Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, silently counting their losses and silently tending (!**king) their woundsYep. Silently smiling at your delusions.
You stupid. First get reinforcement. Will you go fight a gang of 10 with just you and one of your friend? You guys BS too much. That's your problem.What would your army do if they find a tent being errected in the area after an agreement was reached to pull back.
Just two people of PLA were seriously wounded at the clash, and no one was killed.
Now we know how India arrived to the 43 number LOL. If India loses X number of soldiers, then China must at least lose 2X. Looks like the guy confirmed the algorithm one of the posters mentioned earlier to calculate Chinese casualties LOL. No wonder why the Indian foreign ministry refused to comment on this ... this guy literally destroyed the credibility of any Indian reported Chinese casualties in a single statement. And where are the reports and images of the captured Chinese soldiers he is alluding to?China likely lost at least 40 soldiers in border clash: Indian minister
2 MIN READ
MUMBAI (Reuters) - China lost at least 40 soldiers in a clash with India at their disputed border this week, a federal government minister has said, as the nuclear-armed countries remained locked in confrontation on the frontline on Sunday.
China has not said anything about any losses in the hand-to-hand combat that took place in the heavily contested Galwan Valley in the western Himalayas, in which 20 Indian soldiers were killed and at least 76 injured.
“If 20 were martyred on our (Indian) side, then there would have been at least double the casualties on their (China) side,” V.K.Singh, the minister for roads and transport, told TV News24 in an interview broadcast late on Saturday.
Singh, who is a former army chief, did not provide any evidence to support his statement. He said China historically never accepted any war casualties including in the 1962 conflict with India.
ADVERTISEMENT
China’s state controlled Global Times said earlier there had been casualties on the Chinese side but did not elaborate.
Singh said the Indian side had handed over Chinese troops who had strayed into Indian territory after the violent standoff.
India’s defense ministry spokesman Bharat Bhushan Babu refused to comment on Singh’s interview.
The nuclear-armed Asian neighbors traded accusations on Saturday that the other had violated their shared de facto border, an area that this week became the site of their deadliest clash in half a century.
Troops remain locked in a face-off at several locations along the poorly defined Line of Actual Control, despite talks between local commanders to de-escalate.
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has criticized China for escalating border tensions with India.
Like I stated,
the casualties are more than 100 on Chinese Side.
dozens more are permanently disabled.
More importantly, CCP has lost the will to fight, they are now scare.
Like I stated,
the casualties are more than 100 on Chinese Side.
dozens more are permanently disabled.
More importantly, CCP has lost the will to fight, they are now scare.
The Military hospitals are barred by Chinese administrators for journalists. Strictly NO for making videos or clicking Pictures!
Like I stated,
the casualties are more than 100 on Chinese Side.
dozens more are permanently disabled.
More importantly, CCP has lost the will to fight, they are now scare.
Dude you need to stop smoking whatever youre smoking, its had stopped last few neurons in your already dysfunctional brain from functioning. Dont trust me, just listen to Modi. HAHAHAHA
Well, the gist seems to be,
Everything we post is gospel, even if CCP denies it
And on top of that, anything you post is a lie, no matter how genuine it is.
Ok guys, lets bite the bullet.
What is the official CCP stance on number of Chinese soldiers killed & the prisoner exchange?
Care to post the official CCP version and not some portal "quoting sources".
ok....HAHAHAHAHA..
Listed to him already & the CCP is already nervous.