What's new

12 politicians set to lose security cover after Budget session: Reports

I pray that the remove the covers for:

1- The Gandhis
2- Tarun Gogoi
3- Akhileshullah
4- Mayawati
5- Momta

These are the worst that has happened to Indian politics.

How can you forget bada mullah.. I mean mulla-yam Singh yadav and lalu prasad yadav :mad:
 
. .
That's not possible because SPG is supposed to protect family members of all former PMs. Also threat perception on Gandhi family is high.

Wrong. SPG Act states that the former PM families can be protected for 10 years since the day of leaving office.

How many years has it been since Rajiv Gandhi's assassination?
 
.
Wrong. SPG Act states that the former PM families can be protected for 10 years since the day of leaving office.

How many years has it been since Rajiv Gandhi's assassination?

Wrong. SPG act says -

There shall be an armed force of the Union called the Special Protection Group for providing proximate security to –
(i) the Prime Minister and the members of his immediate family, and
(ii) any former Prime Minister or to the members of his immediate family-
a) for a period of **ten years from the date on which the former Prime Minister ceased to hold the office of the Prime Minister; and
b) ***for any period beyond the period of ten years referred to in sub-clause (a) in a case where the level of threat faced by the former Prime Minister or by any member of his immediate family is of such a nature that such level of threat justifies the provision of proximate security to such former Prime Minister of such member of his immediate family
, as the case may be:
Provided that, while assessing the level of threat, the Central Government shall take into account the following factors, namely:-
(A) that the threat emanates from any militant or terrorist organization; and
(B) that the threat is of grave and continuing nature:
Provided further that the Central Government shall assess the level of threat periodically in such a manner that not more than twelve months shall elapse between two consecutive assessments.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA
 
.
What do you want? You want to see another assassination in that family? You love it or hate it, that family has high value targets and nation can not bear any harm to them.
 
.
I pray that the remove the covers for:

1- The Gandhis
2- Tarun Gogoi
3- Akhileshullah
4- Mayawati
5- Momta

These are the worst that has happened to Indian politics.
The Gandhis have a real threat, after Op Bluestar, Indra made enough enemies for her family. Also, removing the cover if in case leads to an assassination, holy mother of god! The India as we know will again fall for that dope.
 
.
Wrong. SPG act says -

There shall be an armed force of the Union called the Special Protection Group for providing proximate security to –
(i) the Prime Minister and the members of his immediate family, and
(ii) any former Prime Minister or to the members of his immediate family-
a) for a period of **ten years from the date on which the former Prime Minister ceased to hold the office of the Prime Minister; and
b) ***for any period beyond the period of ten years referred to in sub-clause (a) in a case where the level of threat faced by the former Prime Minister or by any member of his immediate family is of such a nature that such level of threat justifies the provision of proximate security to such former Prime Minister of such member of his immediate family
, as the case may be:
Provided that, while assessing the level of threat, the Central Government shall take into account the following factors, namely:-
(A) that the threat emanates from any militant or terrorist organization; and
(B) that the threat is of grave and continuing nature:
Provided further that the Central Government shall assess the level of threat periodically in such a manner that not more than twelve months shall elapse between two consecutive assessments.

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA

Then this has to be changed.

Think about it. Who the hell would want to snuff Pappu?

And who is threatening them? Khali-stanis? They are long dead. Except for MMS and Montek, no other Sikh is allowed near Gandhis. LeT? Why will they kill those who love them (let's face it Chidu meeting Zaeef was not really enmity)? RSS? not in hell considering that they were never involved in any killings at all as falsely alleged by Congress for so many years.

Using this loophole, any bloody corrupt politician with family relations to any PM can do anything in the future.

Have you heard of even ONE public threat that Gandhis face? Never.
 
.
I have often wondered why these gents need security.

What ground breaking deeds have they done that they need protection ?

Why should for instance Lalu or Kalmadi be given any protection ? If they feel insecure they should hire personal guards , why should the taxpayer pay to keep them alive.

In any case the earth will not stop revolving if they die - some other corrupt politician will take their place.

Our leaders are ripping us off by staying alive & we pay to keep them alive.
Arre bhai, that's nothing! Are you aware that the biggest anti India separatist extremist called Geelani of the Hurriyat Conference has been provided 24x7 security by the state? Unbelievable but true. This my friend is our great nation called Bharat!
We even protect our enemies!! 8-) :yahoo:

Cheers! :cheers:
 
.
Then this has to be changed.

Think about it. Who the hell would want to snuff Pappu?

And who is threatening them? Khali-stanis? They are long dead. Except for MMS and Montek, no other Sikh is allowed near Gandhis. LeT? Why will they kill those who love them (let's face it Chidu meeting Zaeef was not really enmity)? RSS? not in hell considering that they were never involved in any killings at all as falsely alleged by Congress for so many years.

Using this loophole, any bloody corrupt politician with family relations to any PM can do anything in the future.

Have you heard of even ONE public threat that Gandhis face? Never.

Khalistan movement may be dead but that does not mean any Sikh extremist would not want to kill them if given the chance. Threat perception on Gandhi family is high so the possibility of SPG not protecting them is very low.
 
.
Great, now go after the Gandhis and remove their SPG cover.
A member has made a very very valid point.
The Gadhis still have threat from Khalistani's and the PR value of a hit on Gandhis is amazing for a wannabe jihadi.

But most of all

If a Gandhi is assassinated, the country will have a huge sympathy wave and will vote in Congress again next term. Now, for all our sakes, we need to make sure that this does not happen.

So I say for the Greater Good, the Gandhis should still have cover. Let Modi complete his 2 terms, then it can be removed..that is because in those 2 terms, Modi will have changed India fundamentally.
 
.
I pray that the remove the covers for:

1- The Gandhis
2- Tarun Gogoi
3- Akhileshullah
4- Mayawati
5- Momta

These are the worst that has happened to Indian politics.
gandhi's you can't, there is a genuine risk involved, keep politics aside
 
.
A member has made a very very valid point.
The Gadhis still have threat from Khalistani's and the PR value of a hit on Gandhis is amazing for a wannabe jihadi.

But most of all

If a Gandhi is assassinated, the country will have a huge sympathy wave and will vote in Congress again next term. Now, for all our sakes, we need to make sure that this does not happen.

So I say for the Greater Good, the Gandhis should still have cover. Let Modi complete his 2 terms, then it can be removed..that is because in those 2 terms, Modi will have changed India fundamentally.




Then give them Z+ security- if it's good enough for the incumbent PM's immediate family (said to be the most threatened Indian PM in India's history) then it is good enough for the Gandhis. I'm quite certain the NSG can keep the Gandhis safe as they have done for Modi in the past 12 years.The drain on the SPG's resources that providing cover to tho one family is immense and would be much better provisioned to the current PM of India the person who actually holds an official position in the GoI.

Providing SPG cover to the Gandhis now is simply unjustifiable.


I'm not saying strip them of all cover completely- the IB will conduct a threat assessment as they do for all public figures and designate a security cover status accordingly- X,Y,Z, Z+ and the relevant security that goes with that.
gandhi's you can't, there is a genuine risk involved, keep politics aside
 
.
Back
Top Bottom