Search results

F-22 stealthy or not, I don't know. It had not been tested in real war or approved by 3rd party other than buyer and maker. The RCS @ specified band of F-22 is classified, we don't know. They covered it as top secret and bubbles cannot "bang".

Your sick IQ thought F-22 is stealthy first, then applied all your the said theories. Like you shoot first, then coil the hole with a score 10. F-117 got wings, v-tails, your rules worked. B-2 got wings only, your rules continue worked. F-22 got wings, H-tabs, V-tails, your magic rules worked...

It is your stupid-proud out-of-date aviation maintenance experiences confused you. That makes you don't know what you're talking about. Stealth is nothing to do with manoeuvrability of an aircraft which is born to fly. Anything for stealth is at cost of manoeuvrability, and vice versa. How to...

Since those magic engineer can control the quantity, array, modes of radiation well on two giant wings of F-22/35, why so difficult on two small canards? Hi, troller, your $%$ rules are jokes to me: yours rules followed F-22/35, not F-22/35 followed the rules. Anything F-22/35 have, they are...

So the gaps on J-20 are acceptible by you. I tell why, not because of the bullish*t stealth rules and laws, it because F-22/35 have those gaps. For your information, J-20 has less gaps than the failed F-22 and worse than failed F-35. Even you can answer why they are failed. Copy of not from...

Yep, J-20 does have. Don't compare the J-20 with F-22 (a failed project) and F-35 (worse than fail). Look at it, what a joke. Asymmetric face and body.

You rules can only be filtered by J-20 two canards and bypassed by two giant wings of F-22.

:flame::flame::big_boss::big_boss::big_boss::big_boss:

Thanks to only-for-none-Chinese physics, F-22 deserves the legend forever, yeh!!!

Don't expect US or his son NATO will set up a no-fly zone over Ukraine by F-22. F-22 is a legend. Legend cannot be shot down. Otherwise, the legend will be discovered fake and whole system collapse. You can you up, no can no BB ---- to F-22.

My mistake, apologize. Quoted the PDV wrongly. The PDV radar showed to public as posted above: You may find the interesting what the awesome Indian's engineer were doing: they simply enlarged the radar disk base on PAD which has Russia blood. 1) Did not increase power wattage, they may share...

Don't fool yourself by the hot land. You don't have semi-conductor industry to produce the most advance seeker. If you can, then you're not DRDO, you're USDO. ciao.

PDV is India's version of Arrow with borrowed guiding system from Arrow-II. PDV Arrow-II Even Israel has no ability to produce IR seeker and radar for Arrow-2. They are both made in US from Raytheon and LM. PDV should has it's downgrade version IR from Israel, and radar guide system are...

Please, don't fool yourself with Indian's science. Don't talk about the engineering if you are not engineering based.

Had you destroyed? China launched either from land to sea, or from sea to land. This is the next step India need to go.

Things are not as you thought. As having no enough space, your target missile had to fly curved as shown in purple. It's mountain different from the real world.

I'm really confused if you are not so. Didn't I compare your PDV vs THAAD, HQ-9? Where is the magic " a ballistic missile with 1 ton load capacity "? China can easily achieve a 5000km route for ballistic missile launched from east to west. Same case for US. Russia can easily achieve ICBM test...

IR imaging sensor.

It's not a KKV. You read wrongly about "not a good kkv system". That's important to estimate where the opponent did go. Where is the capable ballistic missile? Hope you're not drunk right now. You read wrongly again. It's not 2000km range ABM, it's about the coming MRBM. Totally negative...

Some of Chinese professional considered it's a failure test. 1) PDV is not KKV which means hit-to-kill. The accuracy of +/-0.05m rocket controlling (a must for KKV missile) is obviously out of India's industrial capacity. The declared 6 previous "successful" test are badly suspected. 2) Radar...