Gunsnroses
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2014
- Messages
- 922
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
What in God's name was this shaytaan hit with? Are our men using anti-aircraft guns on them?
Most probably, blew himself up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What in God's name was this shaytaan hit with? Are our men using anti-aircraft guns on them?
Just like manyy think tanks here can't 'think'.
In haramzadoN ki lashein chowk par latkani chahyeiN. Dead bodies of these bastards should be hanged on the busy cross sections of the city.
Rasool Allah (PBUH) did not do it because these scumbags did not exist back in his time. Besides, what is the concept behind public execution? Rasool Allah (PBUH) has prohibited to execute the criminals by burning alive, but Hazrat Ali did this to those who claimed him (Ali) to be the God. There is a fine but clear difference between Had and Tazir. The objective of the Tazir was/is to discourage repetition of the crime by adjusting the punishment (in its form and severity) to fit the circumstances of the convicted party, particularly if reparations were made or repentance shown to the offended party.No! Rasool Allah SAW never did this even for worst enemies. We as muslims have a dignity if these butchers don't. I have no sympathy for them but just bury them. Lets not follow the mediaeval dark age culture even in our thoughts.
And it will be just another day in Pakistan with the loser government busy with their goons on throwing stones on Imran Khan's caravan but can't do $hit to the mother fuckers sitting in Afghanistan.
Another reason why this government should be sent packing. Failed foreign policy, failed security policy, failed economic policy.
Thats the difference. We call all terrorists as terrorists. Unlike Pakistanis, for who, all terrorists are good terrorists untill they attack Pakistan.
TTP has claimed responsibility off these attacks so those who were sayings its BLA were wrong
Rasool Allah (PBUH) did not do it because these scumbags did not exist back in his time. Besides, what is the concept behind public execution? Rasool Allah (PBUH) has prohibited to execute the criminals by burning alive, but Hazrat Ali did this to those who claimed him (Ali) to be the God. There is a fine but clear difference between Had and Tazir. The objective of the Tazir was/is to discourage repetition of the crime by adjusting the punishment (in its form and severity) to fit the circumstances of the convicted party, particularly if reparations were made or repentance shown to the offended party.
I can understand your POV. However, its my understanding that these scumbags (or their dead bodies, whichever available) need to be publicly displayed so that many like them get to know what is coming to them. Killing them and getting them buried quietly does not send the message loud and clear.I do not deny what you say nor have even minor respect for them. My point is not pre- but post-execution. If your point is to punish them openly (which is already done) - yes, I agree. Even if we agree to mutilate the bodies, internet or other media is sufficient to publicise the torment they have done on their souls as compared to hanging them in the streets. But these are just my thoughts, am no expert.
No! Rasool Allah SAW never did this even for worst enemies. We as muslims have a dignity if these butchers don't. I have no sympathy for them but just bury them. Lets not follow the mediaeval dark age culture even in our thoughts.
Both of your paragraphs from your post have NO relationship to one another.
1) These people weren't sent by your government, nor they create the outer tear of the security
2) The military still runs the foreign policy for India and Afghanistan. Don't blame the government for what it can't do. One more term by the democratic leaders....and the foreign policy will be done by the democratically elected civilians
3) IK's drama has caused more security issues than ever. If he was really a true Pakistani, this is the WORST time to go any march or threatening the gov't. The amount of security aparatus moved to provide his crazy long march has caused a LOT of issues and many billions of dollars to a poor country's economy.
Don't derail the threat by blaming this attack on the gov't and by showing IK here. IK's doing the same as the terrorists...i.e. spreading fear, stopping the progress / economy of the country and wasting billions !
This has nothing to do with anything else. Your post was talking about how a "Terrorist should be a terrorist and how Pak Army has Good and Bad terrorists". So, I simply wanted to point out that how about you say something about your Hindu terrorists too, the Shiv Sena, RSS and BJP and the likes. If you don't want to say it, then there are "Good Hindu Terrorists" and "Bad Muslim or Christian Terrorists" in India. When something is done by Christian Mercenaries or Muslims, they are considered the "bad terrorists" by the Hindu majority. But if its Shiv Sena, RSS or BJP openly persecuting Christians and Muslims, destroying their places of worships, etc, etc, they are the "Good Terrorists" and they are given police and military support.That way you should also called Pakistan army, ISI, and some of your leaders like Yahya khan, BHutto and even Jinnah as terrorists who allegedly were responsible for killing of thousands in their times in Pakistan.
I will call them as terrorists when someone apart from butthurt pakistanis call them as terrorists. The ones I am calling terrorists and which Pakistan distinguishes as good and bad terrorists are world wide accepted as terrorists. Not by just Pakistan's national enemies.This has nothing to do with anything else. Your post was talking about how a "Terrorist should be a terrorist and how Pak Army has Good and Bad terrorists". So, I simply wanted to point out that how about you say something about your Hindu terrorists too, the Shiv Sena, RSS and BJP and the likes. If you don't want to say it, then there are "Good Hindu Terrorists" and "Bad Muslim or Christian Terrorists" in India.
List a few that are declared as terrorists by UNSC and are allowed to roam freely in India giving political speeches and guiding national policies and then your word has any value. Till then its just a rant of an ill informed pseduo nationalist.When something is done by Christian Mercenaries or Muslims, they are considered the "bad terrorists" by the Hindu majority. But if its Shiv Sena, RSS or BJP openly persecuting Christians and Muslims, destroying their places of worships, etc, etc, they are the "Good Terrorists" and they are given police and military support.
Nope. that's just a butt hurt rant and nothing else.Your shi*t stinks just as bad. Before you tell someone else about Hypocrisy, you should show that party how you are not a Hypocrite. Otherwise, you are wasting bandwidth and hard disk space trying to make people fools and spreading propaganda!
--This has nothing to do with anything else. Your post was talking about how a "Terrorist should be a terrorist and how Pak Army has Good and Bad terrorists". So, I simply wanted to point out that how about you say something about your Hindu terrorists too, the Shiv Sena, RSS and BJP and the likes. If you don't want to say it, then there are "Good Hindu Terrorists" and "Bad Muslim or Christian Terrorists" in India. When something is done by Christian Mercenaries or Muslims, they are considered the "bad terrorists" by the Hindu majority. But if its Shiv Sena, RSS or BJP openly persecuting Christians and Muslims, destroying their places of worships, etc, etc, they are the "Good Terrorists" and they are given police and military support.
Your shi*t stinks just as bad. Before you tell someone else about Hypocrisy, you should show that party how you are not a Hypocrite. Otherwise, you are wasting bandwidth and hard disk space trying to make people fools and spreading propaganda!
--Oh buzzoff from this thread asshole. This is a thread for the successful *** kicking of the terrorists by us.
Like it or not, we have and classify good and bad terrorists. Deal with it.