graphican
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2009
- Messages
- 12,433
- Reaction score
- 48
- Country
- Location
Why do you keep on ignoring the most basic and fundamental fact that it wasn't India which initiated the conflict. All Indian responses were to mitigate and repulse the Pakistani attack and to prevent them for taking Kashmir.
India has never attacked Pakistan with an intention to annex Kashmir unlike the Pakistan.
That is irrational argument... but if you do not know, it were Indian Generals who were planning to take tea at Gim Khana Lahore not Pakistani Generals wishing to supper at Gandhinagar. The way you have delusion of victory, the same delusion is also evident in this assumption that Pakistan despite being 5 times small and ill-equipped, attacked India.
Okay keep this assumption for the sake of argument, lets say Pakistan attacked 5 times stronger Indian army and at the end of war, India, despite being bigger, despite being stronger and more powerful in the books had zero gains against weaker enemy.
- Pakistan destroyed twice more Indian jets.. so may be Pakistan was victorious in air-battle only.
- But Pakistan also destroyed hundreds of Indian tanks in Chawinda who wanted to cut Kashmir from Sialkot and lost hundred and hundreds of those.. okay so Pakistan was victorious in that battle as well..
- And Pakistan is still holding ex-Indian check posts in Chamb-Jorian - okay so that was Pakistan's victorious in Chamb-Jorian but still doesn't count as victory..
- And Pakistan is still keeping its part of Kashmir which India was trying to snatch.. okay that is just Indian failure on Kashmir but India still won the battle..
- But India does't have an inch of land to show to its Indian youth that it won - but that still doesn't matter because India had won the battle despite all these losses because Modi said so.
- But Pakistan has been celebrating victory day from the last 50 years, every year - and India never had slightest celebration - still doesn't matter because when Modi says so, India wins.