back with JUST CHECKING.i didnt really mean it.bla bla bla

Everything is a conspiracy isnt it!!!!!, Read keyroze's post..

God help us
 
.
And they dont censor stuff over there...why should he censor it cuz it will make great news and improve his ratings....i can only comprehend whats written in the article not his mind. maybe he saw the change in soceity like all of us have our own trend-o-meter, decided to bring it out in the open. Be poltically incorrect and by which he could show people their own prejudice and insecurity, show how people like OBL are winning

In india jounralist do something called a sting operation, they offer bribe to politicans, cops etc and take it on a hidden camera...i see this one in the same lines. entrapment, if you will

It all throws upon light to the ones who seek it, ie simply put, a rational american slowly would think what he and his country is changin into the monster they stopped in america. It shows them a path of self realization,
From a social standpoint it shows up the effect extremist like OBL has on ordinary moderate americans, slowly turnin them into extremist themseleves.
 
.
It doesn't have to be a large conspiracy. Let's just introduce a new idea.

If 39% have been found in Agreement, I'd say give it another 5 yrs for the remaining 12% to form the majority.
 
.
Ok that is a fair question......

1)I would answer that the poll would depend on the area where it was taken. New York will be different to Texas for example.

2)If we ignore the above for a minute and THEORISE that the statistics are accurate. Then the point could be made that the numbers MAY have actually decreased since 9-11 (We have no base figure to compare to) And they may decrease rather than increase.

3)If a radio show host can make this point (Not to mention The antics of the guy who plays Borat in the eponymous film) then may be other people (In the U.S.) will look at their way of thinking and realise how dangerous ideas can be. Plus outsiders will also point these things out to them as often as possible.
 
.
Muslim-American Group Targets Radio Host Over Koran Oath Comments - AP

WASHINGTON — A Muslim-American advocacy group has called on radio talk show host Dennis Prager to be removed from the governing board of the federally funded U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum after Prager last week blasted a representative- elect for planning to use the Koran at his swearing-in next month.

Prager, who is Jewish, slammed Minnesota Democrat Keith Ellison, the first Muslim to be elected to the U.S. Congress, after Ellison announced he plans to have his oath of office photo taken with the Koran instead of the Christian Bible, which is traditional.

"Insofar as a member of Congress taking an oath to serve America and uphold its values is concerned, America is interested in only one book, the Bible," he wrote in a column titled, "America, Not Keith Ellison, Decides What Book a Congressman Takes His Oath On."

"If you are incapable of taking an oath on that book, don't serve in Congress," Prager wrote, adding that using the Koran "undermines American civilization. "

The Washington, D.C.-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) issued a statement Monday calling for Prager's ouster from the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council, the museum's advisory council.

"No one who holds such bigoted, intolerant and divisive views should be in a policy-making position at a taxpayer-funded institution that seeks to educate Americans about the destructive impact hatred has had, and continues to have, on every society," CAIR wrote in its letter to the museum council's president, Fred Zeidman.

"As a presidential appointee, Prager's continued presence on the council would send a negative message to Muslims worldwide about America's commitment to religious tolerance," CAIR wrote.

Prager was not immediately available for comment. Museum spokesman Andrew Hollinger told FOXNews.com that he had not yet spoken with Zeidman and could not comment on the letter.

Prager is one of 52 council members, not including 10 House and Senate members and five ex-officio members. Hollinger said each council member is appointed by the White House to serve on the museum's governing board. The federal government pays for about 60 percent of the museum's annual budget.

Last week, the Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish advocacy group, called Prager's opinions "flat-out wrong," as well as "intolerant, misinformed and downright un-American. "

"If Prager were merely a blogger and radio talk-show host trying to be relevant and provocative, these views might not merit a response. But as a newly appointed member of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council, Prager and his views must be held to a higher standard," the group said.

Ellison's chief of staff, Kari Moe, said Friday "the criticism is being flamed by the politics of division that were rejected in the '06 election cycle."

She also said the tradition of using the Bible relates to the photo-op ceremony for individual lawmakers that follows the official swearing-in of all members of Congress together on the House floor. At the official oath of office, newly elected members raise their right hands.

After that explanation, Prager said the ceremonial oath is no less significant than the actual swearing-in.

"Oh, that's the whole point. It's exactly because it's ceremonial that it matters to me," he said. "Ceremonies matter. Ceremonies are exceedingly important. That is the way a society states what is most significant to it."

Prager also said that he would like to see Jews swear their oaths of office on the Christian Bible — the Jewish Bible does not include the New Testament that is central to Christian beliefs.

Prager said he doesn't think Ellison should serve if he does not take the oath on the Bible but he doesn't prefer legislative action be taken to prevent him from serving.

Speaking last week with FOX News, Prager said his feelings have nothing to do with Ellison's being a Muslim.

"It has to do with the fact that it's not the Bible," he said. "If a Mormon-American decided to substitute the Book of Mormon for the Bible, I would have the same problem. If a scientologist wanted L. Ron Hubbard's 'Dyanetics' to be the book, I would have a problem," Prager said.

Prager said the Bible is the most important book in American history and that's why it should be used.

"George Washington began this movement. He was the one to bring a Bible and swear on it. Every president except one, Teddy Roosevelt, because it was right after the assassination of James McKinley and they didn't have time for a Bible. And every president has done this," Prager said, adding that congressional members have followed the tradition.

FOXNews.com' s Greg Simmons and the Associated Press contributed to this report.
 
.
It doesn't have to be a large conspiracy. Let's just introduce a new idea.

If 39% have been found in Agreement, I'd say give it another 5 yrs for the remaining 12% to form the majority.

Maybe, or 39% can also get halved, the world might become a better place, all extremist and the paranoid leaders of the world will cease to exist....
 
.
Ok that is a fair question......

1)I would answer that the poll would depend on the area where it was taken. New York will be different to Texas for example.

2)If we ignore the above for a minute and THEORISE that the statistics are accurate. Then the point could be made that the numbers MAY have actually decreased since 9-11 (We have no base figure to compare to) And they may decrease rather than increase.

3)If a radio show host can make this point (Not to mention The antics of the guy who plays Borat in the eponymous film) then may be other people (In the U.S.) will look at their way of thinking and realise how dangerous ideas can be. Plus outsiders will also point these things out to them as often as possible.
That's true. But a state like NY is a lot more anti-Muslim than the typical redneck racist mindset of Texas :)

We're dead either way.

But yeah that's true. Northern Virginia's a nice place, compare that to Maryland, rest of Virginia, West Virginia, Indiana and they freak out seeing a Muslim.

After 9/11 there wasn't a Muslim in most of Parts of America who didn't know someone or the other in their circles who had been shot at by random people on the streets.

Adux, as the correction of Muslim extremists has to come from within the Muslims the correction of American extremists has to come from within Americans.
 
.
That's true. But a state like NY is a lot more anti-Muslim than the typical redneck racist mindset of Texas :)

We're dead either way.

But yeah that's true. Northern Virginia's a nice place, compare that to Maryland, rest of Virginia, West Virginia, Indiana and they freak out seeing a Muslim.

I have been to the remotest redneck places one can imagine where some people still haven’t traveled outside the 10 mile radius from their homes. And I can gladly state, that not once I’ve experienced even a racist glare. If anything, I have found hillbillies to be refreshingly hospitable. :banana2:

However, it’s quite the opposite storey in metropolitans.
 
.
Maybe, or 39% can also get halved, the world might become a better place, all extremist and the paranoid leaders of the world will cease to exist....

But half of 39% is almost 20%, where as the majority requires a 12% jump only. Which figure is achievable dear? :chilli:
Kashif
 
.
I have been to the remotest redneck places one can imagine where some people still haven’t traveled outside the 10 mile radius from their homes. And I can gladly state, that not once I’ve experienced even a racist glare. If anything, I have found hillbillies to be refreshingly hospitable. :banana2:

However, it’s quite the opposite storey in metropolitans.
Saw the rodeo scene in the movie Borat?

DC is quite fine these days along with move of Northern Virginia... Very few white people there :D
 
. .
We should understand one thing.The 39% statistic is for only those ppl who listen to that particular radio channel in one particular area of the USA.That too is limited to the ppl who actually decided to call him up.We cant apply that to the whole of america. A more comprehensive survey is reqd. for that IMHO.
 
.
We should understand one thing.The 39% statistic is for only those ppl who listen to that particular radio channel in one particular area of the USA.That too is limited to the ppl who actually decided to call him up.We cant apply that to the whole of america. A more comprehensive survey is reqd. for that IMHO.


true, the sample is way too small compared to the whole of america especially when you will defenitly see trend differences along the geography
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom