But it isn't coming from Pakistan's side at all. The BBC is not Pakistani and neither is the Edgeware Police Station of the London Met Police.
Unless you mean to say that the documents are forged.
Malala's efforts are undoubtedly admirable and she is definitely not a CIA agent, but there are some legitimate issues of her narrative being hijacked.
The article didn't address all the statements about Pakistan in 'her' book.
I was greatly disappointed when I read things like ''people in...
Bhai jaan, other explanations would be based on theories about the entire British government, police and judiciary being involved in some grand conspiracy against MQM. Of course my heart does not believe that.
MQM could still serve as a counter force if it moves on, and if the educated elements of the MQM take over the party from the thugs that currently control it. In fact they'll become a much more effective counter force if they do so.
Like I said, Mir's revelations alone wouldn't have been enough...
Because that is infinitely more likely than the idea of the entire British government conspiring with the Pakistani Establishment to destroy MQM, or the idea that the ISI controls the London police and BBC.
The reason money laundering issue was not raised before this was that they didn't have reliable evidence. These statements by Tariq Mir may have been enough to grant them a search warrant but not enough to start a money laundering case.
If you read through the documents, you will see that a...
Already been posted and discussed. No need to make three new threads about it.
Why China Snubbed India on a Pakistan-based Terrorist at the UN
Why China Snubbed India on a Pakistan-based Terrorist at the UN
No contradiction bhai jaan, in the UK they have something called due process. Their system involves a lot of paperwork and some preliminary evidence, indication or reasoning is required for them to obtain search warrants. This was part of the case that let them raid the office in the first place.
This was most likely how they got to conducting the raid on 6th December 2012 in the first place. They would't have just raided the office just like that, they had reason to believe MQM was involved in money laundering. Now we know what that reason was, or at least part of it.
They obviously...
That is a valid argument. But the burka in itself is not anti-Islamic. Sometimes women want to wear it for perfectly legitimate reasons and they should be allowed to do so. It does not deny the ladies any rights unless it is forcefully imposed, which would be anti-Islamic indeed.
That was just...
Language bhai jaan. Edit your post. There are a lot better ways to argue with these kinds of Indian trolls without stooping down to their level. This kind of language only makes you look bad.
A burka is not anti-Islamic, for God's sake, not even the shuttlecock burkas that cover the face entirely. But it is not Islamic either. Covering of the face was a limited directive issued specifically to the Prophet's wives in a specific time period.
As per Islam, all women do not have to wear...
Oh really? Remember when India trained and armed the LTTE, the inventors of suicide vests and 'pioneers' of terrorism?
And remember when these Tigers turned against India? Can't keep snakes and expect them to only bite your Sri Lankan neighbors now can you? Indians and their hypocritical...