What's new

10 captives, Over 20 soldiers, including Commanding Officer killed at Galwan border clash with China

.
By the Power of Indianness turbocharged with E=MSee the Indian kid killed 12 PLA troops... and then further carried two dead PLA troops in each hand to throw them into the river...but somehow lost his balance and fell into the river...

Well, how difficult could this be for an Indian? Not at all...

@masterchief_mirza @Areesh @grey boy 2 @rott @lonelyman @Pan-Islamic-Pakistan

Lads, now you have to update your Indianness Calculation Model.

One Indian killed 16 PLA troops with Bare Indian Hands!!!

20 Indian = 320+ PLA troops...with Bare Indian Hands


Wow... Can we say that Indians are from another Planet?

We common humans are nothing!!!
do not feel bad. It's time for you to start world domination.
If I use your calculation and substitute part of equation with known and established fact, you'll get astonishing result which will make your head spin...let's start..

As per theory of Mangus Ortus Novem + Indian fan boys ..
--> One Indian killed 16 PLA troops with Bare Indian Hands!!!
--> 1 Indian soldier = 16 Chinese
--> 1 Pakistani = 10 Indians (human)
--> 1 Pakistani = 160 people
--> Pakistani armed forces 600K *160 = 96 m soldiers
--> let's add 500K reserves @ 0.8 pf Pakistani soldier = 160 m soldiers
--> let's add 500K paramilitary forces @ 0.5 pf Pakistani soldier = 196 m soldiers
finally - if we pull in all Pakistani approx 210 million in Pakistan @10% capability of a Pakistani soldi
er ...
...
... you can dominate--- 3.5 Billion soldiers

Please start with China because odds are heavily in your favor (1 to 160 )
 
.

Attachments

  • upload_2020-6-23_15-59-28.png
    upload_2020-6-23_15-59-28.png
    2.4 MB · Views: 22
. .
. .
Believe me, they believe it without any question asked, sometimes even I wonder that nation is going into? It's like their media has turned them into zombies.
Yes sir like you believe and celebrate victory on 6 Sept. every year. Of course no questions asked.
 
. . . . . . . .
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom