Search results

No, no it isn't. NA 246 has been in MQM's control for a long time. That is MQM's backyard. It is the center of MQM's political activities. That is where the most MQM supporters are concentrated, that is where their HQ is located and that is where MQM focuses the most. Not such a good test case...

Correction of mistakes is already happening. This time we have physical evidence and video footage, not just rumours of maps. And this time the Army is involving and helping strengthen the civilian authorities, while simultaneously working on their own internal accountability. Sure, there's...

Start a thread with a poll over here if you want to and stop arguing over pointless numbers. You can bring six to seven people, I know of sixteen to seventeen people who say the exact opposite. You will then say you know sixty to seventy people - either start a poll, or stop arguing over such...

Picking on specific points helps in making accurate responses, I apologize if I missed any of the points raised. As for Jinnahpur, what can we do when certain people insist on beating the same old dead horse? Otherwise, bilkul sahi kaha aap ne, aaj ki baat ziyada zaroori hai.

I never avoided the past. Read: What track record? Their leadership changed half a dozen times after that! MQM's remained the exact same. And now the MQM is having the same problem, yet again. Do you people never wonder why exactly does the MQM end up getting 'targeted'? And no, it's not...

Two persons on PDF hold just as much, if not more, credibility than some random ''families in the US'' from Karachi as cited by @taimur12 Laugh at him if you want to. NA 246 does not equal Karachi, and MQM doesn't equal all Mohajirs. 95 thousand people can love MQM as much as they like, I...

They actually raided the office, twice. Rangers raid Sunni Tehreek office again, confiscate records - The Express Tribune They also confiscated records - I'm sure the records weren't just lying nearby their HQ. That still doesn't justify what was found in 90. By this logic if weapons are found...

That is the key argument, and you apparently knowing some families from Karachi means nothing. @haviZsultan is from Karachi and so is @waleed3601 . Both do not support MQM. Your perspective is no more 'realistic' than theirs. Bull. First of all, none of this absolves MQM of its crimes. The...

Unfortunately, yes. Obviously there are degrees of it. Many people do subscribe to parts of the narrative but they don't try to justify mass murder - others, like Abdul Aziz, do try to justify murder. The former are obviously not as dangerous as the latter.

No, no I don't. There are many other evils in Karachi. But MQM is one of them. Or at least elements within MQM, elements which are defended by Altaf Hussain. You can not just absolve them of their crimes by saying that ''others are doing it too''. Whether MQM has delivered or not is another...

In this particular case, I would define it as: Someone who has a soft corner for the terrorists and their ideology/narrative and attempts to propagate it. That narrative being that the Pakistani State has wronged its Pakhtuns and Tribals under orders from the West and that it must be fought...

I've been going through some of the comments on Dawn and it appears most people on there either misinterpret the satire or deliberately misrepresent certain arguments. It is very important that we do not apologise for terrorists. But we must be careful so as to not throw the term around too...

Hilarious. :lol: Yet sends an important message. I've been labelled a ''Wahabi Kafir'' by certain Barelvis for not agreeing with the prophecies and methods prescribed by certain Pirs more times than I can count. They tend to throw the term around very much, even though it shouldn't be used...

Since you said absolutely nothing to argue against me, I'll assume you're laughing at yourself. As for your question, yes, the soldier being part of the Rangers, Mujahid force, Army or any other military or paramilitary changes absolutely nothing about the situation as long as it's a part of...

These firearm enthusiasts will also tell you that using a video of a small object being shot using a shotgun and extrapolating it to a larger object being shot using a rifle is not an accurate way of determining how damaged something should be. As for more damage by the crash, these things are...

Mentioning who shot it has nothing to do with trying to prove anything. Do you have any actual refutation? Do you see any flaws in my comparison of the two images? Tamilian sayings don't qualify as actual arguments. I can go on and on with Urdu and Punjabi sayings about some of the brainwashed...

Who declared it a fact? That is your belief. There is evidence both for and against it. That means it is not a 'fact'. fact noun a thing that is known or proved to be true.

There is nothing racist about that post. I was talking about Indians, as in, the country India. It would be racist if I commented on your colour or physical features, which I haven't.

Whatever it was, it was a lot more logical than what was going on in the mind of your BSF when they decided to arrest pigeons on multiple occasions. It is not ''so intact''. It is in pieces. Let's compare two photos: one from your video, and one from the ISPR: The second one is much...

Then no need for you to complain on this thread either, now is there?