Shouldn't have supported the Taliban then.
Look at Pakistan, consider it jihad to prop up barbaric taliban in Afghanistan but want to kill taliban in Pakistan.
Cant say about Nepal and Bhutan.
But Bangladesh surely is a bigger power than Pakistan, same population and a higher economic growth rate with no terrorism.
And not only that, Bangladesh has higher potential than Pakistan with its export orientation and a much better literacy and social...
Again, slight handed attempts by Pakistanis to show others in equal light.
Pakistanis would indeed have a right to blame India for Peshawar when Indian citizens are the ones who are caught going around wielding AK-47's and their handlers sit in India directing the attacks.
Because such was the...
No, certainly not.
Muslims are paragons of virtue in terms of integrating with host societies and not trying to change those societies into medieval barbarian zones.
European 'No-Go' Zones for Non-Muslims Proliferating
You are now entering Sharia law Britain: As Islamic extremists declare a...
I am being honest and it is the truth.
The phrase "for no good reason" does not apply. I said 'deliberately', not "for no good reason". A world of difference between the two.
I am relaxed my friend, I passed my worries and concerns to the GoI when I went out of my way to vote for them and...
Desert fox, if you still need Bharatis to strengthen the unity of Pakistanis then you as a nation have failed.
As a nation you have failed to find common ground between your people and shared ideals which everyone aspires to- if the only ideals you have come up in 70 years is being anti-x/y/z...
I would appreciate that you don't put words in my mouth.
I did not say that India is being aggressive towards Pakistan "for no good reason"
The majority of Indians felt that the last GoI's response and behaviour to Pakistan was incorrect and far too weak. Therefore as is a democracy, the new...
What you are talking about is the last Government of India's policy - that of taking Pakistan along to increase international standing.
The current GoI has decided on "everything minus Pakistan" formula in foreign policy as is evident in each of our regional relationship policies. We are no...
The solution to point 2 is simple, as I mentioned.
Pakistan can simply choose not to use the SAARC satellite. Therefore cutting off access is a point that does not arise.
I personally am in favour of Pakistan not joining the project. The Prime Minister in his bluster announced the SAARC...
And yet, that is what Sea Laws are governed by being a signatory.
Pakistan cannot change the laws. They are here to stay and they allow India full use of transit rights over Pakistani EEZ.
The Chinese or even the Martians cannot come and change that. Neither our ships nor our pipelines can be...
This is a Dharmic state, expecting to be allowed to slaughter cows is equivalent to allow drawing Mohammad images in a Muslim state.
The people of the Dhamic faiths do not like the slaughter of cows, therefore it will be banned. The process of individual states banning it has started, it will...
Sorry, but Pakistan can do absolutely zilch against Myanmar as long as China(primarily) and India(secondarily) stand beside Myanmar.
Myanmar trades massively with China and India and as long as we continue to trade with them, any other sanction means absolutely nothing in real terms.
We along...
1. Pakistan does not have the technological or technical ability to lead the sat project.
2. Pakistan's fears are illegitimate as what space assets can be used against Pakistan are being used against Pakistan. India now has one of the worlds largest satellite networks in orbit - both remote...
Why not ?
KSA could believe rightly that people of Pakistan are far more loyal to KSA than to Pakistan. And the Government/State of Pakistan has nothing to do with this love for KSA...and is therefore not required to be an intermediary.
Even if Pakistan as a state weakens or even...