What's new

26Th Feb Was A Test Run By IAF To Check The Fight In The Paf:---

.
Hi,

That is a surprising news---since when did they close it---?
There was a news about it few days back
And even if it's how can you say Qureshi is behind it you think he is more influential than army and air force generals
 
. . .
You should not sound so proud to show how illiterate you are---.

This manner of probing has been tried and tested over centuries by warring factions---.

It amazes me how shamelessly you kids show off how illiterate you are---.

So, what is your literate conclusion about 2nd world war, was Hitler using the same strategy LOL
 
.
Hi

The 26th was the test run by india to see the reaction of the Paf---.

Why do you think they planted that French Scorpene submarine in pakistani waters---why did they have their aircraft carrier planted in pakistani waters---.

Why did they have so many SU30---in the air and none fired a missile at Paf aircraft---.

It was all a pre-planned test run by the indians to see pakistani air force reaction---how far the Paf will go---.

That what that fake smart bomb strike by the iaf aircraft was on trees---.

It was all staged as a precursor for the main act to follow on a different date---.

The indians got their answers loud and clear---Paf does not have the ballz to take out what was offered on a platter---.

Paf backed out to take out all that were put right in front of them---.

That was the answer India wanted to know---how far they would go---.

If the Paf had taken all that was presented---india would not have had the ballz to do what it did with kashmir---.

They were just testing the level of craziness in the Paf---which just deflated like a balloon that had sprung a leak---.

@Khafee @Irfan Baloch @Mangus Ortus Novem

They should seriously fire the current Air Chief and appoint you instead.
 
.
Hi

The 26th was the test run by india to see the reaction of the Paf---.

Why do you think they planted that French Scorpene submarine in pakistani waters---why did they have their aircraft carrier planted in pakistani waters---.

Why did they have so many SU30---in the air and none fired a missile at Paf aircraft---.

It was all a pre-planned test run by the indians to see pakistani air force reaction---how far the Paf will go---.

That what that fake smart bomb strike by the iaf aircraft was on trees---.

It was all staged as a precursor for the main act to follow on a different date---.

The indians got their answers loud and clear---Paf does not have the ballz to take out what was offered on a platter---.

Paf backed out to take out all that were put right in front of them---.

That was the answer India wanted to know---how far they would go---.

If the Paf had taken all that was presented---india would not have had the ballz to do what it did with kashmir---.

They were just testing the level of craziness in the Paf---which just deflated like a balloon that had sprung a leak---.

@Khafee @Irfan Baloch @Mangus Ortus Novem
What load of crap sir there was no Indian subs in PAKISTANI waters but International water near to our EEZ, their aircraft carrier in Pakistani waters but in Indian waters (near to gujrat) , MKI- is not firng their BVR for resons they have less ranges compare to AMRAAM C-5 (100 km vs 80 Km), so you want to Pakistan all IAF jets on 26/27 FEB and enter nuclear war with India @MastanKhan :crazy::crazy::crazy:
 
.
They should seriously fire the current Air Chief and appoint you instead.

Hi,

Sarcasm aside it does not work that way---. The chief is there for a reason---but is there civilian consideration in parallel which is not god worshipping the Paf---?

See---that is what the problem seems to be over here---. There---seemingly is no capable civilian for advice and oversight---now that would be a job that would be interesting---.
 
.
Hi,

Sarcasm aside it does not work that way---. The chief is there for a reason---but is there civilian consideration in parallel which is not god worshipping the Paf---?

See---that is what the problem seems to be over here---. There---seemingly is no capable civilian for advice and oversight---now that would be a job that would be interesting---.

Because thats how pakistan is run, everything that a man in uniform does is "right" whereas a bloody incompetent civilian is good only for a secondary role in "decision making".
 
.
@MastanKhan

Sir on the third day after you posted, I see what you see. 26Feb was indeed a test run to see what Paksitan can and could do in response to a military adventure from India.

What has changed in my mind is simple, India orchestrated an Incident in Kashmir and instead of using any pressure tactics, it went straight to crossing the international border and dropping bombs which it could've dropped staying in its own territory/airspace. India violated international border to test waters on Pakistan side on purpose. Conducting a military operation after unsubstantiated allegations was a big logical jump and a response that was too harsh and too risky. Their test showed they were incapable - but their test was designed to understand Pakistan's response knowing what they were going to do later in Kashmir.

So thank you, we are enlightened by you.
 
.
Hi,

Sarcasm aside it does not work that way---. The chief is there for a reason---but is there civilian consideration in parallel which is not god worshipping the Paf---?

See---that is what the problem seems to be over here---. There---seemingly is no capable civilian for advice and oversight---now that would be a job that would be interesting---.
And Don'tb lame PAF always PAF runs under the supervision of Civil govt, if Civilian govt want to deescalate/diffuse situation, PAF had/have/will have to obey Civilian govt order, commander in chief of Pakistan armed forces is PM of Pakistan, if want to stop, Pakistani military should obey his order @MastanKhan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
@MastanKhan

Sir on the third day after you posted, I see what you see. 26Feb was indeed a test run to see what Paksitan can and could do in response to a military adventure from India.

What has changed in my mind is simple, India orchestrated an Incident in Kashmir and instead of using any pressure tactics, it went straight to crossing the international border and dropping bombs which it could've dropped staying in its own territory/airspace. India violated international border to test waters on Pakistan side on purpose. Conducting a military operation after unsubstantiated allegations was a big logical jump and a response that was too harsh and too risky. Their test showed they were incapable - but their test was designed to understand Pakistan's response knowing what they were going to do later in Kashmir.

So thank you, we are enlightened by you.

Hi,

Thank you very much---and I appreciate the acknowledgement---.
 
.
Hi,

Sarcasm aside it does not work that way---. The chief is there for a reason---but is there civilian consideration in parallel which is not god worshipping the Paf---?

See---that is what the problem seems to be over here---. There---seemingly is no capable civilian for advice and oversight---now that would be a job that would be interesting---.

The Ministry of Defense and a civilian Prime Minister are there to provide oversight and decision to engage.
 
.
The Ministry of Defense and a civilian Prime Minister are there to provide oversight and decision to engage.

Hi,

Thank you---And both of them know diddley about fighter aircraft and technology---.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom