What's new

2 Days to go... Victory Day for Bangladeshi nation. A tribute to Freedom Fighters

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry to tell you this but Bangladeshis were considered second class citizens in West Pakistan even the Muslims.
Just tell how Bengali women work today in prostitution,sir east Pakistan was more prosper and educated then west but peoples on Large scale can be easily fooled, and 16 dec 1971 if that was Bangladesh victory then Niazi would have surrendered in front of Atta ul ghani usmani not Gen Arora.
 
.
The distance between Pakistan and Bangladesh 2200 KM....
Distance between Pakistan and Pakistan - Zero kms.

There was no B'desh before or during the war - it was Pakistan. Your failure to recognize them as your own country and your own people is what led to the war in the first place.

It was the ineptitude of your military that they failed to secure half the country. Distance had nothing to do with it - it was the flawed military doctrine that led to the defeat. The Pak army command, in all its unwisdom, declared the dotrine that "The deefence of the east lies in the west". They concentrated all their offensive power in the west, in the assumption that attacking India from another front would cause India to divert forces from the other front. However, that strategy failed miserably when the PA's formidable strike element comprising state of the art armour and infantry came to agrinding halt at Longewala and other places. Despite the huge force concentration of PA in the west, the IA was easily able to prevent PA from mounting any effective attacks. So don't make up excuses like distance (as if you didn't know about that before the war) after losing.

In fact the two wings of Pak could have been a big asset - if Pak had distributed forces judiciously, you could have forced India into a two front war, which is a big headache for any war planners. You could have mounted offenses on India from the east and west, had you not maintained such an idiotic doctrine.
 
. . .
As a Pakistani, I am not bitter about 71', but what irks me is that our brethren sided with the kaafirs and have now become enslaved to them.

When Bangladesh retains freedom from Indian hegemony, I will truly enjoy this song.
Are you high!!! what nonsense are you talking. Bangladesh is much peaceful country than yours, have seen their GDP, export and compared to your Pakistan, you should be ashamed. You are a religious bigot and bring religion to even simple thing. Get out of this mindset and see where it has taken Pakistan, this year alone more than 50,000 people died in Pakistan because of terriosm and you are giving lecture. You are a lunatic who doesn't understand right meaning of religion, you talk about Indian kaafir and you carrying American kaffir flag with you, what a double standard Every time you will blame America for every thing in your country and you will be first in line to collect visa for the same country also. Please get out of the forum if you can't bring anything positive, :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
You people make us sick with your tiny bit brain, who is here in forum just for 2 min. fame.:flame::flame::flame:
 
.
Just tell how Bengali women work today in prostitution,sir east Pakistan was more prosper and educated then west but peoples on Large scale can be easily fooled, and 16 dec 1971 if that was Bangladesh victory then Niazi would have surrendered in front of Atta ul ghani usmani not Gen Arora.

What kind of logic is that ??

Indian role is just to help the Mukti Bahini and liberate BD. India army lead the charge and after that BD formed its own armed forces and Govt.
 
.
Just tell how Bengali women work today in prostitution,sir east Pakistan was more prosper and educated then west but peoples on Large scale can be easily fooled, and 16 dec 1971 if that was Bangladesh victory then Niazi would have surrendered in front of Atta ul ghani usmani not Gen Arora.

And you mean in west Pakistan, women are not in prostitution. what type of logic is this. All over the world prostitution is there in some country in legal form, some in illegal form. You are completely derailing the post. If you are from male you should understand just few days back countries like India & Bangladesh and many other country send water to male and helped in your need and you are putting such derogatory remarks against the Bangladeshi women, you should fist think and then
post. Don't be childish and acknowledge other people even you are not supporting their view. Just my 2 cent....its up to you to understand.:-):-):-):-):-):-)
 
.
Just tell how Bengali women work today in prostitution,sir east Pakistan was more prosper and educated then west but peoples on Large scale can be easily fooled, and 16 dec 1971 if that was Bangladesh victory then Niazi would have surrendered in front of Atta ul ghani usmani not Gen Arora.
Prostitution, now that's rich coming from a slav.
 
. .
Distance between Pakistan and Pakistan - Zero kms.

There was no B'desh before or during the war - it was Pakistan. Your failure to recognize them as your own country and your own people is what led to the war in the first place.

It was the ineptitude of your military that they failed to secure half the country. Distance had nothing to do with it - it was the flawed military doctrine that led to the defeat. The Pak army command, in all its unwisdom, declared the dotrine that "The deefence of the east lies in the west". They concentrated all their offensive power in the west, in the assumption that attacking India from another front would cause India to divert forces from the other front. However, that strategy failed miserably when the PA's formidable strike element comprising state of the art armour and infantry came to agrinding halt at Longewala and other places. Despite the huge force concentration of PA in the west, the IA was easily able to prevent PA from mounting any effective attacks. So don't make up excuses like distance (as if you didn't know about that before the war) after losing.

In fact the two wings of Pak could have been a big asset - if Pak had distributed forces judiciously, you could have forced India into a two front war, which is a big headache for any war planners. You could have mounted offenses on India from the east and west, had you not maintained such an idiotic doctrine.

No big deal, Usual nonsense....
Simple answer....
There was always a nation with ideology of akhand baharat, between East and West Pakistan....
 
. .
No big deal, Usual nonsense....
Simple answer....
There was always a nation with ideology of akhand baharat, between East and West Pakistan....
If that ideology is what impelled us, then we would have annexed Bangladesh after the war. Instead, we gave them a country of their own, and withdrew after the Pakistan army was routed.

Yea, you can dismissively call it "usual nonsense" or whatever, but the hard fact is that every sentence I wrote is true. No amount of handwaving can erase the facts.

Happy Independance/Victory day to all Bangladeshi brethern. May you prosper and grow. We stand united by Islam and by the threat posed by a common enemy.

LOL.

The same delusion persists, even after the 1971 fiasco. Religion has never helped a country stay together, if it was an artificially created country. Sense of nationhood and sense of religious kinship are different things, which is why Jinnah's experiment of forging a nation based on religious commonality failed, and ended up getting split in two. You can see the artificially created countries in thee middle east as well, which are perpetually in civil war - although they all follow islam over there.

OTOH Iran or India or USA or Australia don't need religion to hold together, because the sense of nationhood is strong in these countries. Iran had a self identity for millenia, so with or without religion, they stay together. India has a sense of identity as well, which is why despite the biggest religious diversity on the planet, we stay together. Australia has a geographical identity, and so on.
 
. . .
Just tell how Bengali women work today in prostitution,sir east Pakistan was more prosper and educated then west but peoples on Large scale can be easily fooled, and 16 dec 1971 if that was Bangladesh victory then Niazi would have surrendered in front of Atta ul ghani usmani not Gen Arora.

Just two points:

1. East Pakistan was treated like a colony of West Pakistan in almost all ways possible, during the period of 1947-1971 East Pakistan (Bangladesh) just transited from British rule to West Pakistani rule.

2. Soon Bangladesh will become richer than Pakistan in terms of GDP, they are already ahead of Pakistan in many HDI parameters.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom