Search results

Where am I saying that Palestine has no right to exist but they should also recognise jews claim on jerusalem. Please don't bring religion into this because you don't know there are various religious site in India which are disputed between Hindus and muslims but apart from Babri Mosque nothing...

With this attitude Palestinian will also loss West bank and Gaza. Jews had lived second class life through out in History. They will not agree on it. After all agreement is more in fever of Arabs than Jews.

Nothing clever in it. It is clear by past that If Israel will become defensive then arabs will crush them. Then only one possible solution is 2 state solution with complete jerusalem in Israel. It should be accepted by each Arab country at least.

With this attitude it is quite clear that You people never recognised Israel by heart, then how can you expect support from the world for you people.

jerusalem is already in their hand. I am only saying that palestenian should also agree with two state solution in which jerusalem should remain with Israel. Why you people attacked different regions and captured them . Same is happening with you people then you are having problem with that.

However I am not Sikh but I would not like what you told. You are not getting my point Jews were before muslims so their right on jerusalem is more then muslims. Your holiest place is mecca which you already have . Christian's holiest place is vatican city which they already have. Now jews...

Any one should be allowed to visit there but it should remain under possession of Israel , because they don't have any other holy place.

using same theory china is keeping east turkistan and tibbet.:D

That is correct but Indian civilization is older than mughal empire so they can't claim but jews existed before muslims and palestine was their holy land. think buddy you people have mecca christian have vatican city just live jerusalem to the jews.;)

What mongolia? please elaborate..

Absolutely Correct Mr. Nishan, Same is the case with Israel. When muslims displaced Jews from their holy land then they never thought that Jews will ever take it back. But see now...:D

I can assume that 60 fought against 50000 . But 60 can't defeat 50000 people. Similar case is in History of Sikhs in which aurangzeb send a army of more than 100000 to kill Guru Govind Singh but 46 Sikhs fought with that huge army and 42 martyred. But they got their objective to save "Guru"...

I don't remember from when I admire Israel. But reason is 6 day war in which Israel crushed 6 aggressors in only 6 days.

muslims are in every state and in every city of India. Not only in gujrat.

I also think. Lahore and karachi were hindu majority. Now hindus are non-existent in two cities.

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

Buddy That is not my statement but Nahraf statement. One question :- How to start a new thread?

But why in case of pakistan hindus are poor . they are not any significant position. Like you said :- Hindus are poor in pakistan. Poor don't have busy and interesting life so they stay home and have babies. Then why there fertility rate is not more than muslims.?

The riot was not anti-muslim but was Anti-Hindu. At that day ram Barat was scheduled but muslims didn't allow to pas the Barat. In that riot Muslims burned and looted many Hindu's shop. Nothing happened to muslims.

Why are iterating same useless talk. You know that after destruction of babri masjid several hindu temples were destroyed in Pak in retaliation. But fact of the matter is if muslims are under the tyrant rule of hindus then why there population is increasing day by day. If hindus are living a...