aziqbal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2010
- Messages
- 7,403
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
Exercise of masturbation in remembrance of Pax Britannica?
Reported
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exercise of masturbation in remembrance of Pax Britannica?
i personally never liked the 2 island design but wat so i know
Childish.Reported
No - QE is more advanced and better than the 003.
Electronics on the QE will outclass everything that China has - you forget the lineage and pedigree of developing advanced electronic warfare systems by BAe...
Propulsion - nuclear propulsion is point less if all of the neighbouring ships in a battle group need to be refuelled periodically. There is no range to tactical advantage - that is why the RN went the way it did.
Launch system - lets see if you can get it to work ..
UK doesn't have any electronics advantage. They don't even have a 300 mm wafer fab or processes more advanced than 90 nm which came out 20 years ago.
QE class is not alone and is accompanied by one of the best destroyers in the world, Type 45 so AWACS is not needed, and EMALS just for launching the aircraft, steam catapult can launch as many aircraft that your Type 003 able to launch but main advantages of EMALS is less stress and wear and tear on launching airframe
RN is still learning how to fly off carriersVMFA-211 on their carriers. Interesting....
Then why can UK send it’s carrier to China but China cannot do the same
It's very expensive to sail on such a long journey.
This is what you call power projection
USS Ronald Reagan
USS Iwo Jima
Meet up with HMS QE in Gulf of Aden on route to South China Sea
View attachment 761845View attachment 761846View attachment 761847View attachment 761848View attachment 761849View attachment 761850View attachment 761851View attachment 761852
Then why can UK send it’s carrier to China but China cannot do the same
What a beautiful site