What's new

1st image of Mars, from a height of 7300 km; with 376m spatial resolution.

.
LOL no Problem, I only asked PROOF of this MARS Mission, like 20 of you indians started replying me, derailing the thread:

Again I ask you:

INDIA NEED TO GIVE PROOF IT WENT TO MARS, A PICTURE OF MOM PROBE AND MARS SURFACE TOGETHER !!! :devil::patsak:

Otherwise its a FAILED mission....a Big Joke...Waste of Money !

And stop including we ASIANS in your Dramas...and Jokes

i have seen many pakistanis on this very forum criticizing our mars mission ,but you're a very special one why this obsession ?nasa has confirmed it so did the Chinese and the entire world media is covering it now why must we "indians"provide any proof to a failed state delusional moron like you??to you the world is flat to you the media is all jewish creation to you it's all evil hindo raw paid propaganda there's no mars mission haha
 
.
Asia already acknowledged it.....and you are not provoked by indians..you are provoked by your habit of jealousy....we don't need to give proof to any butt hurt person like you.

and BTW come again after some months to beg the proof..

GSLV MK 3 is on its way to give you more pain....

What makes you think am butt hurt or jealous??? am only asking for PROOF....and YOU Indians keep saying we HAVE NO PROOF.....

Seriously am laughing my a$$ of right now....IF YOU GO TO MARS...PROVIDE SIMPLE PICTURES OF MOM PROBE AND MARS SURFACE...Is it too difficult to ask for.
 
.
Ok, waste of money. Tell me one thing you pay IT here, but I pay definitely. If the tax payers dont have problem with this tin can, then why you using your so much stupid brain here.

And bro seriously, you can think whatever you want, but we dont give a shit about you. You are what, President of Indian or anything, that ISRO require to give proof to you.

We have faith in ISRO, if you dont have, then its not problem of India, and next time come here after psychiatric test.

When we launched our first satellite , people started the same shit!

It means the stuff is exactly right there :lol:
 
.
What makes you think am butt hurt or jealous??? am only asking for PROOF....and YOU Indians keep saying we HAVE NO PROOF.....

Seriously am laughing my a$$ of right now....IF YOU GO TO MARS...PROVIDE SIMPLE PICTURES OF MOM PROBE AND MARS SURFACE...Is it too difficult to ask for.

You are really hilarious? Why we give proof to you?
 
.
What makes you think am butt hurt or jealous??? am only asking for PROOF....and YOU Indians keep saying we HAVE NO PROOF.....

Seriously am laughing my a$$ of right now....IF YOU GO TO MARS...PROVIDE SIMPLE PICTURES OF MOM PROBE AND MARS SURFACE...Is it too difficult to ask for.
we have provided pics.and many more to come.....but its very difficult of a person to understand who have closed his eyes and and in denial mode......in short BUTT-HURT.....
 
.
FOOD FOR THOUGHT INDIANS:

the Mangalyaan begins its journey, many might wonder how a country that cannot feed all of its people can find the money for a Mars mission. How can poor countries like India afford space programmes?

India is not the only emerging economy with space ambitions. Nigeria already has a handful of satellites floating around the Earth (though these were launched by others). Depending how you define a space programme, even minnows like Sri Lanka, Bolivia and Belarus have plans of some sort to get space activity under way. By one count, including co-operative efforts between countries but not fully private ones, there are currently over 70 space programmes, though only a dozen of these have any sort of launch capability. China’s programme is advanced: last year it put a woman in space, and in December it will launch its first (uncrewed) lunar mission.

From a distance, India's extra-terrestrial ambitions might seem like a waste of money. The country still has immense numbers of poor people: two-fifths of its children remain stunted from malnutrition and half the population lack proper toilets. Its Mars mission may be cheap by American (or Chinese) standards, at just $74m, but India’s overall space programme costs roughly $1 billion a year. That is more than spare change, even for a near $2-trillion economy. Meanwhile, spending on public health, at about 1.2% of GDP, is dismally low. What if the 16,000 scientists and engineers now working on space development were deployed instead to fix rotten sanitation? And why should donors bother to help tackle poverty where governments have enough spare resources to think about space? For some countries, at least, decent answers exist to such questions. Trips to the Moon and Mars may well be mostly about showing off. But most space programmes are designed to get satellites into Earth’s orbit for the sake of better communications, mapping, weather observation or military capacity at home. These bring direct benefits to ordinary people. Take one recent example: a fierce cyclone that hit India’s east coast last month killed few, whereas a similar-strength one in the same spot, in 1999, killed over 10,000. One reason for the improvement was that Indian weather satellites helped to make possible far more accurate predictions of where and when the storm would hit. Otherwise, improved data on monsoon rains, or generally shifting weather patterns, can help even the poorest farmers have a better idea of when to plant crops.

Donors may not be mollified (Britain, for example, is winding down its aid to India). But any aid programme has to be justified in the face of other waste, which can be far costlier than space programmes. A bigger problem in India, for example, is that pitifully few people pay tax, partly because so few have formal jobs. As an emerging middle-income country, India should easily have the means to pay for proper public health, as well as the odd jaunt into space. The pity of it all: it does neither as well as it could.

- See more at: The Economist explains: How can poor countries afford space programmes? | The Economist
 
.
When we launched our first satellite , people started the same shit!

It means the stuff is exactly right there :lol:

There is lots of civilization or say country, that lives in dreams, and they think we are the most intelligent race here.

Why not these people live out of dream here, and work hard. We even say we beat the China in Mars race, but that is reality too that in Space exploration China is decade ahead of India, thats hurting, but that reality, and all should accept that, but not like these guys doing.
 
.
What makes you think am butt hurt or jealous??? am only asking for PROOF....and YOU Indians keep saying we HAVE NO PROOF.....

Seriously am laughing my a$$ of right now....IF YOU GO TO MARS...PROVIDE SIMPLE PICTURES OF MOM PROBE AND MARS SURFACE...Is it too difficult to ask for.
lol.. you are funny... someone burning. .
 
.
What resolution is the camera? Digi Cam, Iphone 8MP camera? come on that is one pathetic picture...to even asking for joying for a success.

I doubt it is even a MARS photo....looks like Chai mein bubbles bana ker picture kehenchi ha..i.loll:laughcry:
see thats why u guys couldn't even make a car on ur own... :lol:
 
.
What makes you think am butt hurt or jealous??? am only asking for PROOF....and YOU Indians keep saying we HAVE NO PROOF.....

Seriously am laughing my a$$ of right now....IF YOU GO TO MARS...PROVIDE SIMPLE PICTURES OF MOM PROBE AND MARS SURFACE...Is it too difficult to ask for.

Do you know something that rest of the world does not know. Whether you like it or not India's mars mission was a success.

Even China today congratulated India for its successful Mars mission saying that it was not only a proud achievement for the country and Asia but also a "landmark progress" in mankind's exploration of outer space.

So, stop this idiotic trolling and do something productive.
 
.
FOOD FOR THOUGHT INDIANS:

the Mangalyaan begins its journey, many might wonder how a country that cannot feed all of its people can find the money for a Mars mission. How can poor countries like India afford space programmes?

India is not the only emerging economy with space ambitions. Nigeria already has a handful of satellites floating around the Earth (though these were launched by others). Depending how you define a space programme, even minnows like Sri Lanka, Bolivia and Belarus have plans of some sort to get space activity under way. By one count, including co-operative efforts between countries but not fully private ones, there are currently over 70 space programmes, though only a dozen of these have any sort of launch capability. China’s programme is advanced: last year it put a woman in space, and in December it will launch its first (uncrewed) lunar mission.

From a distance, India's extra-terrestrial ambitions might seem like a waste of money. The country still has immense numbers of poor people: two-fifths of its children remain stunted from malnutrition and half the population lack proper toilets. Its Mars mission may be cheap by American (or Chinese) standards, at just $74m, but India’s overall space programme costs roughly $1 billion a year. That is more than spare change, even for a near $2-trillion economy. Meanwhile, spending on public health, at about 1.2% of GDP, is dismally low. What if the 16,000 scientists and engineers now working on space development were deployed instead to fix rotten sanitation? And why should donors bother to help tackle poverty where governments have enough spare resources to think about space? For some countries, at least, decent answers exist to such questions. Trips to the Moon and Mars may well be mostly about showing off. But most space programmes are designed to get satellites into Earth’s orbit for the sake of better communications, mapping, weather observation or military capacity at home. These bring direct benefits to ordinary people. Take one recent example: a fierce cyclone that hit India’s east coast last month killed few, whereas a similar-strength one in the same spot, in 1999, killed over 10,000. One reason for the improvement was that Indian weather satellites helped to make possible far more accurate predictions of where and when the storm would hit. Otherwise, improved data on monsoon rains, or generally shifting weather patterns, can help even the poorest farmers have a better idea of when to plant crops.

Donors may not be mollified (Britain, for example, is winding down its aid to India). But any aid programme has to be justified in the face of other waste, which can be far costlier than space programmes. A bigger problem in India, for example, is that pitifully few people pay tax, partly because so few have formal jobs. As an emerging middle-income country, India should easily have the means to pay for proper public health, as well as the odd jaunt into space. The pity of it all: it does neither as well as it could.

- See more at: The Economist explains: How can poor countries afford space programmes? | The Economist

only this can be expected from you......your intention is only trolling....keep coming with these articles and feel pain....
we will keep achieving things and you will keep posting these type of articles and begging proof instead of competing.
in next 50 years
in next 100 years......
 
.
"What if the 16,000 scientists and engineers now working on space development were deployed instead to fix rotten sanitation of India?"

Why you thinking so much about India? Go, Clean your own house. And again saying you really need a Doctor, you are suffering with OCD.
 
.
"What if the 16,000 scientists and engineers now working on space development were deployed instead to fix rotten sanitation of India?"
no your scientists and engineers are only expert in this.....we will outsource them...
 
.
only this can be expected from you......your intention is only trolling....keep coming with these articles and feel pain....
we will keep achieving things and you will keep posting these type of articles and begging proof instead of competing.
in next 50 years
in next 100 years......

This is a reply to you guys WORLD has acknowledged, this article is from ECONOMIST....
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom