Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if we repeat 1962, there is nothing you can do about it, because it is better for your regime to accept defeat and move on, rather than risk nuclear annihilation.
Your politicians are living like kings off the sweat and blood of 900 million Indians who see none of the wealth that India has generated. They don't want to rock the boat. What does a military defeat concern them? Only the expendables get killed.
Then try 62, and let us see what happens. Indians of 2012 are hundred times more nationalistic and aggressive than Indians of 1962. India has been never so united ever in its history as it is now.
Then try 62, and let us see what happens. Indians of 2012 are hundred times more nationalistic and aggressive than Indians of 1962. India has been never so united ever in its history as it is now.
China never has trouble in mobilizing any thing nationwide,very few countries can do China style national mobilization this fast and efficient.it's part of the legacy of communism.
---------- Post added at 06:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:06 PM ----------
if a war broke out,China can put the whole country on war time track in weeks.India may need years to do this job.
Future wars will be short and aggressive, no need to built olympics over it. Anyways the window for Chinese for another 1962 is closing fast.
China’s nuclear arsenal which started stockpiling in 1964, The most powerful ones among China’s nuclear arsenal have yields of over 4 megatons. In comparison, India’s strategic nuclear force which started stockpiling after the 1998 Shakti tests, The most powerful among India’s nuclear warheads has an yield of 0.05 megatons which is minuscule, compared to China. and China’s nuclear delivery system is far more advanced than India’s, with multi-warhead MIRV capable ICBMs like DF-5A [12000+ km] and DF-4 [7500+ km]. It also possesses submarine launched SLBMs like JL-1 [4500+ km] and strategic fighter bombers are in its nuclear weapons delivery arsenal.
Back in 1962, China and India had similar sized economies.
Today, China is in a better position vis-a-vis India, than we have ever been, since the founding of the PRC.
Today, our economy is FOUR times bigger than the Indian economy, with commensurate military spending.
If you could not even beat us in 1962, then how could you possibly beat us now, when our power has grown exponentially relative to India's. As your own Armed Forces have already acknowledged.
Back in 1962, China and India had similar sized economies.
Today, China is in a better position vis-a-vis India, than we have ever been, since the founding of the PRC.
Today, our economy is FOUR times bigger than the Indian economy, with commensurate military spending.
If you could not even beat us in 1962, then how could you possibly beat us now, when our power has grown exponentially relative to India's. As your own Armed Forces have already acknowledged.
sports arena is the alternative battle field in peace time situation,countries sent their best to compete on the international sports stage,and we really dont see any fight possessed by Indian athletes.
sports arena is the alternative battle field in peace time situation,countries sent their best to compete on the international sports stage,and we really dont see any fight possessed by Indian athletes.
Wrong analogy
since both China and India renounced to use nuclear weapons first,a convetional war bw those two countries may last for some time,and if Indians want to go nuclear,better think before act.
all world powers are also sports giants,tell me one that isn't.dont tell me India.
Nuke is a nuke..it doesn't matter how powerful it is as long as it can hit a big a** target.
All world powers also has a big presence in motor sports...Where is China?