Search results

i am a atheist myself, but i do belive god exists & i would never hurt a innocent & would go very far to forgive people who have done bad things to me, but thats just me though, but would stand up for whats right. Saud's have gone too far & they knew the consequences very well but still choose...

some are more fortunate than others, no one had issue's with their wh0ring business, it all got ugly when some direct actions of theirs started terrorsing every single human on this planet & what is really more surprising is they have a cheek to deny their acts stating ohh wahabi/salafi ideology...

may be a war was threatened but look at the brighter side it bought enormous wealth & prosperity to saudi's, what really matters is how that wealth was used saudi's are really answerable, saudi has been terrorising whole world with its wahabi/salafi ideology thts what really matters to common...

petro dollar was good thing to happen to KSA, but we are debating on the issues after petro dollar things that really matter to common joe is terrorism etc & to be honest no body really cares about who's got more money what really matters is when the individual freedom is threatend by these...

why would ksa for that matter will not agree to US petro dollar, who will supply those expensive ****** to the house of saud?

good gun, why can't india manufacture its own?

does might US of A really need to size those oil wells ? really? they already belong to them.

once isaf leaves afgun, all those billion dollar investments will go in a plume of smoke.

i say good move by china

this last major offensive is nothing but early withdrawl of isaf forces from afgunistan, too much innocent blood is lost here.

us & nato would prefer to leave afghanistan before things get ugly, the recent attacks on embassy shows the incompetence of ISAF meanwhile Australian troops to leave Afghanistan a year earlier than planned, Prime Minister Julia Gillard says - CBS News as we can see the end game in afghanistan...

the point being made here is India buys arms & co-operates with russia in some technologicaly so it can never be an ally/partner with india's no1 arch enemy i.e pakistan. well say if the above statement is true by all means: in this scenario India buys arms from israel & usa an arch enemy of...

true, after the afgun fiasco ruskies have realised diplomacy is much betta than force, it's a classic case of if option 1 does not work, why not try option 2, i dont see anything wrong here. ill take that as a compliment :smitten:

Russia needs warm water port, by the look of it only pakistan can provide it.

read my post clearly, it says giving fair share of their resources in terms of development & technology, it will also help india to keep a check on china, developed burma is in india's interest. just to make things clear, i dont support any nation here, my views are clearly neutral.

Burma is resource rich & india benefits a lot more than any other country, hope the burmese get the fair share of development in exchange of its resources.

i was thinking on the same lines.

is this really true?

read the above quote, there is no assurance or safety here, it would be one more expensive environment disaster in making.

any source for this plz?