What's new

2014.12 China Navy already own 23x DDGs + 65x FFGs, PLAN warship list

@english_man

One of them is the '152' :-)
17083126722632600685.jpg
2304223P1-0.jpg


'152' is READY !
17382425700934472417.jpg
 
. .
This is good. Multi polar world ensures balance of power which in turn ensures peace in the world. Some one should update the wiki with these latest info.
 
.
Ten years ... im sure China need 10x years time, there will be 40+ modern DDGs (above 052C) and 40+ modern FFGs (above 054A), DOUBLE warships in PLAN military ports. :happy:

W020131106309910777089.jpg

11-130G1105137.jpg
 
.
China is lacking some A/C's ....
i hope to see 2 A/C before 2020 in PLAAN ..
She also lack LHD. I dont know why they keep delaying and delaying the construction. LHD is more versatile than carriers for power projection and humanitarian assistance. Yes, LHD may lack the firepower of carrier wings. But given the lack of clash between major power. Smaller intensity warfare for China is more possible and gunship fitted onboard these LHD can gives them decent power projection firepower. While LHD is able to land heavy armour and marines unlike CV who cant do that.

China needs to quickly build at least 2 LHD bigger than the Mistral class, something like Juan Carlos

juan-carlos-i.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
She also lack LHD. I dont know why they keep delaying and delaying the construction. LHD is more versatile than carriers for power projection and humanitarian assistance. Yes, LHD may lack the firepower of carrier wings. But given the lack of clash between major power. Smaller intensity warfare for China is more possible and gunship fitted onboard these LHD can gives them decent power projection firepower. While LHD is able to land heavy armour and marines unlike CV who cant do that.

China needs to quickly build at least 2 LHD bigger than the Mistral class, something like Juan Carlos

View attachment 161595

yeah you made a good point , China should have LHD's along with Carriers ...but so far what i see that China focus on his DDG's and Sub fleet , and even one A/C with good DDG's in Battle group can do a lot more damage , and so far Chinese Subs are all AIP which makes them real quite ...
but i think China should give more attention to A/C and LHD after 2016 or more maybe ...
because without proper cover , any A/C is nothing but sitting ducks
 
.
My personal thinking, compared current PLAN warships rank with World of Tank. :partay::partay::partay:

  • 053H-class FFG (28x) == BT-2
20100606163851-1260916009.jpg


  • 051-class DDG (6x,1 retired) == KV
185737326334.jpg


  • 056-class covettes (16x) == T-34-76
rdn_4e190a340b0c8.jpg


  • 056A-class covettes (2x with towing anti-sub sonar, more building) == T-34-85
2541349_T34-85_thumb.jpg


  • 054-class FFG (only 2x) == IS-I
2982509050133434134.jpg


  • 054A-class FFG (20x) == IS-2
36-13041G9240O59.jpg


  • 052C-class DDG (6x) == IS-3
xinsrc_2220705230932546224118.jpg


  • 052D-class DDG(2x, many building in shipyard) == IS-4
2659881_IS-4_2.jpg


  • 055-class DDG (unknow numbers, prepare for building) == IS-7
4.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
1. No '152' commissioned pic yet, but news said 5th 052C '152' had joint PLAN East Sea Fleet in 2014.6.27
View attachment 159748

2. Correct. One 051 DGG N.o163 "NanChang / 南昌" retired in 2010.03, now only still 6x 051 in PLAN. It's 1st DDG named by my hometown city, as far as i knew next years a new 052D will name "NanChang / 南昌" again.

Yes.......'cnleio'..........i had seen that someone had added a commissioning date for 052C '152', on wiki............BUT where did they get that from?......as there has been no information from Chinese websites that this event has occurred. Though it does appear to be long overdue, if '152' hasnt joined the fleet, as the vessel has been completed with its pennant number now for several months. Also the last vessel in class '153' must be due also to join the fleet soon...........maybe the Chinese Navy is not in a rush to find and train crews for these vessels.
Also, some of the latter 054A Frigates are taking longer than the earlier vessels in class to commission.
Basically, 2014 has seen many 056 Corvettes join the fleet...........but not Destroyers and Frigates. :confused:
 
.
She also lack LHD. I dont know why they keep delaying and delaying the construction. LHD is more versatile than carriers for power projection and humanitarian assistance. Yes, LHD may lack the firepower of carrier wings. But given the lack of clash between major power. Smaller intensity warfare for China is more possible and gunship fitted onboard these LHD can gives them decent power projection firepower. While LHD is able to land heavy armour and marines unlike CV who cant do that.

China needs to quickly build at least 2 LHD bigger than the Mistral class, something like Juan Carlos

View attachment 161595
I think China has a new 20,000 LPD project like France Mistral-class
842a8131jw1drtpx7v6tlj.jpg
202220_384.jpg
202228_438.jpg


Yes.......'cnleio'..........i had seen that someone had added a commissioning date for 052C '152', on wiki............BUT where did they get that from?......as there has been no information from Chinese websites that this event has occurred. Though it does appear to be long overdue, if '152' hasnt joined the fleet, as the vessel has been completed with its pennant number now for several months. Also the last vessel in class '153' must be due also to join the fleet soon...........maybe the Chinese Navy is not in a rush to find and train crews for these vessels.
Also, some of the latter 054A Frigates are taking longer than the earlier vessels in class to commission.
Basically, 2014 has seen many 056 Corvettes join the fleet...........but not Destroyers and Frigates. :confused:
It's Okay, maybe they take a long time to train new crews on new 052C/D and 054A, PLAN need thousand new crews coz recent years many 052C/D and 054A built by CSSC. Anyway new warships finished, when join Navy is just a time problem.



I have no idea, why my later post always add into this one ?
There's a problem in PDF, new post always add into former post ... very bad, i don't know why ?
=================================================

There'r 2014.12 PLAN warships:

053H-class FFG, 28x
053H1 FFG
752fd357td628b8384fee&690.jpg

053H2 FFG
01300539031165139680732127201.jpg



051-class DDG, 6x 1 retired
original version 051 DDG
109421979756700.jpg

modern update 051 DDG
051 ddg.jpg



051B-class DDG, 1x
051B_02.jpg



051C-class DDG, 2x

051C.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
056-class Covettes, 16x
3288861_995733.jpg



056A-class Covettes (anti-sub), 2x
001vc7u8gy6EpPd6AAHf3&690.jpg



054A-class FFG, 2x
054 ffg.jpg



054A-class FFG, 18x & 2x new sea trial
054A ffg.jpg



052-class DDG, 2x
052_02 ddg.jpg



052B-class DDG, 2x
052B_02.jpg



052C-class DDG, 5x & 1x new sea trial
052C_01.jpg



052D-class DDG, 1x & 1x new sea trial
052D_02.jpg

more 052D here =)
052D_03.jpg



Russia 956E/M-class DDG, 4x
rus 956EM.jpg





 
Last edited:
. .
problem with chinese navy is there are not enough land base for Naval expansion.

Its easy to say you want 50+ destroyer, its easy to build themtoo, but where do you find dock for them is another problem.

Ships need resupply, and they cannot be underway forever, China only have 2 giant naval base and 4 to 6 resupply base in between their single coastline. Either in tsingtao or hainan is deep enough to support carrier operation.

Unless Chinese Navy develope a large underway resupply force, or starting to get new base somewhere You can build 50 destroyer and 60 frigate, but you would have no space to dock it..

@cnleio is there any plan for PLAN to have permanent base outside China
 
.
problem with chinese navy is there are not enough land base for Naval expansion.

Its easy to say you want 50+ destroyer, its easy to build themtoo, but where do you find dock for them is another problem.

Ships need resupply, and they cannot be underway forever, China only have 2 giant naval base and 4 to 6 resupply base in between their single coastline. Either in tsingtao or hainan is deep enough to support carrier operation.

Unless Chinese Navy develope a large underway resupply force, or starting to get new base somewhere You can build 50 destroyer and 60 frigate, but you would have no space to dock it..

@cnleio is there any plan for PLAN to have permanent base outside China

I dont think PLAN is going to build a navy as large as US. It just the media hype. China learn from US mistake, that is not too have a navy which appetite too big. The USN fleet eats up lots of military budget.

I think we may go for only 14DDG (Type 052C/D) and opt for 14 Type055 cruiser and 36 Modern frigate plus 3 CV and LHD will be a navy strong enough but not a big money guzzler.
 
. .
problem with chinese navy is there are not enough land base for Naval expansion.

Its easy to say you want 50+ destroyer, its easy to build themtoo, but where do you find dock for them is another problem.

Ships need resupply, and they cannot be underway forever, China only have 2 giant naval base and 4 to 6 resupply base in between their single coastline. Either in tsingtao or hainan is deep enough to support carrier operation.

Unless Chinese Navy develope a large underway resupply force, or starting to get new base somewhere You can build 50 destroyer and 60 frigate, but you would have no space to dock it..

@cnleio is there any plan for PLAN to have permanent base outside China

Nansha island has a new base looks good for first overseas permanent base
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom