ChineseTiger1986
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 23,530
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
It doesn't matter.
BTW, 2020 is a year that shows all populist leaders suck big time in their way of governing.
10 captives, Over 20 soldiers, including Commanding Officer killed at Galwan border clash with China
- Thread starter Zarvan
- Start date
It doesn't matter.
BTW, 2020 is a year that shows all populist leaders suck big time in their way of governing.
faithfulguy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 13,651
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
It look like India has become use to lose soldiers to China. I wonder if there are repeat prisoners. Maybe Indian soldiers will surrender just to get a hot lunch.
Can I have your permission to use your post if I want prove to someone that Indians are delusional.
Asian.Century
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2010
- Messages
- 10,754
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
How Indian and Chinese media reported the deadly Ladakh clash
Chinese are more like Pakistani media
China admits casualties, but its media plays down the worst clash in decades, while Indian newspapers urge a push back.
17 June 2020 GMT+3
While Chinese state media has downplayed a deadly military confrontation with India in the Indian-administered Ladakh region, Indian newspapers called for a "steely resolve" over the killing of at least 20 soldiers.
Indian news agency ANI on Tuesday night claimed that 43 Chinese soldiers had died in Monday's clash, without giving further details. Chinese media did not reveal casualties on its side.
More:
On Tuesday, the Indian army said 20 of its soldiers had been killed in a "violent face-off" along the Himalayan frontier, which resulted in "casualties on both sides". Four other Indian soldiers are reported to be in critical condition.
China's defence ministry confirmed late on Tuesday that there had been casualties, without giving a number, while its state media stayed relatively quiet on the skirmish, the most violent in decades.
Brawls erupt regularly between soldiers from the world's two most populous nations across their disputed 3,500-kilometre (2,200-mile) border - but none had proved fatal since 1975.
The latest fighting occurred in the precipitous, rocky terrain of the strategically important Galwan Valley, which lies between China's Tibet and India's Ladakh.
The soldiers threw punches and stones at each other, with Chinese troops allegedly attacking their Indian counterparts with rods and nail-studded clubs during the fight that lasted more than six hours, India's Hindustan Times newspaper reported on Wednesday.
'Steely resolve'
Another leading Indian newspaper said the government should show "steely resolve" in its response to the worst clashes with the Chinese troops in decades.
"The provocation is grave - this is not the toll taken by an act of terror by a non-state actor, but a clash between two armies. Yet India must keep a clear and determined head. It needs to respond with calm deliberation and steely resolve," the Indian Express said in an editorial.
Former Indian army officer and defence analyst Ajai Shukla wrote in the Business Standard newspaper that although India-China border skirmishes are common, Monday's face-off was "a departure from the normal".
"First, the PLA had encroached into areas like Galwan that were traditionally peaceful. Second, they entered in unusually large numbers that were in the thousands," he wrote.
"This time PLA soldiers are digging defences, preparing bunkers and deployed artillery guns to the rear [albeit in their own territory] to support the intruders, said sources."
Shukla said the "timing of the Chinese aggression" seemed to be "part of a strategy to remind India of its vulnerabilities".
The Times of India daily was more belligerent, asking for a "push back" by India.
"Beijing can't kill our soldiers at the LAC and expect to benefit from our huge market," said its editorial, as it asked New Delhi to "denounce the revocation of Hong Kong's autonomy" and "criticise human rights violations in Tibet".
Indian news channels, most of whom are believed to support the governing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), also jumped in.
An anchor on Aaj Tak, a Hindi-language news channel, said the Indian army should be blamed for the incident, and not the federal government.
"The duty to patrol the borders is of the army and not the government," she said, inviting a barrage of criticism on Indian social media.
China plays down
On the other side, the Chinese nationalist Global Times reported the number of deaths on the Indian side, but said China had not released information about casualties.
Meanwhile, state broadcaster CCTV and the Communist Party-owned People's Daily republished the Chinese military's official statement on social media, with no additional reports.
CCTV's widely watched daily Xinwen Lianbo evening news broadcast made no mention of the border confrontation on Tuesday.
The foreign ministry's official transcripts of its Tuesday press briefing redacted remarks from its spokesman about the clashes.
The Global Times said in an editorial that China did not disclose the death toll of the confrontation "to avoid comparing and preventing confrontational sentiments from escalating".
"China does not want to turn border issues with India into a confrontation," the editorial said, blaming India for "arrogance and recklessness".
https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/...rted-deadly-ladakh-clash-200617041240570.html
Chinese are more like Pakistani media
China admits casualties, but its media plays down the worst clash in decades, while Indian newspapers urge a push back.
17 June 2020 GMT+3
While Chinese state media has downplayed a deadly military confrontation with India in the Indian-administered Ladakh region, Indian newspapers called for a "steely resolve" over the killing of at least 20 soldiers.
Indian news agency ANI on Tuesday night claimed that 43 Chinese soldiers had died in Monday's clash, without giving further details. Chinese media did not reveal casualties on its side.
More:
On Tuesday, the Indian army said 20 of its soldiers had been killed in a "violent face-off" along the Himalayan frontier, which resulted in "casualties on both sides". Four other Indian soldiers are reported to be in critical condition.
China's defence ministry confirmed late on Tuesday that there had been casualties, without giving a number, while its state media stayed relatively quiet on the skirmish, the most violent in decades.
Brawls erupt regularly between soldiers from the world's two most populous nations across their disputed 3,500-kilometre (2,200-mile) border - but none had proved fatal since 1975.
The latest fighting occurred in the precipitous, rocky terrain of the strategically important Galwan Valley, which lies between China's Tibet and India's Ladakh.
The soldiers threw punches and stones at each other, with Chinese troops allegedly attacking their Indian counterparts with rods and nail-studded clubs during the fight that lasted more than six hours, India's Hindustan Times newspaper reported on Wednesday.
'Steely resolve'
Another leading Indian newspaper said the government should show "steely resolve" in its response to the worst clashes with the Chinese troops in decades.
"The provocation is grave - this is not the toll taken by an act of terror by a non-state actor, but a clash between two armies. Yet India must keep a clear and determined head. It needs to respond with calm deliberation and steely resolve," the Indian Express said in an editorial.
Former Indian army officer and defence analyst Ajai Shukla wrote in the Business Standard newspaper that although India-China border skirmishes are common, Monday's face-off was "a departure from the normal".
"First, the PLA had encroached into areas like Galwan that were traditionally peaceful. Second, they entered in unusually large numbers that were in the thousands," he wrote.
"This time PLA soldiers are digging defences, preparing bunkers and deployed artillery guns to the rear [albeit in their own territory] to support the intruders, said sources."
Shukla said the "timing of the Chinese aggression" seemed to be "part of a strategy to remind India of its vulnerabilities".
The Times of India daily was more belligerent, asking for a "push back" by India.
"Beijing can't kill our soldiers at the LAC and expect to benefit from our huge market," said its editorial, as it asked New Delhi to "denounce the revocation of Hong Kong's autonomy" and "criticise human rights violations in Tibet".
Indian news channels, most of whom are believed to support the governing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), also jumped in.
An anchor on Aaj Tak, a Hindi-language news channel, said the Indian army should be blamed for the incident, and not the federal government.
"The duty to patrol the borders is of the army and not the government," she said, inviting a barrage of criticism on Indian social media.
China plays down
On the other side, the Chinese nationalist Global Times reported the number of deaths on the Indian side, but said China had not released information about casualties.
Meanwhile, state broadcaster CCTV and the Communist Party-owned People's Daily republished the Chinese military's official statement on social media, with no additional reports.
CCTV's widely watched daily Xinwen Lianbo evening news broadcast made no mention of the border confrontation on Tuesday.
The foreign ministry's official transcripts of its Tuesday press briefing redacted remarks from its spokesman about the clashes.
The Global Times said in an editorial that China did not disclose the death toll of the confrontation "to avoid comparing and preventing confrontational sentiments from escalating".
"China does not want to turn border issues with India into a confrontation," the editorial said, blaming India for "arrogance and recklessness".
https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/...rted-deadly-ladakh-clash-200617041240570.html
Pan-Islamic-Pakistan
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 28, 2018
- Messages
- 13,153
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
What if Indian Muslims begin protests and civil disobedience movement now that Indian army is distracted?
Will Indian government compromise? Isnt this the same tactic used by Congress during WW2?
Pan-Islamic-Pakistan
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 28, 2018
- Messages
- 13,153
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Same as Turkish hackers who targetted India after lockdown in Kashmir started.
Aspen
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2019
- Messages
- 3,585
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
India doesn't have any Chinese PoW because if they did, Indian media would be howling about it
China will spank you back into the stone age, let's see if IA has the balls to do it
Death Professor
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2018
- Messages
- 2,698
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Ok now you have hurled a blame. Now hope you don't run from it. It was your IAF that claimed they shot an F16, you gave Abhilundon an award on the bases of that, now how are going to prove such a claim when a 3rd unbiased party already said that YOUR claim was cow shit.
U.S. count shows no Pakistan F-16s shot down in Indian battle: report
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ot-down-in-indian-battle-report-idUSKCN1RH0IM
You showed AMRAAM, which we used to shoot down your plane, now did u call russians to check the number of planes for counting, just like we did? WE had nothing to hide, and the one who had to hide has still hidden this basic fact.
Pan-Islamic-Pakistan
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 28, 2018
- Messages
- 13,153
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
faithfulguy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 13,651
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
The Global Times said in an editorial that China did not disclose the death toll of the confrontation "to avoid comparing and preventing confrontational sentiments from escalating".
From this sentence, it’s clear that China achieve exactly what it wants. India should keep quiet so China will return more prisoners.
Pan-Islamic-Pakistan
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 28, 2018
- Messages
- 13,153
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
He is a decent guy and an Indian Muslim.
Aspen
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2019
- Messages
- 3,585
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Beef
faithfulguy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 13,651
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
To Indians, facts do not matter. It’s their narrative that counts. So India claim victory Feb 27th and June 15th alike.
You guys have already fudged the numbers to make yourselves feel better after defeat before
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/india-trying-suppress-military-analysts-twitter-63282
and even claimed to have invented internet 10000 years ago
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/558725/
and just like clockwork after revealed that the Indian casualties topped 40, you revised Chinese casualties to 100+.
But whatever number makes you feel better about your defeat
Pan-Islamic-Pakistan
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 28, 2018
- Messages
- 13,153
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Similar threads
- Article
