Dubious
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2012
- Messages
- 37,717
- Reaction score
- 80
- Country
- Location
You know my intentions? Really? Are you GOD? because as for us Muslims it is clear Only God knows our intentions...we also have sense.. clearly knows your true intentions.. reality is an indian posted the article and you countered it..
Secondly had an Indian poster put that up you would have thanked him...for being unbiased and showing a neutral post!
Do you want me to counter this with articles? Nice bait! I am sorry you literally choke on unbiased articles! Even if an Indian wrote it!unlike new india, in your country majority of crimes against women are not reprted because of your social envionment.
I dont expect you to understand Islam and what people do...so believe what you want!so the comparison is not possible btw india and pak... for example read about the great your HUDOOD ordanance which was the rape law upto 2006... barbarian law in 21st century.. still the social conditions are same in your islamic country... so dont compare with us..
I am not sure if you have managed to read what you copied and pasted....Do you think people rape in open daylight and watch for the act of penetration to become witness? And do you think once they have watched this "evil" and not stopped it they dont get punishment...Nothing is very wrong with this law except how it was implicated!Under hadd, "at least four Muslim adult male
witnesses, about whom the court is satisfied,
having regard to the requirements of tazkiyah al-
shuhood, that they are truthful persons and
abstain from major sins (kabair), give evidence as
eye-witnesses of the act of penetration necessary
to the offence."
Meaning this was/ is the law of how to prove an accused woman of adultery and also fornication not rape...hence the implication of the said law is wrong...But out Mullah like you ...who claim to know the universe but dont know the basics got this jargon in their heads...But I dont expect mr know it all to understand it..so spew out your hatred and walk away!
Ok now that you have spewed your crap and insulted yourself let me show you what that Hudood Ordinance really was:No case could be proven under hadd due to the
above stringent stipulation.
Punishments until now were awarded under the
Tazir provision of the Hudood Ordinance.
The Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979)[edit]
The Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance 1979 described the offences of Zina(fornication and adultery) and zina bil jabbar (rape). They were defined separately in the Ordinance. Prior to the Women Protection (Criminal Laws Amendment) Act 2006, the Hudood Ordinance provided for two kinds of punishments: punishments under hadd under its section 8 or under Tazir under section 10.
Under hadd, "at least four Muslim adult male witnesses, about whom the court is satisfied, having regard to the requirements of tazkiyah al-shuhood, that they are truthful persons and abstain from major sins (kabair), give evidence as eye-witnesses of the act of penetration necessary to the offence."
No case could be proven under hadd due to the above stringent stipulation.
Punishments until now were awarded under the Tazir provision of the Hudood Ordinance.
The 2006 Act has now totally deleted zina bil jabbar from the Hudood Ordinance and inserted sections 375 and 376 for Rape and Punishment respectively in the PPC to replace it
The Offence of Qazf (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VIII of 1979)[edit]
The Offence of Qazf (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance of 1979 described the offence of false accusation of Zina (fornication and adultery).
Why did you hide the original? Where the word Zina is written and the bit that in 2006 the whole law on rape was totally deleted so rape victims need not provide 4 witness...but you claiming to know everything should have known this, right? Maybe the 5 people who thanked you are the same as you twisting facts and hiding the truth! No wonder you were offended by what I posted!
I already answered thisthat is A woman alleging rape is required
to provide four adult male eyewitnesses. In
principal, the failure to find such proof of the rape
does not place the woman herself at risk of
prosecution. According to a report by the National Commission
on Status of Women(NCSW) "an estimated 80% of
women" in jail in 2003 were there as because
"they had failed to prove rape charges and were
consequently convicted of adultery."
According to the National Commission for the
Status of Women (NCSW) and Amnesty
International in Asia and the Pacific, 88% of the
female prisoners are in jail as a direct
consequence of the Hudood Ordinance on adultery
(including both those awaiting trial and those
convicted). According to According to the National Commission for the
Status of Women (NCSW) and Amnesty
International in Asia and the Pacific, 88% of the
female prisoners are in jail as a direct
consequence of the Hudood Ordinance on adultery
(including both those awaiting trial and those
convicted).. according to statistics compiled
by the Society for Advancement of Community
Health Education and Training (SACHET) and
Lawyers for Human Rights and Legal Aid (LHRLA)
Team for Karachi Women Prison, in 2003-2004,
7000 women and children are languishing in 75
jails in extremely poor conditions. compiled
by the Society for Advancement of Community
Health Education and Training (SACHET) and
Lawyers for Human Rights and Legal Aid (LHRLA)
Team for Karachi Women Prison, in 2003-2004,
7000 women and children are languishing in 75
jails in extremely poor conditions.
1) implementation of the Islamic law was wrong due to Mullahs like you who know nothing but scream the loudest!
2) that in 2006 the rape law was dropped off...
Now please go bury your face for being a liar!
Because unlike PDF Indians I dont keep tab of what I discuss to be used in another thread! Thats your specialty! I discuss and let the topic die on the same thread...I dont drag it around...You said that You have discussed, how come I'll find that?