Search results

If that was the case, they would be no Indian TTs. But there are. You are welcome to see it however you like, however. Like I said, no one's forcing you to stay.

Yes, but at the end of the day it boils down to opinion. The criteria for a positive rating would be ''high-quality''. Someone may think that a post is high-quality while someone else may disagree. As for the negative rating I gave, pure trolling and nonsensical statements undoubtedly do fit...

I never said India doesn't have good UAVs. I said they wouldn't want to use those for everything because they are expensive and not expendable. Just because we have artillery doesn't mean we stop using pistols and rifles. The same applies here.

Complain on the Management Boards if you have that much of a problem. It is upto title-holders to decide what rating they want to give to posts, provided they fit a criteria. If you think your post doesn't fit said criteria, you can complain to the mods. There are plenty of Indian nonsense...

Yes. The DJI Phantom is comparatively low-cost when compared to DRDO's drones. From where pigeon arrived in this discussion? From the fact that Indians were defending their BSF when they claimed a pigeon can be a spy but these same Indians are having difficulty believing that a spy drone is...

'Chinese UAV' 'Chinese UAV', Indians buy plenty of these Chinese UAVs. The Army doesn't need to buy them from the Police or from China They are commercially available. You may not be educated enough to understand what that, so i'll show you a picture: They are available in India too...

A drone with all those specs will cost a lot. On the other hand, a simple commercially available drone does the job at a lower cost, and is expendable. Doesn't have to be a massive acquisition for it to be used this way.

Arre yaar, India could easily use it as a low-cost and expendable surveillance tool. A milspec drone being shot down is a big loss, a commercially available drone is not. If Pakistan can use a pigeon as a spy, what's so difficult to believe about a drone with a camera on it being used as a spy?

They are available for purchase in India Dji Phantom DJI Phantom 3 Professional 4K With Bill

Matter of fact is that this drone is commercially available and operated by not just Pakistani state agencies but many worldwide, ranging from the media to tourists. It is possible that this drone was operated by a civilian, from either side of the border. But it is also very possible that...

Yet another thread hijacked for Indian trolling, mental masturbation and Pakistan bashing. This bull about it being a Pakistani Police drone is bull because the police don't operate so close to the borders, especially not Azad Kashmir and the LOC. The other bull about it being the Pakistan...

''Greatest proof'' my (back)side. Pakistani police don't operate near the borders. This drone is commercially available. That means anyone can buy it. Indian forces could be using it as a low-cost surveillance tool.

First of all, MQM's voter base is not ''public sentiment at large''. Yes, MQM does have legitimate public support in Karachi - but that does not give them the right to commit crimes and harbour a militant wing. What you are calling 'public perception' at this point is full of twisted...

@yoshi.oda Welcome to the forum. Have a good time here.

So at the end of the day we have two proposed solutions - it is now simply a matter of someone taking the initiative to implement either of them. I still stand by my argument that secularism doesn't solve the issues and only absolves governments of the responsibility to solve them; which is why...

Is it any more unrealistic than convincing all those ulema to accept Pakistan's secularization? No, not at all. The common grounds exist, and the ulema exist. All that is needed is initiative and will. But somehow the ancient Greek invention of Democracy from over a thousand years ago was a...

Congratulations. Salute to your brother.:tup:

http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/304/media/images/57178000/jpg/_57178119_57178118.jpg Exactly. It isn't his money, it is his talent and fame that people care for. No one would care for Imran if he was just some rich guy. Nobody can climb up without having to deal with slander and allegations...

Is that the only argument you have against my ideas? Just because something hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it is impossible or hopeless. Saying it is ''futile to expect it'' is a very fallacious way of dismissing a perfectly valid solution.

Most of these sources are Anti-Islam propaganda. How do you expect me to take a source that repeatedly says ''murderous Mohammed'' seriously? How can you, as a Muslim accept that as truth? If you believe them, you are arguing that Islam itself is violent and oppressive - in which case there...