What's new

25 years of economic reforms: From super-beggar to potential superpower

Ryuzaki

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
3,158
Reaction score
-12
Country
India
Location
Netherlands
This is a silver jubilee to remember. The economic reforms launched by PV Narasimha Rao in July 1991 have transformed India so much that it’s difficult to recall how bad things used to be.

Back in 1991, lndia pretended to be a Third World leader. In fact, its development model evoked derisive laughter among many developing countries that had grown twice as fast. They found Indians good at drafting resolutions in international meetings, but little else.

Today, India is called a potential superpower by journals ranging from Forbes to The Guardian. India is called the only Asian power that can check China in the 21st century. This is why the US arranged for its entry into the nuclear club and now backs it for a permanent seat in the UN Security Council.

In 1991, India was a member of the G77 group of developing countries. In 2016, India is a proud member of the G20, the most-powerful countries in the world.

In 1991, India was infamous as the world’s biggest beggar, a bottomless pit for foreign aid. It soaked up 40% of the funds of the International Development Association (IDA), the soft-loan window of the World Bank. Today, India is as much a donor as a recipient.

It is still a substantial aid recipient in gross terms. But the inflow is barely half-a-billion dollars net of debt service. Meanwhile, India itself has become a substantial donor, including a line of credit of $10 billion to Africa, $2 billion to Bangladesh.

Remittances from NRIs total $73 billion a year, and foreign direct and portfolio investment often exceed $60 billion per year. Commercial loans exceed $35 billion. India now finances itself overwhelmingly on commercial terms, not through aid.

Its per capita income has shot up from $375 in 2011 to $1,700 today, taking it from low-income to middle-income status. However, China is almost six times better off, and has transformed itself far more than India.

Forward March

In 1991, the Indian economy was immaterial to the world. Today, in purchasing power parity terms, India is the third-largest economy in the world after China and the US. It has overtaken all European economies and Japan.



India today is the fastest-growing major economy in the world, touching 7.6% in 2016 after a similar rate in 2015. Against expectations, India has overtaken China. The World Economic Outlook of the International Monetary Fund portrays the US and India as two pillars holding up a wobbling world economy.

India was historically an economic laggard. For decades it grew at just 3.5% per year, derisively called the ‘Hindu rate of growth’. This accelerated in the 1980s to 5.5%, because of creeping liberalisation plus an unsustainable borrowing spree that was ended in tears in 1991. India then embarked on economic reforms in 1991.

All Opposition parties denounced this as a sell-out to the IMF, and predicted that India would suffer a “lost decade” of growth, just as Africa and Latin America had in the 1980s. In fact, India accelerated to become a miracle economy, averaging 8% growth after 2003.

India Rising

Critics say economic reforms have benefited only a thin rich layer. Dead wrong. Between 2004 and 2011, a record 138 million Indians were raised above the poverty line. China was earlier hailed for raising 220 million people above the poverty line between 1978 and 2002.

India’s rate of poverty reduction was much faster. Arvind Panagariya and Vishal More have shown that poverty among Dalits and Muslims fell faster than for all communities.

Before 1991, India begged for food aid if the monsoon failed. When it suffered two successive droughts in 1965 and 1966, mass starvation was avoided only by US food aid. India lived a ‘ship-to mouth’ existence.

William and Paul Paddock’s famous 1967 book, Famine 1975! claimed the world was running out of food, so food aid should be conserved for viable countries, and unviable ones like India should be left to starve.

The Green Revolution changed that, and private seed production further improved productivity after 1991. India suffered two successive droughts in 2014 and 2015. Yet this time, it remained a net food exporter. It became the world’s largest rice exporter in 2014.

In 1991, it took years to get a telephone landline. Today, India has a billion cellphones, instant availability and the cheapest telecom rates in the world. Even people below the poverty line have phones. In 1991, only 20% of Indians had a TV set. Now two-thirds do. In 1991, Doordarshan had a TV monopoly. Today, the country has over 900 TV channels.

Many flaws still remain. Thousands of projects remain stuck in red tape. All government services remain lousy. Corruption, waste and sloth are visible everywhere. Education and health remain deplorable. Indian institutions are low-quality, weak and subservient to political interference.

The police-judicial system is moribund, with a backlog of 31million cases. The future agenda must include much better governance, better social services and high-quality, independent institutions. But for now, let us toast the silver jubilee of economic liberalisation.

http://blogs.economictimes.indiatim...ms-from-super-beggar-to-potential-superpower/
 
. . .
Critics say economic reforms have benefited only a thin rich layer. Dead wrong. Between 2004 and 2011, a record 138 million Indians were raised above the poverty line. China was earlier hailed for raising 220 million people above the poverty line between 1978 and 2002.

India’s rate of poverty reduction was much faster. Arvind Panagariya and Vishal More have shown that poverty among Dalits and Muslims fell faster than for all communities.

The biggest achievement. More and more oppressed people are getting empowered to live lives of dignity so long after political independence.

The absolute poverty rate in India may be lower than 10% now if we are to believe a World Bank study (which said it was 12.4% in 2011 under a better measuring system)

Its per capita income has shot up from $375 in 2011 to $1,700 today, taking it from low-income to middle-income status.

The number is wrong for 2011. PPP per capita is much more important anyway.
 
.
You got to have "FAITH" believing in "ONESELF" goes a long way
Oh btw, is it only me, whenever i surf PDF, it freeze often?
 
. .
http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/dan-gardner-the-nation-killing-famine-that-never-was

Dan Gardner: The nation-killing famine that never was


When I hand the worn and faded book to the old man, he smiles. He remembers it well.

He is professor Monkombu Sambasivan Swaminathan. Little-known in this country, Swaminathan, 85, is a legend in Asia. He is the scientist who brought the Green Revolution to India in the 1960s and in doing so he likely saved tens of millions of people from starving to death. Maybe hundreds of millions. He may even have saved India itself.

The book in his hands is Famine 1975! It was a hugely influential best-seller in 1967. “This is Paul and William Paddock,” Swaminathan grins. The Paddocks argued that mass global famine was inevitable. It was “foredoomed,” as they put it. Efforts to avoid it — efforts like Swaminathan’s — would fail. “They said Indians, and others, were like sheep going to the slaughterhouse. They’ll all die.”

The Paddocks were wrong and Swaminathan was right, a fact that was established long ago. But this is not ancient history. The story of how Malthusians like the Paddocks were certain that mass starvation would sweep the world, and destroy nations like India, is an important reminder to beware experts who are sure they know what the future will bring. It’s also an important warning for decision-makers: Excessive confidence can be extremely dangerous.


Today, it’s often thought that concerns about soaring populations and mass starvation started with Paul Ehrlich’s famous 1968 bestseller The Population Bomb. They didn’t. All through the 1950s and 1960s, fear rose as rapidly as the number of people. The population crisis made the cover of Time magazine in 1960. And in 1967, U.S. president Lyndon Johnson called it the second greatest threat facing the world, after nuclear war.

How could a world of four, five, or even six billion people feed itself? By the time Famine 1975! was published in 1967, countless experts had become convinced it could not. “All serious students of the underdeveloped nations agree that famine among the peoples of the underdeveloped nations is inevitable,” wrote biologist James Bonner in a review of Famine 1975! published in the prestigious journal Science.

That sense of inevitability was critical. If the catastrophe were merely possible, but not certain, the best response may be to pour resources into stopping it. But if it is certain to happen anyway, that would be foolish.

Paul and William Paddock understood the logic. They denounced the Green Revolution as an inevitable failure. Instead, they proposed “triage”: Rich countries should stop sending food aid to countries that were doomed and instead direct it to those who at least had a chance of averting tragedy. And which countries were doomed? At the top of everyone’s list was India.

In The Population Bomb, Paul Ehrlich praised the Paddocks and passionately endorsed “triage.” A few years later, the head of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences did the same.

The Paddocks were under no illusions about what “triage” would do. India was on the knife’s edge. Whole regions lived “ship-to-mouth” on Western food aid. Cut aid off and “immediate turmoil and possible catastrophe” would result, the Paddocks wrote. In effect, it would cause the very famines they predicted.

