Agree to disagree. Bengalis had their own dirty role as well. You can teach what ever narrative you want to your people as that is you business but do remember we will not take the Victor's History as face value... and this is what burns Bangladesh....that we do not accept 100% your version of...
People only think that (West)Pakistanis had an air of ethnic nationalism against the East Pakistanis whereas they don't realise that Bengalis were way more proud of their own ethnic nationalism...
Bravo! Well said. Although I would say forgive but not forget.
The heartland of the Sikh empire was Lahore if I'm not mistaken.
Pakistani history doesn't start with British India as some Pakistanis may think.
Persian was banned by the British. Punjabi was spoken as well as a local language and...
History is written by the Victors.
Pakistan army is meant to have killed 3 million civilians whilst fighting on all fronts against rebels backed by Bharat in 9 months. Sure maybe 3 million were killed but Pakistan Army could not physically do this.
Bengalis and Biharis loyal to Pakistan were...
Irrespective of colonialism which is a great factor....the world of Islamic Scholarship as a whole is shambolic......of course there are exceptions....
If Islam has allowed flexibility in a matter it is dangerous for a State to narrow that flexibility especially when that State is not run by qualified people despite calling itself Islamic.
Like I said my worry is not just marriage bill but in general.
This can provoke a major backlash and...
You are correct that most 13 years old are not ready, hell most 22 year olds are not ready. But does that mean the State ought to raise the age to say 24.
Cos there are exceptions. There may be a small minority of under 18 year old who are ready mentally and the State would then prevent this...
Forbidding what is permissible is the issue. Advising against something that is permissible is a completely different thing. This is the issue. What the State ought to do is educate people on the sensible way of marrying of their children and preventing them from being exploited for money...
So when the State says no drinking that is because that Islam says no to drinking. So there is no conflict.
But when it comes to other issues like this child marriage business...Islam is more diverse on this matter about the age of marriage....Islam does not say minimum age is 18 or 16 or 21...
Yeah. To bring back the Caliphate to what it was in the Rightly Guided Era is not going to happen with Imran Khan. I personally think only the Imam Mahdi will do this HOWEVER Pakistan can be working towards such a goal in the meantime such as what you have mentioned.... and I would suggest that...
Europe is socialist...already....the EU(SSR)
People don't seem to understand this point....he was forced into declaring war on the US...which is what the powers that be wanted and if had not then the US would have carried on arming Germany's enemies whilst still being "neutral".....
I understand where you are coming from but my worry is general and not specific to this marriage issue. The State ought to be very careful when "legislating" on certain matters especially if the State calls itself Islamic.
My personal feeling is that Dajjal who is the master mind behind Modern...
Well I think from an Islamic perspective the State does not need to be involved in the marriage.
You just need bride and groom along with witnesses and guardians and that is it.
Perhaps others can shed more light on the jurisprudence of this?
I personally understand why the State is doing this...
As slaves????
No thanks! !!
Those hordes became part of Pakistan and Bharat after a great period of tumult.
The current hordes ain't the same plus not everything our hero's did was good.
Optimism is good but only when NATO leaves and Afghanistan accepts the Durand Khan border and all illegal...
He is a minority. I have met Afghans in the UK whilst civil with me and even pay for food when out, still see Pakistan as occupying Afghan land.
Pakistanis ought not to be so easily swayed....remember Pakistan needs to deal with Afghanistan on a State level...
Yeah and what about the...
Well co terminous Afghanistan was part of many Persian speaking empires for longer than any part of India (British) was part of Persian speaking empires. But more than India many ethnic Persians also lived in Afghanistan and still do, they are just called Tajiks. It was when the Hotak and...