What's new

2015 SCS Islands/Reefs Compare Map controlled by four nations, Amazing ~!

The Philippines needs to seriously develop the islands that they have. I hope the AFP invites the JSDF to help develop their assets. :)

To land the fighters they don't have? To dock the war ships that can't leave their ports? Japan is welcome to do anything it wants, in the end all China has to do is to top it, and looking at our current situation, that's not a tall order at all. 100+ billion in the Asian development funds, I'm sure we can spare some to compete.

Besides, developing islands is not particularly hard, the Philippines can do it, if they had the use for it, the political will, the money. The know how and technology is the least they need. This is essentially grunt work.

Let me to show some awesome here, 2015.5 South China Sea islands/reefs controlled by China/ Vietnam/ Philippines /Malaysia.

In 2015 SCS, N.o1 & N.o2 & N.o3 biggest-size islands belong to China artificial islands.:pop:
( 4456 x 2718 pic, click to see satellite photos ... PSed & translated by cnleio :partay: )
View attachment 222264
I am underwhelmed by this, how can we not have the top 10 islands in this chart, very underwhelmed. That Malaysian and Taiwan island are big enough to land fighters.
 
.
Do you want to borrow some commas or periods for tirade?

here they are: , , , , , . . . . . . . , , , . take however many you think you need.

Thanks but i know you always have price list somewhere or maybe part undisputed disputed claims

To land the fighters they don't have? To dock the war ships that can't leave their ports? Japan is welcome to do anything it wants, in the end all China has to do is to top it, and looking at our current situation, that's not a tall order at all. 100+ billion in the Asian development funds, I'm sure we can spare some to compete.

Besides, developing islands is not particularly hard, the Philippines can do it, if they had the use for it, the political will, the money. The know how and technology is the least they need. This is essentially grunt work.


I am underwhelmed by this, how can we not have the top 10 islands in this chart, very underwhelmed. That Malaysian and Taiwan island are big enough to land fighters.

We are i mean Pagasa island municipality has been getting their annual funding funding from the national government being a local government but am worred about the military outpost your imperialist forces have been harrasing our outpost so we have to send supplies mostly by air or brave small ships to past through the imperial blockades but now the you imperials are building airfields i guess we have to assign figther escorts and our allies should do the same.
 
.
Just two years ago, someone told me China will build the city in SCS ... i ever thought that's a crazy idea & kidding me, now im the joker ! :partay: When China using PLAN A to build those artificial islands, also prepare PLAN B to protect our interests in SCS. :coffee:

This's a new "38th parallel north" of SCS, China's baseline.


The use of 38th parallel is very unwise, bro.
 
.
The use of 38th parallel is very unwise, bro.

You didn't reply to me. Is it me, or have you suddenly in past few months turned more hostile to China?

Also, what is the kind of deal that you would want with China to make amends. (Forget the history issue for a moment)

Next, don't you think it is in your interest that you make amends with China as soon as you can, as time seems to be against Japan, and in favor of China.
 
.
Hopefully the Philippines can get its act together and invest massively in a naval fleet and beef up its control of the islands under its control and those that fall under its EEZ. Japan and the United States should provide full support to the Philippines.

As much as I am pro-Chinese, I just cannot condone Chinese actions in the South China Sea as a matter of objectivity. China MUST follow the United Nations' mandated Law of the Seas.
 
.
Let me to show some awesome here, 2015.5 South China Sea islands/reefs controlled by China/ Vietnam/ Philippines /Malaysia.

In 2015 SCS, N.o1 & N.o2 & N.o3 biggest-size islands belong to China artificial islands.:pop:
( 4456 x 2718 pic, click to see satellite photos ... PSed & translated by cnleio :partay: )
View attachment 222264

the left 3 shapes look like a silkworm, a cheetah and a wild goose correspondingly. :D

Hopefully the Philippines can get its act together and invest massively in a naval fleet and beef up its control of the islands under its control and those that fall under its EEZ. Japan and the United States should provide full support to the Philippines.

As much as I am pro-Chinese, I just cannot condone Chinese actions in the South China Sea as a matter of objectivity. China MUST follow the United Nations' mandated Law of the Seas.

What's the United Nations' mandated Law of the Seas anyway?

China claims SCS soveriegn according to the Law of Point of Origin , the single most potent law of all - China has owned SCS for 1,000s of years, before most of these modern "Nation State" around were even established.

At a time, no "Vietnam", no "Pinoy", no "Malaysia", No "Indonesia", etc, let alone post 1980's "Law of the Seas" , which neither China nor the US is a signatory/ or signatory with a condition that doesn't cover any soveriegn issue.

Talk to China using the United Nations' mandated Law of the Seas ? :omghaha:

 
Last edited:
.
the left 3 shapes look like a silkworm, a cheetah and a wild goose correspondingly. :D



What's the United Nations' mandated Law of the Seas anyway?

China claims SCS soveriegn according to the Law of Point of Origin , the single most potent law of all - China has owned SCS for 1,000s of years, before most of these modern "Nation State" around were even established.

At a time, no "Vietnam", no "Pinoy", no "Malaysia", No "Indonesia", etc, let alone post 1980's "Law of the Seas" , which neither China nor the US is a signatory/ or signatory with a condition that doesn't cover any soveriegn issue.

Talk to China using the United Nations' mandated Law of the Seas ? :omghaha:

don't lie.

Over 2,000 year ago. There is Jiao Zhi Sea of Jiao Zhi (Vietnamese) people. :coffee:

giao chi gioi.png
 
.
What's the United Nations' mandated Law of the Seas anyway?

China claims SCS soveriegn according to the Law of Point of Origin , the single most potent law of all - China has owned SCS for 1,000s of years, before most of these modern "Nation State" around were even established.

At a time, no "Vietnam", no "Pinoy", no "Malaysia", No "Indonesia", etc, let alone post 1980's "Law of the Seas" , which neither China nor the US is a signatory/ or signatory with a condition that doesn't cover any soveriegn issue.

Talk to China using the United Nations' mandated Law of the Seas ? :omghaha:



I am not going to get into silly arguments with juveniles here regarding silly claims of '1000s of years'. When you say stuff like that, don't expect the other side to take you seriously. The modern Westphalian state of 'China' did NOT exist in those '1000s of years' that you are referring to. Even the word 'China' originates from Sanskrit and Persian languages.

Saying China has existed for '1000s of years' is like saying present day Iran has existed for thousands of years as Persia or that present day Egypt has existed for a thousands of years. Or the ludicrous claim that Indians like to make that India has existed for 2000+ yrs..

Just like there was no 'Vietnam', no 'Philippines', no 'Malaysia', no 'Indonesia', similarly there was NO "People's Republic of China". Your argument that 'China' existed before 'modern nation states' is ludicrous nonsense. Who had more claim to China? The Yuan Dynasty? The Ming Dynasty? The Qing Dynasty? WHO?

The Qing Dynasty is considered by most historians to have been able to hold on to territory from 1644 to 1912 which represents present-day China. One wonders, when did Chinese literature start referring to the current geographical landmass of China as 'China' or the various peoples living within those geographical confines started to refer to themselves as 'Chinese.

Now you are most welcome to go to bed with whatever wet dreams help you sleep, but that doesn't change the facts I have stated above.

The following UN Convention on the Law of the Seas is applicable to China, if the Chinese government thinks it is unfair, we welcome China to fight it in the International Court of Justice or withdraw from the United Nations

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:
.
Oh please stop beating a dead horse already its in the courts so shut it! fool! your childlish rants have no bases like your claims your just finding hard to admit that you people just piss off a lot of countries with your constant imperialism as for me being member of the elite as if you know me personally! stop embarrassing yourself your brainless rants show us evidence of your arguments real original authentic logical evidence or insults and rants are all you chinese good at?

PHOTOS: U.S. Marine Now in Filipino Custody After Protests Over Trans Woman's Murder | Advocate.com

Wow, US marine has such special privilege for a murders suspect that they can stay under US custody, looks like Pinoy didnt have much authority in their homeland?


Philippine Commandos Killed in Raid Over Suspected Terrorist - WSJ

US Played 'Big Role' in Botched Philippine Raid

Poor filippine commando who died becos of US foolish advise and even your own people like Zero_wing do not care much about your perish. He is more concern abt inviting US imperialist to fulfil his evil dream.
 
. . . .
the left 3 shapes look like a silkworm, a cheetah and a wild goose correspondingly. :D
China is building 3x Monster Islands in SCS.:bunny:

BTW 1st biggest island - Mischief Reef (3.1sq.km) is too big to add into the compare map :cry:, only used a scaled-down satellite photo :whistle:, not 1:1 scale compared with other islands/reefs, rests all r 1:1 scale vs each other.:smart:

Just do a count Chinese creating 8.2 sq.km lands (3.1+2.68+2.4) in SCS ... lol ! :partay: that's so CRAZY.

The use of 38th parallel is very unwise, bro.
I mean the islands built by China, not the sea. Now let's watch the show ... whether U.S.A can stop China's artificial islands in SCS ... if not, those islands will become bigger and more "SCS Casino" installed on them.:coffee:
 
Last edited:
. .
PHOTOS: U.S. Marine Now in Filipino Custody After Protests Over Trans Woman's Murder | Advocate.com

Wow, US marine has such special privilege for a murders suspect that they can stay under US custody, looks like Pinoy didnt have much authority in their homeland?


Philippine Commandos Killed in Raid Over Suspected Terrorist - WSJ

US Played 'Big Role' in Botched Philippine Raid

Poor filippine commando who died becos of US foolish advise and even your own people like Zero_wing do not care much about your perish. He is more concern abt inviting US imperialist to fulfil his evil dream.

Question was the relationship between your post and topic being discussed answer nothing your just trolling again you neo nazi s bags proves once again that your liers d bags and arrogant racist bigots who cant even respect other people when did the philippine became filippine you chinamen are just full of crap enjoy your 50cent per post d bag




I am not going to get into silly arguments with juveniles here regarding silly claims of '1000s of years'. When you say stuff like that, don't expect the other side to take you seriously. The modern Westphalian state of 'China' did NOT exist in those '1000s of years' that you are referring to. Even the word 'China' originates from Sanskrit and Persian languages.

Saying China has existed for '1000s of years' is like saying present day Iran has existed for thousands of years as Persia or that present day Egypt has existed for a thousands of years. Or the ludicrous claim that Indians like to make that India has existed for 2000+ yrs..

Just like there was no 'Vietnam', no 'Philippines', no 'Malaysia', no 'Indonesia', similarly there was NO "People's Republic of China". Your argument that 'China' existed before 'modern nation states' is ludicrous nonsense. Who had more claim to China? The Yuan Dynasty? The Ming Dynasty? The Qing Dynasty? WHO?

The Qing Dynasty is considered by most historians to have been able to hold on to territory from 1644 to 1912 which represents present-day China. One wonders, when did Chinese literature start referring to the current geographical landmass of China as 'China' or the various peoples living within those geographical confines started to refer to themselves as 'Chinese.

Now you are most welcome to go to bed with whatever wet dreams help you sleep, but that doesn't change the facts I have stated above.

Now this person who makes sense fate humanity restored!

The following UN Convention on the Law of the Seas is applicable to China, if the Chinese government thinks it is unfair, we welcome China to fight it in the International Court of Justice or withdraw from the United Nations

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom