What's new

26/11: Tahawwur Rana's verdict weakens India's case against ISI

why dont u tell us what happened?? all i can see is talking without proof or evidence.

The proofs you talking about is not going to make any difference ... No matter how much proofs India gives you on 26/11 it will not stand in your courts ... Its logical i can understand ... I also understand that the stand India took on 26/11 will not benifit India in any way ... India is just foolings its public with the trial of 26/11 and so is pakistani authorities to Indian authorities ... i personally dont know why waste so much time and energy by India when it is expected that nothing will happen ...

The matter is India is convinced who did 26/11 ,, Why we have to prove that in pakistani courts???
We know what actions will be taken ,, why pursue with the case???
 
.
Show us ISI is involved, or else you are spreading and believing the conspiracy theories. Simple is that

Dude, India didn't sue the ISI in the court of US, it was by the people and the agencies of US. India had no idea about Rana, until he was blamed in US. We didn't know about David Headley also, but still he's blaming ISI. Had Rana been proved guilty in US then it would have been an advantage for us, and since he's not proved then there's nothing that India have to lose. But you people are celebrating as if you won the world cup!

As for Baluchistan, Indian agencies are not sued in the court of any other country! So your blame on India on this subject is nothing but an airless balloon!

And conspiracy theories? You've got to be kidding me man! Check this following link and let me know if you don't understand something.



www.defence.pk/forums/current-events-social-issues/113624-conspiracy-theories-abound-pakistan.html
 
.
no one has anything to loose or gain except the hawks in india. they now have less material which they could possibly use to drag ISI in the mumbai attacks.

and also many here were literally waiting for the US court to link Rana to mumbai attacks so they could change their gears while bashing ISI.


they went into fourth gear and unfortunately the gear went into reverse crushing them :rofl:
 
.
The proofs you talking about is not going to make any difference ... No matter how much proofs India gives you on 26/11 it will not stand in your courts ... Its logical i can understand ... I also understand that the stand India took on 26/11 will not benifit India in any way ... India is just foolings its public with the trial of 26/11 and so is pakistani authorities to Indian authorities ... i personally dont know why waste so much time and energy by India when it is expected that nothing will happen ...

The matter is India is convinced who did 26/11 ,, Why we have to prove that in pakistani courts???
We know what actions will be taken ,, why pursue with the case???



gentleman same is the case as for u as in Baluchistan off topic but fits here........as far as 26\11 .........dear match box...cigrates.....and toffee rapers are not evidence....... dont give me the links of wikileaks.......do some research on it and u will know that it is CIA's own parallel channel....some truth..........major lies........ but to understand my point one have to come out of arrogance and hatred......... think positively and you will get the answers...... ask investigative journalists and u will see the truth.....
 
.
bwahahahah and by "you" you mean US courts also who dint see any proof.


anyway the verdict has proves Indians lies cant even crawl on its back.


the is closed . period.

Please read the post # 47 and stop your BS!
 
.
will be interesting to see how much of what headly has claimed can be proved in the court.....

There u have it "sir" , how much can be proved is the question. I don't think anything will be proved, what could be proved from 90's till now regarding kashmir?? nothing the same goes here. Hell even when Osama was captured in Abottabad people talk that the military or the state of Pakistan is in no way complicit in the matter even though it was a military area. I think everybody "concerned" can sit back take a sip at coke with popcorn, its only the over jealous with rage trying to grope in the dark.
 
.
gentleman same is the case as for u as in Baluchistan off topic but fits here........as far as 26\11 .........dear match box...cigrates.....and toffee rapers are not evidence....... dont give me the links of wikileaks.......do some research on it and u will know that it is CIA's own parallel channel....some truth..........major lies........ but to understand my point one have to come out of arrogance and hatred......... think positively and you will get the answers...... ask investigative journalists and u will see the truth.....

So my dear friend what type of evidence does actaully pakistan wants ? Now India dont have their passport to prove their identity.. there cannot be any evidence in such cross border terrorism cases there can only be facts ...
 
.
So my dear friend what type of evidence does actaully pakistan wants ? Now India dont have their passport to prove their identity.. there cannot be any evidence in such cross border terrorism cases there can only be facts ...

Brother, even if the ISI admits that they were involved in the Mumbai attacks, they'll still not believe it.

Lets see it in OBL case, even if the GoP and the ISI did not deny about OBL being present in that mansion, some guys believe that its a so called conspiracy theory. they are in the big time denial mode...noone can help them!
 
.
I never believed in this drama from day one. This law, chargesheet, case, verdict bullcrap doesn't apply to terrorism that was seen in Mumbai. There are only three laws that apply here: catch. extract. kill. ISI found a willing lab rat in Kasab and party, succeeded in its mission and is sitting tight. USA cannot drag its feet too long with Pakistan due to strategic and waste of time reasons. I blame the UPA for not being tough with FBI on getting Headley to India.
 
.
So my dear friend what type of evidence does actaully pakistan wants ? Now India dont have their passport to prove their identity.. there cannot be any evidence in such cross border terrorism cases there can only be facts ...

Mmmmmuaaah, since there cant be any evidence as ISI was not involved, and You dont have evidence, therefore you want to send your own dirty linen to Pakistan for washing, just bcaz your hatred towards Pakistan and ISI. keep living with the dramas your Raw gave you.
 
.
India may seek further access to Headley in U.S.
India will take a decision on seeking further access to Lashkar operative David Headley in the U.S. after perusing the complete judgement of a Chicago court which acquitted Tahawwur Rana of charges of being involved in Mumbai terror attacks.

Official sources said on Sunday that once the details of the decision of the jury comes out, the sleuths of National Investigation Agency (NIA) will have parleys with experts of international law and decide the future strategy in this case.

U.S. state department spokesman Mark Toner had said in Washington that U.S. would consider giving India further access to Headley, a Pakistani-American, who has pleaded guilty in 26/11 attack, for questioning by its investigating agencies once New Delhi makes such a request.

NIA which is investigating the case against Headley, Rana, a Pakistani-Canadian and others had decided to wait for the proceedings to conclude in the Chicago court before filing a charge sheet against the accused.

The agency has also sought certain documents and evidence that were produced in the U.S. court and expects to receive them.

After examining the verdict in the U.S. court and after reviewing the documents and evidence that it expects to receive, NIA will take a decision on filing a charge sheet against Headley, Rana and others in an Indian court, official sources said.

NIA registered a case against Headley and his accomplice Rana to probe their role in various terror strikes in the country, including the Mumbai attack, on November 12, 2008.

The duo was booked under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and for conspiring to wage war against the country.

“We have said in the past we’ve granted that access (to Headley) and, you know, obviously there was the trial that took place, but in the future we would consider providing that access again,” Toner had said.

Headley has pleaded guilty to 12 terrorism charges, including his involvement in the November 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai that killed 166 people. The American-born Lashker terrorist was also a witness in the trial of Rana, who was acquitted by a Chicago court in the Mumbai attack case on June nine.

50-year-old Rana was convicted of one count of conspiracy to provide material support to theterrorism plot in Denmark and one count of providing material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization LeT.

Rana faces a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison on the two counts combined and remains in federal custody without bond. No sentencing date was set.

India has already expressed disappointment over the acquittal of Rana by a U.S. Court on the count of conspiracy to provide material support to the Mumbai attacks.

“Government has taken note of the verdict announced by a U.S. District Court in the Tahawwur Hussain Rana case following the finding by the jury that Rana was guilty on two of three counts. Rana has been found guilty on one count of ’conspiracy to provide material support to the terrorism plot in Denmark’ and on one count of ‘providing material support to the Lashkar e Tayyiba (LeT)’.

”...We are, therefore, disappointed that Rana was acquitted on the count of conspiracy to provide material support to the Mumbai terrorist attacks. However, it must be remembered that Rana was tried in a U.S. court in accordance with U.S. law. Criminal trials in the U.S. are jury trials and there are special rules governing such jury trials,” Government had said in its first reaction after the verdict.
The Hindu : News / National : India may seek further access to Headley in U.S.

Main na manooo ray....
 
.
So my dear friend what type of evidence does actaully pakistan wants ? Now India dont have their passport to prove their identity.. there cannot be any evidence in such cross border terrorism cases there can only be facts ...

The facts are that the militants have demonstrated time and again through highly sophisticated and complex attacks in Pakistan against the GHQ, naval base, ISI HQ's, training academies etc. that they have the training and capacity to perpetrate attacks like Mumbai. The equipment used in all of these attacks is easily available in the market, open or black.

The facts are that Headley has clearly stated that he was not aware of the real identities of the individuals he claims were ISI/PA agents/officers, and no evidence has been provided so far to credibly establish the identity of these people alleged to be ISI/PA agents.

The facts therefore clearly do not automatically implicate the ISI/PA or any other institution of Pakistan in the Mumbai attacks.
 
.
Mmmmmuaaah, since there cant be any evidence as ISI was not involved, and You dont have evidence, therefore you want to send your own dirty linen to Pakistan for washing, just bcaz your hatred towards Pakistan and ISI. keep living with the dramas your Raw gave you.

I also dont like Indian admistration way of going about this case because we know we cannot achieve anything in this case...

The thing that we ourself have been satisfied that ISI was involved and whose master plan it was should be enough for India... India should not expect anything from pakistan ..
 
.
I also dont like Indian admistration way of going about this case because we know we cannot achieve anything in this case...

The thing that we ourself have been satisfied that ISI was involved and whose master plan it was should be enough for India... India should not expect anything from pakistan ..

dont expect. and indains are no saint. your state govt had been involved in state terrorism against east Pakistan. period.

this is case is over. your all lies fell flat on face
 
.
dont expect. and indains are no saint. your state govt had been involved in state terrorism against east Pakistan. period.

this is case is over. your all lies fell flat on face

Well the world knows which country promoted terrorism as a policy against its neighbours
 
.
Back
Top Bottom