What's new

2010-2020: Pakistan's Lost Decade

RiazHaq

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
6,611
Reaction score
70
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States


Until 2010, Bangladesh was a laggard in South Asia region. Its per capita income was about half of Pakistan's. Now Bangladesh has surpassed Pakistan as the Pakistani economy has suffered significant slow-down from the previous decade. In fact, the Pakistan economy grew at the slowest rate in South Asia as reflected in per capita incomes. While Pakistan's per capita income more than doubled from $500 to $1,000 in the ten years 2000 to 2010, the growth has slowed to less than 30% from 2010 to 2020.



Return on money invested in Pakistani stock market has also been cut in half in 2010-2020 when compared with the return in 2000-2010.

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/PAK/pakistan/exports

Pakistan's exports doubled from $10 billion to $20 billion in years 2000-2010. In the last decade 2010-2020, the nation's exports have grown only about 25% to $25 billion. Exports have declined in terms of percentage of the country's GDP from 13% to 10% in the most recent decade.



Foreign direct investment (FDI) in Pakistan ramped up in 2000-2010, reaching the peak of $5.6 billion (3.67% of GDP) in 2007. FDI inflow has since suffered a steep decline.

Shares of companies making up the Karachi Stock Exchange 100 index have returned 8% in US$ terms in 2010-2020, less than half of the 20% during 2000-2010 period. KSE100 still managed to achieve 14% return over the 20-year period from 2001 to 2021, among the highest in the world.



Pakistan has also seen a major decline in the rate of human development growth in the country over the last decade. Pakistan saw HDI (Human Development Index) growth of 1.4% in 2000-2009 and 0.80% in 2010-2019, according to Human Development Indices and Indicators 2018 Statistical Update. The fastest growth in Pakistan human development was seen in 2000-2010, a decade dominated by President Musharraf's rule, according to the latest Human Development Report 2018.

Bangladesh surpassing Pakistan in socioeconomic indicators has brought into sharp focus the contrast between Pakistan's decades of 2000-2010 and 2010-2020.What changed? The biggest change is Bangladeshi leader Shaikh Hasina's decision to stifle the unruly Opposition and the media to bring political and economic stability to the South Asian nation of 160 million people. It has eliminated a constant sense of crisis and assured investors and businesses of continuity of government policies. With development taking precedence over democracy, Shaikh Hasina followed the example of Asian Tigers by focusing on export-led economic growth of her country. She incentivized the export-oriented garment industry and invested in human development. Bangladesh now outperforms India and Pakistan in a whole range of socioeconomic indicators: exports, economic growth, infant mortality rate, primary school enrollment, fertility rate and life expectancy.

Bangladesh's garment exports have helped its economy outshine India's and Pakistan's in the last decade. Impressed by Bangladesh's progress, the United Nations’ Committee for Development Policy has recommended that the country be upgraded from least developed category that it has held the last 50 years.

The next challenge for Bangladesh is to move toward higher-value add manufacturing and exports, as Vietnam has done. Its export industry is still overwhelmingly focused on garment manufacturing. The country’s economic complexity, ranked by Harvard University’s Growth Lab, is 108 out of the 133 countries measured. That is actually lower than it was in 1995, according to the Wall Street Journal.



Vietnam ruled by autocrats is rapidly becoming an Asian Tiger. With rising manufacturing costs in China and the US-China trade war, many major manufacturers are relocating to other countries in Asia. This situation has helped Vietnam emerge as a hub of foreign direct investment (FDI). FDI flow into the country has averaged more than 6% of GDP, the highest of any emerging economy. The country’s recent economic data shows a rise of 18% in exports, with a 26% jump in computers/components exports and a 63% jump in machinery/accessories exports. These figures have earned Vietnam the moniker of the newest "Asian Tiger".



It was in 2007 that Pakistan caught the "democracy" fever led by the lawless lawyers of Lahore. This led to the return of corrupt dynastic rule of Asif Zardari and then Nawaz Sharif. The year 2007 also marked the beginning of yet another lost decade that saw Pakistan's per capita gdp's continuing lag behind South Asia region and other emerging economies.


Pakistan was the original "Asian Tiger" back in the 1960s when other developing Asian economies sought to emulate its development model. It became an export powerhouse in the 1960s when the country's manufactured exports exceeded those of Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia combined. The creation of major industrial estates in Karachi under President Ayub Khan's industrial policy incentivized industrial production and exports of value added manufactured products such as textiles. Now the country's industrial output lags its neighbors'.


With Chinese looking to relocate some of their industrial production to low-cost countries, Pakistan has a golden opportunity to grow its industrial output and exports again. Here's Karen Chen explaining why:

“Vietnam is too crowded already and moved into automobiles and electronics. There is no space for investment in Vietnam. Myanmar doesn’t have infrastructure. India is terrible. In Bangladesh you don’t have right conditions for setting up fabric units. So Pakistan is the ideal location for such garment manufacturing because of abundance of cheaper labour. The investment and tax policies for SEZs and new projects are also good. We’ve confidence to be at here.”

Seizing the opportunity to attract export-oriented investors will help Pakistan become the next Asian Asian Tiger economy. It will help the country avoid recurring balance-of-payments crises that have forced the nation to seek IMF bailouts with all their tough conditions. Focusing on "Plug and Play" Special Economic Zones (SEZs) is going to be essential to achieve this objective.

Related Links:
Haq's Musings

South Asia Investor Review

Pakistan's Debt Crisis
Declining Investment Hurting Pakistan's Economic Growth
Brief History of Pakistan Economy
Can Pakistan Avoid Recurring IMF Bailouts?

History of Pakistan Business and Industry

CPEC Financing: Is China Ripping Off Pakistan?

Pakistan's Lagging Industrial Output

Pakistan is 5th Largest Motorcycle Market

"Failed State" Pakistan Saw 22% Growth in Per Capita Income in Last 5 Years

CPEC Transforming Pakistan

Pakistan's $20 Billion Tourism Industry Boom

Home Appliance Ownership in Pakistani Households

Riaz Haq's YouTube Channel

PakAlumni Social Network


 
.
The 2010 floods and the administrations by the PPP and PML-N, along with the spill over of the war from the west didn't help things. You can can me a PTI supporter all you want (rhetorical statement, not directed at anyone) but macroeconomic reforms and regaining the public’s trust are key to getting the political capital to make the tough changes that will be unpalatable. If the Afghan war ends and some stability is achieved in Afghanistan, PM Khan could claim a hand in his advocacy of dialogue, and may gain the political capital in certain parts of society to make more reforms.

One thing that PML-N did, which was a double edged sword, but on the whole their greatest legacy was getting China interested enough in Pakistan via CPEC. Managing the debt (from CPEC and past borrowing) is part of what’s creating a drag on the economy. The double edge sword of this debt is that financing may be hard to come by in the near future, and a bird in hand is worth two in the bush.

the forty years of war next door doesn’t help economic growth, and unless global support can be assured to create a soft landing after western forces withdraw, Afghanistan will be a basket case on Pakistan’s door and a pull on our resources if Pakistan is forced to deal with the subsequent spillover.

Pakistan has had a lot of challenges over the past ten years, it’s was inevitable Bangladesh would surpass Pakistan and India on a GDP per capita basis and Pakistan in raw exports.

The 2020s will have to be the decade Pakistan caught up.
 
Last edited:
.
I see you are a very pro military rules, just be wise here, just look on the condition on Myanmar, just dont make any attempt to bring military rules again and you are living in US now, you will not face any consequences if that thing ever happen in Pakistan.....

And I see many Pakistani members here saying Pakistani military who lead many Pakistani institution and SOE is the main problem of mismanagement.....

Better see the cause and fix it, just dont try to seduce both Pak military and its supporters to make any coup again

And there are also unsuccessful authorian rule like North Korea, Myanmar, Venezuela, Cambodia, Laos
 
.
The 2010 floods and the administrations by the PPP and PML-N, along with the spill over of the war from the west didn't help things. You can can me a PTI supporter all you want (rhetorical statement, not directed at anyone) but macroeconomic reforms and regaining the public’s trust are key to getting the political capital to make the tough changes that will be unpalatable. If the Afghan war ends and some stability is achieved in Afghanistan, PM Khan could claim a hand in his advocacy of dialogue, and may gain the political capital to make more reforms.

One thing that PML-N did, which was a double edged sword, but on the whole their greatest legacy was getting China interested enough in Pakistan via CPEC. Managing the debt (from CPEC and past borrowing) is part of what’s creating a drag on the economy. The double edge sword of this debt is that financing may be hard to come by in the near future, and a bird in hand is worth two in the bush.

the forty years of war next door doesn’t help economic growth, and unless global support can be assured to create a soft landing after western forces withdraw, Afghanistan will be a basket case on Pakistan’s door and a pull on our resources if Pakistan is forced to deal with the subsequent spillover.

Pakistan has had a lot of challenges over the past ten years, it’s was inevitable Bangladesh would surpass Pakistan and India on a GDP per capita basis and Pakistan in raw exports.

The 2020s will have to be the decade Pakistan caught up.

Yup peace and stability in Afghanistan is very importance for Pakistan, that should be the main Pakistan concern, not about which side that can improve Pakistan influence over that state.

I also see many bombs and terrorism happening in Pakistan in the past, that scares investors a lot, and now the situation is getting better.

The world know what happen with Malala for instant.
 
.
I see you are a very pro military rules, just be wise here, just look on the condition on Myanmar, just dont make any attempt to bring military rules again and you are living in US now, you will not face any consequences if that thing ever happen in Pakistan.....

And I see many Pakistani members here saying Pakistani military who lead many Pakistani institution and SOE is the main problem of mismanagement.....

Better see the cause and fix it, just dont try to seduce both Pak military and its supporters to make any coup again

And there are also unsuccessful authorian rule like North Korea, Myanmar, Venezuela, Cambodia, Laos
Well no one wants millitary rule but its a fact that Pakistan had vetter economic growth in military eras and yes military (ex mil men) leads institutions but under them still there are corrupt looters working even if some if ex mil men are themselves clean
64244294_1257967471043633_6856464020145176576_n.jpg
15 lakh aye ?
 
. .
@RiazHaq

Brof sb,

Good article as usual, sir. But saying that Pakistan's lost decade was purely due to "democratic rule" is too simplistic.

Mushy completely neglected the power sector which was to bite the Pak economy in 2010s. And resulted in the overexeburant addition to capacities under MNS through the CPEC project.

Regards
 
. . .
@RiazHaq

Brof sb,

Good article as usual, sir. But saying that Pakistan's lost decade was purely due to "democratic rule" is too simplistic.

Mushy completely neglected the power sector which was to bite the Pak economy in 2010s. And resulted in the overexeburant addition to capacities under MNS through the CPEC project.

Regards

In 2009, Pakistan's installed generating capacity was about 20,000 MW. It exceeded demand of 17,000 MW and actual supply of just 10,000 MW. The capacity utilization was only 50% mainly because the producers did not buy sufficient fuel and chose to operate at only 50% of capacity and still enjoyed soaring profits. A third of the installed generating capacity was owned by the independent power producers (IPPs). TheIPP contracts guaranteed payments such as capacity charges and profits with no requirement for fuel efficiency.

Bad IPP contracts signed during PPP & PMLN governments are now costing the taxpayers burdened with mounting "circular debt".

 
.
@RiazHaq

Brof sb,

Good article as usual, sir. But saying that Pakistan's lost decade was purely due to "democratic rule" is too simplistic.

Mushy completely neglected the power sector which was to bite the Pak economy in 2010s. And resulted in the overexeburant addition to capacities under MNS through the CPEC project.

Regards

The real irony is that even the OP himself posted all upbeat news about the Pakistani economy throughout this time right here on PDF. This present about turn is only to get on the bandwagon of laying the blame on the past to explain the present failures. Granted that this is a almost a panoramic failure that was decades in the making, but still, there is nothing new here, really.
 
.
2008-2017 to be more exact

  • Zardari Government (5 years) = Gas Crisis / Power Crisis, Circular Debt
  • Nawaz Sharif Government (5 years) = Political Limbo , Water Shortages, Electricity Shortages
 
.
Musharraf was the best thing to have ever happened for Pakistan...He successfully capitalized on the War on Terror for the benefit of Pakistan...The civilian governments squandered his gains....Too bad Musharraf was given the Death Penalty....I think him taking out Benazir Bhutto was the correct decision...Pakistan can only progress if such corrupt civilian leaders are tactically liquidated by the Army
 
.
@RiazHaq

Brof sb,

In 2009, Pakistan's installed generating capacity was about 20,000 MW. It exceeded demand of 17,000 MW and actual supply of just 10,000 MW.

You are missing the finer point. Most of this 20GW capacity was fuel oil based, which is way too expensive for consumers of a developing country- that too during the peak of the oil cycle. Mushy never invested substantially in coal or hydro power during his tenure which could have avoided this peril.

Perhaps Niaz sb @niaz or SAH sb @VCheng can shed some light on this.

Regards
 
.
maybe pakistan should shut out all low tech imports to force the 200 million people to do some work
Stupid Pakistanis feel proud by exporting agri/fruits at cheap prices and creating food shortages for local people while at the same time spend thousands of dollars on importing overpriced junk of an iphone
 
.
Back
Top Bottom