Search results

You know what, i give up, you are free to believe whatever you want, i couldn't careless. Every single questions that you asked have been answered before for several page, we even give the equation already , the principal have been explained but you dont even try to understand, you don't...

@Radio : like everyone said, you need to understand what they wrote instead of just quoting without understanding anything at all. It clearly said in the article about quantum satellite that the pair of entangled particles are keep seperate aso that the user know what form of coding they would...

no it isn't , read carefully what they said, you have to understand the difference between the tested satellite and the so called quantum radar system you talking about, they both based on the spin of photon but the way they work is not the same No it isnt and you dont just entangled a...

I would guess he referring to the fact that you have to entangled every photons with ever single wave- particles that the radar emit, much easier said than done Random radio, the system you quoted observed the spin of the photon by emits every single photon at a time, but the requirements...

I did read all your post radio, and they all lack the scientific based.Like i said at the first place, it nothing more than a BS piece of propaganda, may be it can fool people that doesn't understand physics but i doubt that even uni student can be fooled by that crap

No it is not my assumption, they did have an example in the paper that you cited, and in that example the gain of the photoelectric system is lower than normal system Alright radio, you cant just keep making things up as you feel like it, It is very childlike and exposed your lack of...

:coffee: No where does it say you can have OTH at microwave wavelength or that you can overcome things like directivity and attenuation problem, in fact this "photonic radar" seem to have lower gain than normal radar. The only major advantage that they talk about is wide bandwidth, and that...

@Radio :No where does it say this new system can see thounsands km aways or look inside aircraft weapons bay or that it doesn't following normal physics

Iam new here but I have been reading Picdelamirand-oil posts for a while, there is no way he worked for Dassault, he is just a guy who happened to read some research papers and know some scientists sounding words and that it, he made some very amateur mistake when he tries to talk...

The aircraft is like 2km from the FLIR , no amount of IR suppression can help in that case. And even radar will see it at that distance too. What surprise me is that the airframe is very dark , almost blend in with dark sky background. Even a tank look brighter than that

Dammm, that is the best source i have ever seen, seem very professional and details

Why do they care if there are bee on the aircraft ? what they gonna do ? sting the aircraft to death ?