What's new

10 Most Disciplined Armies In The World

Yet it is still stronger than Pakistan.
Jews are smart? Yes. Jews are good at maths? Yes. Jews are very good at counting? Yes or are you the one dumb exception?

India - 1.3 billion population
Pak - 0.2 billion popultion.

A human resource disparity of almost 1:7 - the Indian Army is twice larger than Pakistan Army. With these odds who should prevail? Don't bother giving examples of puppy Israel facing the Arab hordes. That is example of unequals. For a start Pakistan does NOT have United States America to ride bareback. It has to do the heavy lifting itself. Pakistan does not recieve the latest US military hardware at discount prices. Unlike the Israel Arab equation Pak/India are more or less at same level of technological advancement therefore it all boils down to numbers.

Despite this huge numerical disparity* ask the Ganga-Indian's who snatched 1/3 of Kashmir from India in 1947 despite the ruler having given them all of Kashmir. Also ask them with all their 1,300,000,000 Ganga's have they managed to take Azad Kashmir back from Pakistan after nearly 70 years?

No.


* Fact: Poland v Russia. Belguim v Germany are about same in population terms as Pak v India. 1:7 disparity.
 
Last edited:
.
Jews are smart? Yes. Jews are good at maths? Yes. Jews are very good at counting? Yes

India - 1.3 billion population
Pak - 0.2 billion popultion.

A human resource disparity of almost 1:7 - the Indian Army is twice larger than Pakistan. with these odds who should prevail? Don't bother giving examples of puppy Israel facing the Arab hordes. That is example of unequals. for a start Pakistan does NOT have United States America to ride bareback. It has to do the heavy lifting itself. Pakistan does not recieve the latest US military hardware at discount prices. Unlike the Israel Arab equation Pak/India are moreorles at same level of technological advancent therefore it all boils down to numbers.

Despite this ask the Ganga-Indian's who snatched 1/3 of Kashmir from India in 1947 despite the ruler having given them all of Kashmir. Also ask them with all their 1,300,000,000 Ganga's have they manahed to take Azad Kashmir back from Pakistan after nearly 70 years?

No.
:tup:I was going to tell him about the numbers and other stuff but than i remembered my past experience with this guy sigh
 
. . .
How come Pakistan army a disciplined army when the top gernails are not sure who is giving support to terrorists / non state actors also the osama bin laden incident showed the weakness of Pakistani army when they denied that they do not know how he is living near abbottabad near to army installations.
 
. . .
Despite this huge numerical disparity* ask the Ganga-Indian's who snatched 1/3 of Kashmir from India in 1947 despite the ruler having given them all of Kashmir. Also ask them with all their 1,300,000,000 Ganga's have they manahed to take Azad Kashmir back from Pakistan after nearly 70 years?

If you know the facts of the history India did not intervene between Pakistan and J&K until the receipt of letter of accession on 26th October and then India sent her forces to Kashmir on 27th october and pushed back Pak Army/infiltrators from near capture of Srinagar to current LoC. So you did not snatch the parts of J&K from India but from Maharaja of Kashmir. After 27 october 1947 India has gained Siachin, Turtok and a few strategic heights from Pakistan while Pakistan has lost apart from these territories Shaksgam Valley and East Pakistan.
The day India gets a signal from the people of "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir", the next day they will be part of India. And for your information India is much beyond the gangetic basin. Gangetic basin has less than 1/3rd of India's population.
 
.
maybe its the last 10?
Trying to make indian army rise to a superior level?
no dear that ain't gonna happen :)

Disciplined armies to whom and how come Pakistan army on top,when half of the years of its existance its has overthrown govts whos orders it is supposed to take.
I sense your obsession :D argue about kenyan force.... don't you?

