1965 War-Surrender by Indian troops to Pakistan

[Apprentice]

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1127227623972322

 

[Saiful Islam]

Great day for undivided Pakistan.

 

[Tipu7]

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1127227623972322

Any data available about total no of POWs captured by both sides?

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Any data available about total no of POWs captured by both sides?

Video shows 4 Sikh Regiment surrendering with 8 officers (including the CO) and 350+ troops.

 

[third eye]

Post Asia Cup..it's ' feel good ' week again !

 

[Tipu7]

I mean, in the entire war........
?

Video shows 4 Sikh Regiment surrendering with 8 officers (including the CO) and 350+ troops.

 

[Reichsmarschall]

 

[Sankpal]

1965.... india and PAk captured each other lands.......... India captured more PAK.

It's nothing new and Interesting my friends

 

[Apprentice]

1965.... india and PAk captured each other lands.......... India captured more PAK.

It's nothing new and Interesting my friends

Pakistan did not surrender in 1965. It was Indian troops' fashion to surrender in Indo-Pak conflicts until the tragedy of 1971

 

[mkb95]

i hope everyone starts to feel good after this thread so we can undo it in t20 world cup.

 

[chhota bheem]

Pakistan did not surrender in 1965. It was Indian troops' fashion to surrender in Indo-Pak conflicts until the tragedy of 1971

It was fashionable when few troops surrender and not the whole army and nation,but you guys made it out of fashion by surrendering the whole armed forces.

 

[Apprentice]

It was fashionable when few troops surrender and not the whole army and nation,but you guys made it out of fashion by surrendering the whole armed forces.

Not the entire army was in East Pakistan. And there was really nothing to be gained without surrendering Dhaka. It was a lost cause from the start.

But what do yout think this was in 1965? These troops tried to infiltrate and sneak up from behind despite having all the advantages, yet surrendered without putting up a fight.

 

[Windjammer]

Pakistan did not surrender in 1965. It was Indian troops' fashion to surrender in Indo-Pak conflicts until the tragedy of 1971

Actually thousands of Indian soldiers had surrendered in West Pakistan even before fall of Dacca
The Indian POW were eventually repatriated in exchange for Pakistani prisoners from East Pakistan, many of which were civilians.

 

[Jackdaws]

Not the entire army was in East Pakistan. And there was really nothing to be gained without surrendering Dhaka. It was a lost cause from the start.

But what do yout think this was in 1965? These troops tried to infiltrate and sneak up from behind despite having all the advantages, yet surrendered without putting up a fight.

Of course troops are taken as PoWs - this is true of all wars - Allies and the Axis powers both had PoWs in WW2. But a surrender usually entails a surrender document - kinda like the one Niazi signed without putting up a fight. And look up history - it was Pak which sneaked in - India only opened a new front.

 

[chhota bheem]

Not the entire army was in East Pakistan. And there was really nothing to be gained without surrendering Dhaka. It was a lost cause from the start.

But what do yout think this was in 1965? These troops tried to infiltrate and sneak up from behind despite having all the advantages, yet surrendered without putting up a fight.

Ok for someone who dsnt understand.
The war dint stop,when the few Indian soldiers surrendered.
And war stopped when the Pakistani soldiers surrendered,that means whole army gave up.
Hope that helps.