19th SAARC Conference in Islamabad 2016-News and Updates

[zebra7]

A bit further back in history, we learnt from you when India sent troops in Kashmir in the name of so-called accession against the wish of people and Mukti Bahni in Bangladesh.

Wrong history classes or books or bunked the classes all together.

Indian Army landed in Srinagar Airport just, when the Kabaili were just 20 KM away from Srinagar aka Barahmullah. So who came to Kashmir first could be easily guessed. And BTW India only landed its foot after the King signed the Treaty of Assession with the India.

My advise Pls go through the Neutral History Classes, and updater yourself.

 

[Stannis Baratheon]

Again an internal matter for the sovereign nation of Bangladesh, Pakistan as nothing to do with it neither does it have impact on Pakistan either externally nor internally

Pakistan definitely has something to do with it. These people had helped them and were later sent to Pakistan but upon pardon returned to Bangladesh only to be punished by a vengeful idiot. If they hadn't done anything, Pakistan would have found it extremely difficult get any favourable approach from foreign political party.

Turkey has nothing to do with regional politics of South Asia, Erdogan was just clamoring to be seen as some kind of messiah to the Islamist's thats all

Erdogan and his party has links to Jamaat and Turkish military and Bangladeshi military had great relations which Hasina destroyed (we had great relations with other countries like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and China all of which were destroyed by Hasina) for being BFFs with India and Burma. Retarded liberalists and westerners (who do it because they hate Islam and Muslims but will call themselves humanists and crap like that) only call Erdogan a madman or say that he has some kind of evil plan to manipulate Muslims.

 

[The Eagle]

Wrong history classes or books or bunked the classes all together.

Indian Army landed in Srinagar Airport just, when the Kabaili were just 20 KM away from Srinagar aka Barahmullah. So who came to Kashmir first could be easily guessed. And BTW India only landed its foot after the King signed the Treaty of Assession with the India.

My advise Pls go through the Neutral History Classes, and updater yourself.

Away and Indian Army landed, did you not the point. Accession was against the wish of the people hence resistance till today. Not a good idea to doubt others update.

 

[zebra7]

Away and Indian Army landed, did you not the point. Accession was against the wish of the people hence resistance till today. Not a good idea to doubt others update.

Again wrong classes of Geography. 2-3 Districts of Kashmir is not whole J&K.

My advice kindly study geography, and the conditions of the whole 22 districts of J&K.

 

[The Eagle]

Again wrong classes of Geography. 2-3 Districts of Kashmir is not whole J&K.

My advice kindly study geography, and the conditions of the whole 22 districts of J&K.

TBH, I am not interested in Indian fed geography at all. Give it a rest. There is a new history to be written in the lights of such past events from both sides.

 

[zebra7]

TBH, I am not interested in Indian fed geography at all. Give it a rest. There is a new history to be written in the lights of such past events from both sides.

Yes and the history would tell, that Pakistan didn't learned from its past, and the problems and all the turmoil ended with the end of the Ideology, which was the root cause of all of the problem.

 

[The Eagle]

Yes and the history would tell, that Pakistan didn't learned from its past, and the problems and all the turmoil ended with the end of the Ideology, which was the root cause of all of the problem.

Vise versa. Thank you. Busy ATM. Agree to disagree.

 

[zebra7]

Really??? so wat about Simla agreement violation by Pakistan??. jbgt U can argue in that way like Simla agreement is bilateral treaty but IWT brokered/mediated by world bank.

Try this

 

[SrNair]

Afghanistan? who was brought to SAARC by Pakistan.

Bangladesh ? Ohhh Sorry I mean Hassina, wellll nothing to explain.

Bhutan hmmmm a small country that is blackmailed by India but wait the real humiliation was when even Bhutan despite a colony of India showed eyes to India sometime back.


SAARC also include Sri Lanka and Nepal

Still 4 of them are SAARC nations .

On Topic: At the end Indian PM meant business when said about revenge .

SAARC meetings have suffered due to Indian "integration hostile terrorism" .

SAARC meetings suffered because of Indo Pak Tensions.

 

[Spring Onion]

Still 4 of them are SAARC nations .

On Topic: At the end Indian PM meant business when said about revenge .



SAARC meetings suffered because of Indo Pak Tensions.

It is India which is trying to heal her bruised Ego. Pakistan never refused to attend such international moots. .

And if this is revenge then it is a shameful revenge by India.

 

[IceCold]

The pain everyone is in, Pakistan is definitely doing something right. If Indian world consists of countries like the above than please keep them, Pakistan is better off without these shit holes.
The ANA scums in Afghanistan are getting their *** kicked by the taliban and all these scums can do is to bark.

 

[GR!FF!N]

Its callled a bite of reality. If you think otherwise then tell me the function of SAARC .

I wonder what Pakistan is doing there??Why can't they leave the party if it $uck$ so much.

 

[Pandora]

I wonder what Pakistan is doing there??Why can't they leave the party if it $uck$ so much.

If we are to leave then you burnol business in India will crash so If you have issues then leave SAARC yourself.

 

[xyxmt]

I wonder what Pakistan is doing there??Why can't they leave the party if it $uck$ so much.

thats what you want so you can get fully bullied SAARC, not gonna happen

 

[RISING SUN]

Perhaps someone should educate them that even if one country pulls out of SAARC, no meeting can be held as it's the rule of SAARC.