How come Pakistan army a disciplined army when the top gernails are not sure who is giving support to terrorists / non state actors also the osama bin laden incident showed the weakness of Pakistani army when they denied that they do not know how he is living near abbottabad near to army installations.
hey there you too are suffering.... I can see pain...
try flurbiprofen, ketoprofen, and naproxen, they may help for burns :D

@GreenFalcon our army rocks!
 
.
Trying to make indian army rise to a superior level?
no dear that ain't gonna happen :)


I sense your obsession :D argue about kenyan force.... don't you?


hey there you too are suffering.... I can see pain...
try flurbiprofen, ketoprofen, and naproxen, they may help for burns :D

@GreenFalcon our army rocks!
As usual the Bakhts start to experience pain everywhere, when Pakistan is complimented in any way. :lol:
 
.
Channels like TheRichest are run by content generation companies. They know PAkistanis are the most obsessed with the army, so what better way to generate more traffic than putting Pakistani Army right on the top of Most "disciplined" armies in the world.

An army with a history of so many Coup d'état is the most disciplined army in the world :omghaha:

Yea The Richest is going to do that because Pakistan loves their army lmaoo. Are you an idiot? If they operated as if Pakistan is the central focus they would have placed us as number 1 genius not fucking Kenya lol. Next time try to use a more sane logic while taking out your frustration. Indians in here went straight to bash Pakistanis just like you did. Seems like you're more obsessed than us.

BTW go on YouTube and see all the other burnol requiring bhartis. If they even see Pakistan in a top ten list they start ranting about how our army is shit and how we do not deserve to be on the list. It's a daily trend of frustration and anger. Not one Pakistani on here started with "how come India is in the top ten" did they now? Instead of questioning Pakistan question the Kenyan army. That would make a lot more sense. Putting down other people to make your selves feel better is what weak minded people do. Bharat produces these people in droves.

@The Sandman @django it's not worth arguing with them. Their Obsession holds no bounds.
 
Last edited:
. .
Man for man, brigade for brigade, Pak army is and was and will be far superior to your ally the Hindian army.Shalom
I don't want this post to become a cluster****, so I will have my opinions and leave.

Jews are smart? Yes. Jews are good at maths? Yes. Jews are very good at counting? Yes or are you the one dumb exception?

India - 1.3 billion population
Pak - 0.2 billion popultion.

A human resource disparity of almost 1:7 - the Indian Army is twice larger than Pakistan Army. With these odds who should prevail? Don't bother giving examples of puppy Israel facing the Arab hordes. That is example of unequals. For a start Pakistan does NOT have United States America to ride bareback. It has to do the heavy lifting itself. Pakistan does not recieve the latest US military hardware at discount prices. Unlike the Israel Arab equation Pak/India are more or less at same level of technological advancement therefore it all boils down to numbers.

Despite this huge numerical disparity* ask the Ganga-Indian's who snatched 1/3 of Kashmir from India in 1947 despite the ruler having given them all of Kashmir. Also ask them with all their 1,300,000,000 Ganga's have they managed to take Azad Kashmir back from Pakistan after nearly 70 years?

No.


* Fact: Poland v Russia. Belguim v Germany are about same in population terms as Pak v India. 1:7 disparity.
We didn't have the United States of America in 1967 buddy. And by the way, the Arabs had the Russians supporting them before, in the time and after the war. Israel against Egypt alone was at a disadvantage, number, quality of weapons and population wise. 2.74 million people in Israel, 33.8 million people in Egypt, this was a 1:12 disparity, again, NOT adding Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and more expeditionary forces.

We had much worse disadvantage than any other country in the history of time yet we still won decisively.
 
.
We didn't have the United States of America in 1967 buddy
Yes, I am aware of that. However the migrants who set up the State of Israel came from Germany, Russia, Poland, America, Britain and other countries in Europe. A European stock had been transplanted in Middle East which in 1947 was barely struggling out of the middle ages.

Therefore a highly motivated European demographic [it had suffered from Nazi Germans] and well connected to donor groups in the West [like Zionists organizations] many of which had significant backers in high places faced a disorganized, tribal ridden, barely political conscious Arabs mostly still seeped in traditions unchanged since middle ages.It indeed was perfect disparity of capabilities.

I am not saying that such inequalties exist in only your case - they always do. History and circumstance can bestow advantages. Pakistan similarly was bestowed with one advantage like Israel was in 1947 - not that many Pakistani's are prepared to accept that.

In 1947 Pakistan was even more at disadvantage with regards to India. The previous colony, the British Raj [which was a British fabricated product covering todays Myanmar/Burma, Bangladesh, Bharat/Indian Rep and Pakistan. Most of the administrative architecture of the British Raj built by them over preceding 200 years ended up in Indian Republic. Industry, most of the bureaucratic machine including the capital, banking assets and the dominant share of the population were placed at the disposal of the new Indian Republic in 1947.

British Raj Empire - 1909. Notice it stretches from Burma in the west to Afghanistan on the east.

CxI17CzXAAANb-i.jpg


The same British Empire today which is number of sovereign states.

CxI2EADWgAA4MOw.jpg



In 1947 Indian Republic had all the advantages. It had the population superiority. It had inheritated most of the trapping's of the empire built up by British over two centuries of rule. Pakistan on the other hand inheritated small population, a large tract of desert or semi arid land. Most of Pakistan in climatic terms is not vastly differant from Middle East. Indeed it is the easterly extension of the ME dry zone.


rainfall.jpg


Worse within the year India and Pakistan were at war. There was every reason to believe that a country Pakistan [Belguim] facing India [Germany] with all the advantages would have been crushed within week of hostilities. However this 'Belguim' faced of this 'Germany' in South Asia and is still facing the odds. Just so as to clear Pak/India disparity is about the same as Belguim/Germany disparity.

So how is this explained? Was it the mullah chant that saved Pakistan against the Indian Goliath? Did Allah intervene? No. Nothing of the kind. The explaination is very simple. History had given India most of the advantages of the British Raj however the British for variety of reasons had been selective in recruiting soldiers to their British Indian Army. 3/4 of the ethnic groups that made up Pakistan in 1947 were on that selective list. See below.

Cw-segtXcAAheo-.jpg


Punjabi Muslims were the single largest ethnic group in the British Raj Armies. The Pashtuns [Pathans] despite making tiny population also had significant presence. In 1947 a major chunk of century of military tradition - in the form of Punjabi Muslim and Pashtuns went on to make Pakistan. This meant a big chunk of the British Raj Army regiments recruited from what became Pakistan went on to make Pakistan Army.

Therefore in 1947 despite having disadvantage in almost everything Pakistan was bestowed with one critical asset. A major portion of the British Empires regiments which had seen extensive combat experiance in both WWs. It was the military traditions of the British Raj that gave Pakistan a chance to fend off a larger country. Examples of the human assets that Pakistan inheritated from the British Empire Armies were

Lt. Col. Mahmud Khan Durrani - George Cross Winner WW2


e6ed00494cd1a8ee111cdb4c56769616.jpg


Link > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmood_Khan_Durrani



Jemadar Ali Haider - Victoria Cross Winner WW2

ebf-hero-ali-haidar.jpg


Link > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Haidar_(VC)

It was this legacy that helped Pakistan to face off India. On the other hand this very military tradition built up under the British Raj because of their selective preferance in recruiting from the ethnic groups that make Pakistan has been the cause of a very militarized society where the army holds enormous influence.

In the same way the European migrants from Europe brought with them advantages that placed them above the Arabs in Middle East.

FACT 1:

Not many people know this - the first division from what was then British India that was sent to Western Front in World War One in 1914 to reinforce the British and French Armies was named 'Lahore Division' and was made up of the following regiments.

1*129th Baluchis
2* 57th Wildes Rifles
3* Bhopal Rifles
4* Connaughts Rangers

Lahore Division was first non European division to engage the Germans in October 1914 and was critical in stopping the German attack on Ypres. By reinforcing the British/French lines the men of Lahore Division helped in blunting the German onslaught. The men of Lahore Division along with others suffered terribly and most regiments had causalties ranging upto 60% within month of arriving on the Western Front. All over small French and Belgian towns are buried men with names like Mohammed Sharif, Ahmed Khan etc What is forgotten is that most of the division was made up of ethnic groups from what is now Pakistan. Punjabi Muslims/Pashtuns made the backbone of the division. Connaught Rangers were mostly Irish Catholics from what is now Republic of Ireland. The first Non European to win the highest award of the British Armed forces - the Victoria Cross was Khudadad Khan VC from what is now Pakistan.

Link > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khudadad_Khan

FACT 2

Where is the Lahore Division today that fought so valiantly in WW1? Well the regiments of the British Raj that made Lahore Division are still around. In 1947 all with exception of the Irish Connaught Rangers were allocated to Pakistan Army.


*129th Baluchis > Pakistan Army > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/129th_Duke_of_Connaught's_Own_Baluchis
*57th Wildes Rifles > http://www.researchingww1.co.uk/57th-wildes-rifles-frontier-force-2
* Bhopal Rifles > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9th_Bhopal_Infantry

The case of the Irish Connaught Rangers is tragic. In 1922 the regiment mutinued against their British officers effected by the trouble back in Ireland. Some men were shot and Connaught Rangers was disbanded.

*Connaught Rangers > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connaught_Rangers

This was the nucleus of what would become later the Pakistan Army. Much as people in Pakistan complain about British rule but they must remember most of the regiments of modern Pak Army date from the British era.

@Vergennes
 
Last edited:
.
Yes, I am aware of that. However the migrants who set up the State of Israel came from Germany, Russia, Poland, America, Britain and other countries in Europe. A European stock had been transplanted in Middle East which in 1947 was barely struggling out of the middle ages.

Therefore a highly motivated European demographic [it had suffered from Nazi Germans] and well connected to donor groups in the West [like Zionists organizations] many of which had significant backers in high places faced a disorganized, tribal ridden, barely political conscious Arabs mostly still seeped in traditions unchanged since middle ages.It indeed was perfect disparity of capabilities.

I am not saying that such inequalties exist in only your case - they always do. History and circumstance can bestow advantages. Pakistan similarly was bestowed with one advantage like Israel was in 1947 - not that many Pakistani's are prepared to accept that.

In 1947 Pakistan was even more at disadvantage with regards to India. The previous colony, the British Raj [which was a British fabricated product covering todays Myanmar/Burma, Bangladesh, Bharat/Indian Rep and Pakistan. Most of the administrative architecture of the British Raj built by them over preceding 200 years ended up in Indian Republic. Industry, most of the bureaucratic machine including the capital, banking assets and the dominant share of the population were placed at the disposal of the new Indian Republic in 1947.

British Raj Empire - 1909. Notice it stretches from Burma in the west to Afghanistan on the east.

CxI17CzXAAANb-i.jpg


The same British Empire today which is number of sovereign states.

CxI2EADWgAA4MOw.jpg



In 1947 Indian Republic had all the advantages. It had the population superiority. It had inheritated most of the trapping's of the empire built up by British over two centuries of rule. Pakistan on the other hand inheritated small population, a large tract of desert or semi arid land. Most of Pakistan in climatic terms is not vastly differant from Middle East. Indeed it is the easterly extension of the ME dry zone.


rainfall.jpg


Worse within the year India and Pakistan were at war. There was every reason to believe that a country Pakistan [Belguim] facing India [Germany] with all the advantages would have been crushed within week of hostilities. However this 'Belguim' faced of this 'Germany' in South Asia and is still facing the odds. Just so as to clear Pak/India disparity is about the same as Belguim/Germany disparity.

So how is this explained? Was it the mullah chant that saved Pakistan against the Indian Goliath? Did Allah intervene? No. Nothing of the kind. The explaination is very simple. History had given India most of the advantages of the British Raj however the British for variety of reasons had been selective in recruiting soldiers to their British Indian Army. 3/4 of the ethnic groups that made up Pakistan in 1947 were on that selective list. See below.

Cw-segtXcAAheo-.jpg


Punjabi Muslims were the single largest ethnic group in the British Raj Armies. The Pashtuns [Pathans] despite making tiny population also had significant presence. In 1947 a major chunk of century of military tradition - in the form of Punjabi Muslim and Pashtuns went on to make Pakistan. This meant a big chunk of the British Raj Army regiments recruited from what became Pakistan went on to make Pakistan Army.

Therefore in 1947 despite having disadvantage in almost everything Pakistan was bestowed with one critical asset. A major portion of the British Empires regiments which had seen extensive combat experiance in both WWs. It was the military traditions of the British Raj that gave Pakistan a chance to fend off a larger country. Examples of the human assets that Pakistan inheritated from the British Empire Armies were

Lt. Col. Mahmud Khan Durrani - George Cross Winner WW2


e6ed00494cd1a8ee111cdb4c56769616.jpg


Link > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmood_Khan_Durrani



Jemadar Ali Haider - Victoria Cross Winner WW2

ebf-hero-ali-haidar.jpg


Link > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Haidar_(VC)

It was this legacy that helped Pakistan to face off India. On the other hand this very military tradition built up under the British Raj because of their selective preferance in recruiting from the ethnic groups that make Pakistan has been the cause of a very militarized society where the army holds enormous influence.

In the same way the European migrants from Europe brought with them advantages that placed them above the Arabs in Middle East.

FACT 1:

Not many people know this - the first division from what was then British India that was sent to Western Front in World War One in 1914 to reinforce the British and French Armies was named 'Lahore Division' and was made up of the following regiments.

1*129th Baluchis
2* 57th Wildes Rifles
3* Bhopal Rifles
4* Connaughts Rangers

Lahore Division was first non European division to engage the Germans in October 1914 and was critical in stopping the German attack on Ypres. By reinforcing the British/French lines the men of Lahore Division helped in blunting the German onslaught. The men of Lahore Division along with others suffered terribly and most regiments had causalties ranging upto 60% within month of arriving on the Western Front. All over small French and Belgian towns are buried men with names like Mohammed Sharif, Ahmed Khan etc What is forgotten is that most of the division was made up of ethnic groups from what is now Pakistan. Punjabi Muslims/Pashtuns made the backbone of the division. Connaught Rangers were mostly Irish Catholics from what is now Republic of Ireland. The first Non European to win the highest award of the British Armed forces - the Victoria Cross was Khudadad Khan VC from what is now Pakistan.

Link > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khudadad_Khan

FACT 2

Where is the Lahore Division today that fought so valiantly in WW1? Well the regiments of the British Raj that made Lahore Division are still around. In 1947 all with exception of the Irish Connaught Rangers were allocated to Pakistan Army.


*129th Baluchis > Pakistan Army > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/129th_Duke_of_Connaught's_Own_Baluchis
*57th Wildes Rifles > http://www.researchingww1.co.uk/57th-wildes-rifles-frontier-force-2
* Bhopal Rifles > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9th_Bhopal_Infantry

The case of the Irish Connaught Rangers is tragic. In 1922 the regiment mutinued against their British officers effected by the trouble back in Ireland. Some men were shot and Connaught Rangers was disbanded.

*Connaught Rangers > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connaught_Rangers

This was the nucleus of what would become later the Pakistan Army. Much as people in Pakistan complain about British rule but they must remember most of the regiments of modern Pak Army date from the British era.

@Vergennes
I am not going to copy-paste war with you mate.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom