What's new

10 captives, Over 20 soldiers, including Commanding Officer killed at Galwan border clash with China

.
China price is competitive due to the industry scale, actually Chinese salary are at least 5 times higher India's, there's talk way before to move out of China to India, but non success

You know China annual steel output are 60% more than the rest of world combined, China consumed more concrete in three years than USA in 100 years in industry revolution, but I guess no use to talk dumb PDF Indian like you only knows jingoism slogans

Plus what end product do you have? I kept hearing boycotting China, what India products can we boycott?

Precisely that is the problem. China invested and build lot of factory and other ghost towns. If no demand, problem will start.
Well all these chinese products are not necessary. We don't depend on any basic need products from China.
 
. .
. .
It ain't happening anymore. They tried whole last year regarding Feb 27 events, but were ridiculed. We, Pakistanis are used to their lies, be it terrorism blame or fake surgical strikes,its just that you Chinese for the first time are actually directly facing it but there are forums like this one, which will uphold the truth and will spread correct information to different social networking websites through her users. You can easily note that India hasn't faced any international backing regarding this incident despite of heavy anti China western media.




It actually suits the West if india is vanquished. india is not going to fight the Chinese on behalf of the West but neither can they allow india to become powerful and have good relations with China either. A strong China/india alliance would further erode Western/European power and influence. A defeated/diminished india would actually benefit Western nations in the long run.
 
. .
No worries India has cheaper wages. Btw, just read that we freed 10 soldiers, 2 majors were released as well. What's your take on that? Lol
his take?: modi showed you his redeye hence you freed them out of fear

Eae7dXAU4AIN9mf.jpg
 
. .
China price is competitive due to the industry scale, actually Chinese salary are at least 5 times higher India's, there's talk way before to move out of China to India for cheaper labor, but non success

You know China annual steel output are 60% more than the rest of world combined, China consumed more concrete in three years than USA in 100 years in industry revolution, but I guess no use to talk dumb PDF Indian like you only knows jingoism slogans

Plus what end product do you have? I kept hearing boycotting China, what India products can we boycott?



indians are good at talking and making ridiculous claims. They are the world's best at it. You can't doubt them for that.
 
. .
It will take sometime. People don't know which are chinese products. There will be massive awareness and campaign. In 6months, you will see the difference. India is self sufficient in basic needs. It is chance for Indian companies to step up and produce other stuff.

in six months Indians will forget what happened and move on, which is why the Chinese government let India decide how many casualties did the Chinese sustain in this fight, your media will keep on saying "we killed 43 of them" every day till you are satisfied, just as how your media kept on saying "we shot down F-16, killed 300 militants in Pakistan".
 
.
It actually suits the West if india is vanquished. india is not going to fight the Chinese on behalf of the West but neither can they allow india to become powerful and have good relations with China either. A strong China/india alliance would further erode Western/European power and influence. A defeated/diminished india would actually benefit Western nations in the long run.

not even a little bit. They’re trying to create a balance of power. West knows India and China can never be friend what with China-pak-India triangle. What they’re to do is create a balance of power. If India one ups China in anything China has to then divert its attention to fill the gap or if there was no gap to maintain its one-up from India. China has to do it otherwise India will start to emerge as a relevant regional power.

it’s like this. If India didn’t existed your country would have a lot of resources to spend on its own people and prosper. But due to its existence u now have to divert a lot of military/financial/and spy resources .

in summary you now have to divert a lot of resources to maintain where u are vs if ur adversary didn’t exist
 
.
TAKEAWAYS FROM THE INDO-CHINA BORDER SKIRMISH IN LADAKH

1. China has outrightly rubbished India's Article 370, which sanctified annexation of Ladakh and its incorporation as a Union Territory. Ladakh is, thus, again a disputed territory up for grabs, according to China.

2. China has found it opportune to gauge the depth of the new-found Indo-US partnership, as well as geo-strategic limitations of the Indo-Pacific region at large.

3. China has put India on a subtle notice to avoid any interference in Pak-China projects like CPEC and Bhasha Dam, irrespective of their location in Gilgit-Baltistan. In future, if India moves against Pakistan in Gilgit-Baltistan, China will move against India in Ladakh (India has to pass through Ladakh to get into Gilgit-Baltistan).

4. By being in Ladakh, China can interfere with India's operations in Siachen.

5. China has rubbed Modi's nose in the wastelands of Galwan Valley, and has made it clear that India is no more than a regional thug. In common parlance, ' .'

6. China has clearly flexed its muscle, and completely ignored the naysayers who questioned its resolve.

7. Kashmir has gone from being a bilateral dispute into a trilateral dispute.

--

Well summed up.
 
.

After 44 died at Pulwama, it took India nearly 2 weeks to carry out an attack upon Pakistan. If more than 44 eventually die as a result of this incident with China, and India does not respond in a kinetic manner, what implications will that have for the Indian military and India in general? Especially because this was LITERALLY at the HANDS of the Chinese military, while Pakistan had nothing to do with Pulwama.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom