Search results

Only BS in the article is Stall !!!! Everything else is true. IAF want the timeline in writing for obvious reasons and HAL doesnt want that for obvious reasons :rofl: Solution came out as increased off-shelf deliveries to maintain Sqd numbers. But nothing come out of MOD since. apparently I...

@sancho : what will be sacrificed to achive mini version. Payload ???

God dam IEDs RIP

This mission will add colourful feathers to ISRO. I guess we have to wait few more weeks to get snaps of Mars trip :cheers:

Last time a US Cop was arrested on Indian airport for carrying live ammunition few of the Pak members gone ballistic over the action and defination of live ammo. And now Pak doing the same thing :pakistan: I hope @sandy_3126 @Abingdonboy remember the thread :p:

B-2 is Quite a sight !!! But why ??? Seems like US doesn't want the tensions to calm down @gambit

RIP to pilot .

SSBN hide itself from other hunters and its main purpose is to deliver BMs from secure location. They are generally bigger in size as they have BM. SSN are hunters which are hunt down enemy subs and ships and patrol waters. They are faster and sustain long enough in deep water without have to...

:p::p::p: Every plane will be caught on radar be it 3rd gen or 5th LO or VLO. The point is when. Shaping consists of not more than 50% rest is sensor fusion and radar absorbing coating and use of composites, IR suppression, engine exposer and weapon bays . Western ideology is to sneak in as...

Same here why don't you understand Russian air warfare tactics are different from west. 80% stealth is shaping. Lets agree on that. So you are saying J-20 is 80 of 80 and Pak-Fa will be ????? Give a number for argument. And do see the chart Sancho created for 5th gen ac characteristics.

Don't worry our reactor tech is safe and we are making reactors from decades. Main challenge was to miniaturise them to fit in a tube. Rest is proven and time tested. First four will be of same series 3 n 4 is said to be slightly bigger.

Do you understand you are using one logic to flagship China and rejecting same logic for Russia !!!! In short WS-10A can mature but not T-50 :rofl: guess why ??? What can I say about that !!! Good Luck. I rest my case

Last I heard ( about 2/3 years ago ) SSN was also secretly in development but nothing official/unofficial or even rumour about it. In theory we should be able to build SSN with the help of SSBN & and Russian SSN in hand but thats a theory nothing more

On contrary , the reactors will be fastest part of the project for obvious reason. More time will be needed for construction. It is said that more powerful design is being made for next series of SSBNs which will be bigger than Arihant class

Construction is said to be complete unofficially but the reactor will take some time and my guess is it will take minimum one year. First one took about 20 months. Unofficially 3 reactors are ready.

Seriously !!!! Second one is almost complete but third is still in primary stage. Not expected before 2018 No its smaller in size & fire power

Thats Sad !!!!

By 2015 second SSBN INS Aridaman is supposed to be in Harbour trials :p::p::p:

You want to call WS-10A a success !!! Your defination of success is wrong. I know Russia is not SU but they have success of su-30 with legacy of Su-27 And what China has ??? Techno growth is exponential and its true for all. Be it USA , Russia or China . China has more money to invest doesn't...

You quoted me I did not :woot: Yur comprehension is not my problem. Its your problem :rofl: So which one of the fighter has AESA :coffee: ??? Do you remember what topic is it ??? I am just replying a member who has claimed something. Go tell him to stick to topic :o: Better avoid me :rofl...