xenon54 out
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 17,568
- Reaction score
- 20
- Country
- Location
So Breivik is the exsample that comes to your mind when i say ''under worst conditions''?Their lives are a liability, you cannot guarantee they won't get free somehow. Death is the best conclusion, but the only thing which makes me doubt about implementing it now. can our judges be reliable to make correct statements at all time. For example Reis bey.
And by extending their lives you are actually being merciful on the criminal and merciless against the relatives. The criminal is still living and unless its something like OZ he will have a reasonable life. Best example at the moment Breivik. The relatives now have to live on with the knowledge that this criminal is alive while their child is death, and to add salt to injury they have to pay people to guard him and money to give the criminal a minimal living(a.k.a taxpayers money).
But if we implement the death penalty I can already see the European headlines.
I would rather die than being held in a rat cage for the rest of my life, do you think you can call this a life?
No my friend, i still think death is a too easy way out for such criminals, i still think their life should be made to hell till they die, without the option for them to see freedom in their life again.