They were at least right about that, says Swaminathan, who was in Ottawa to give a lecture at the International Development Research Centre. “It would have been a terrible tragedy,” he says. Small wonder that Norman Borlaug “couldn’t stand the name Paul Ehrlich,” Swaminathan says.

Fortunately, “triage” was never implemented. In 1968, Swaminathan’s work caused the country’s wheat harvest to soar from 12 to 17 million tons. In 1970, Norman Borlaug, “the father of the Green Revolution,” whose work Swaminathan adapted for India, won the Nobel Peace Prize.

When fears of starvation surged again in 1973 and 1974 — thanks to soaring oil prices and regional crop failures caused by bad weather — Ehrlich published The End of Affluence. Once again, he declared India doomed. With luck, it might stagger on to the end of the century, Ehrlich wrote, “but the train of events leading to the dissolution of India as a viable nation is already in motion.”

In 1975, India did well enough to decline all foreign food aid. And it never looked back. Today, India is an emerging global power.

That is not all there is to the story, however. In the 1980s and 1990s, as food surpluses grew, governments cut funding to agricultural research and rural development. The threat that once seemed so vivid receded in memory. It came to seem inevitable that the Green Revolution would succeed, that there would be no global famine, that the world would have plenty to eat. So why worry about food production? “There was a spirit of complacency,” Swaminathan says.

In 2008, soaring food prices caused riots. The phrase “food crisis” returned to headlines for the first time in a generation. And governments scrambled to restore funding — hoping to make up for decades of lost progress.

The problem then and now is overconfidence. As I discuss in my new book, Future Babble, psychologists have amply demonstrated that people tend to be far too confident in their judgments. And so, in a world where essentially nothing is certain or inevitable, people often declare themselves “certain” that something is “inevitable.” And they make very bad decisions as a result.

The solution is to temper confidence with humility. And not to reward overconfident fools. Unfortunately, we struggle with both these points.

In 1994, the United Nations Environment Program made a joint award of its prestigious Sasakawa Prize to two men: Monkombu Sambasivan Swaminathan and Paul Ehrlich. The UN said Swaminathan won for feeding India; Ehrlich won for raising the alarm on population growth. It apparently escaped the judges’ notice that Ehrlich had not only made numerous false predictions during the crisis, he had urged a course of action which would have undermined Swaminathan’s work. And doomed millions to starvation.

Swaminathan only grins when I mention the award. He is too gentlemanly to be critical. “It puzzled me,” he says with a laugh.

Postmedia News

Dan Gardner is a columnist for the Ottawa Citizen.
 
Last edited:
.
@Manas

The great man's daughter today heads ICMR.

soumya-swaminathan-dg-of-icmr.jpg


I have seen that brains run in the genes.
 
.
This is a silver jubilee to remember. The economic reforms launched by PV Narasimha Rao in July 1991 have transformed India so much that it’s difficult to recall how bad things used to be.

Back in 1991, lndia pretended to be a Third World leader. In fact, its development model evoked derisive laughter among many developing countries that had grown twice as fast. They found Indians good at drafting resolutions in international meetings, but little else.

Today, India is called a potential superpower by journals ranging from Forbes to The Guardian. India is called the only Asian power that can check China in the 21st century. This is why the US arranged for its entry into the nuclear club and now backs it for a permanent seat in the UN Security Council.

In 1991, India was a member of the G77 group of developing countries. In 2016, India is a proud member of the G20, the most-powerful countries in the world.

In 1991, India was infamous as the world’s biggest beggar, a bottomless pit for foreign aid. It soaked up 40% of the funds of the International Development Association (IDA), the soft-loan window of the World Bank. Today, India is as much a donor as a recipient.

It is still a substantial aid recipient in gross terms. But the inflow is barely half-a-billion dollars net of debt service. Meanwhile, India itself has become a substantial donor, including a line of credit of $10 billion to Africa, $2 billion to Bangladesh.

Remittances from NRIs total $73 billion a year, and foreign direct and portfolio investment often exceed $60 billion per year. Commercial loans exceed $35 billion. India now finances itself overwhelmingly on commercial terms, not through aid.

Its per capita income has shot up from $375 in 2011 to $1,700 today, taking it from low-income to middle-income status. However, China is almost six times better off, and has transformed itself far more than India.

Forward March

In 1991, the Indian economy was immaterial to the world. Today, in purchasing power parity terms, India is the third-largest economy in the world after China and the US. It has overtaken all European economies and Japan.



India today is the fastest-growing major economy in the world, touching 7.6% in 2016 after a similar rate in 2015. Against expectations, India has overtaken China. The World Economic Outlook of the International Monetary Fund portrays the US and India as two pillars holding up a wobbling world economy.

India was historically an economic laggard. For decades it grew at just 3.5% per year, derisively called the ‘Hindu rate of growth’. This accelerated in the 1980s to 5.5%, because of creeping liberalisation plus an unsustainable borrowing spree that was ended in tears in 1991. India then embarked on economic reforms in 1991.

All Opposition parties denounced this as a sell-out to the IMF, and predicted that India would suffer a “lost decade” of growth, just as Africa and Latin America had in the 1980s. In fact, India accelerated to become a miracle economy, averaging 8% growth after 2003.

India Rising

Critics say economic reforms have benefited only a thin rich layer. Dead wrong. Between 2004 and 2011, a record 138 million Indians were raised above the poverty line. China was earlier hailed for raising 220 million people above the poverty line between 1978 and 2002.

India’s rate of poverty reduction was much faster. Arvind Panagariya and Vishal More have shown that poverty among Dalits and Muslims fell faster than for all communities.

Before 1991, India begged for food aid if the monsoon failed. When it suffered two successive droughts in 1965 and 1966, mass starvation was avoided only by US food aid. India lived a ‘ship-to mouth’ existence.

William and Paul Paddock’s famous 1967 book, Famine 1975! claimed the world was running out of food, so food aid should be conserved for viable countries, and unviable ones like India should be left to starve.

The Green Revolution changed that, and private seed production further improved productivity after 1991. India suffered two successive droughts in 2014 and 2015. Yet this time, it remained a net food exporter. It became the world’s largest rice exporter in 2014.

In 1991, it took years to get a telephone landline. Today, India has a billion cellphones, instant availability and the cheapest telecom rates in the world. Even people below the poverty line have phones. In 1991, only 20% of Indians had a TV set. Now two-thirds do. In 1991, Doordarshan had a TV monopoly. Today, the country has over 900 TV channels.

Many flaws still remain. Thousands of projects remain stuck in red tape. All government services remain lousy. Corruption, waste and sloth are visible everywhere. Education and health remain deplorable. Indian institutions are low-quality, weak and subservient to political interference.

The police-judicial system is moribund, with a backlog of 31million cases. The future agenda must include much better governance, better social services and high-quality, independent institutions. But for now, let us toast the silver jubilee of economic liberalisation.

http://blogs.economictimes.indiatim...ms-from-super-beggar-to-potential-superpower/
Relatively true, if you look at standards of metrics used a closed economy is always poor as per western economists.
Because they measure you by how much you are useful to them. More dollars ( default western metric) you have greater the power. Now this metric & evaluation ways can be manipulated suit their needs.

I dont believe in percentile growth rates/PPP they are ridiculous form of measuring a economy (more attuned towards catering to western neo-colonialist mindset). I do remember that we could buy more for a rupee in 1991 than in 2016. As the article rightly points out at the fag end, governance should improve and growth should be inclusive.

Lets not confuse motion for progress.
 
. .
Congratulation to our Indian friends for transforming from "SUPER BEGGAR" to "SUPERPOWER" in just 25 years
You have come a long long way:super:

We were never super beggar. From whom did we beg?

Yes, we have come a long way and we are on a right path.
 
. . .
Read the title of the thread please buddy, its never my words to begin with
so what is more important

1.how bad were your conditions 25 years back ?

2. how are you doing right now and what is your future strategy ?

please do enlighten us with you high IQ sir :coffee:
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom