Search results

Lol, you saying Liquid fuel ICBM is not possible for deterrence or MAD. Unable to grasp your own argument? Or an explosion above 10 KM from ground in Shanghai distinguish this is boosted fission or fusion. Or that missile filled with liquid fuel or solid? Start to think about it, thats why...

So Silo based ICBM filled with which fuel? Before banging your head on wall do some research.

India never developed or targeted any warhead or nukes against US. It was & is Chinese plan. And before you remain on this idiotic course. watch this

But Mk.1 & Mk.1A already started to replace MiG-27. Current configuration of MK2? Did the first prototype even flown? How you know Mk2 configuration? Or you have some very deep relations in ADA? And, btw, I never said India buy Gripen NG. Read the above reply again.

Firstly, you already assumed Mk.2 is dead. Clear that why & how it is dead? And how you assuming F-16 is chosen, any authenticity in this?

And why F-16? Why not Gripen NG then? Buy every single engine aircraft in world. And fuk the logistics like India done in 80s. When there are solutions which are offered by Indian OEM, still we seeing foren? Why?

And why? 6 squadrons are enough to replace MiG-23, MiG-27 & MiG-21? Also for what G414 bought? You think IAF satisfy without IRST in LCA? No they dont, and there is huge requirement of Mk2 in IAF.

You think miniaturization only work by changing whole warhead design? Lol, sometimes RV become heavier than warhead. In that sense, China is doomed since 1980, you think 300 warheads enough against western powers? Also that 300 warheads counted how much Pu China have, not on basis of...

He said clearly, in IAF sense, there is no Mk.1 and Mk.2. They want 6 squadrons that is ready now.

Even if not upgraded the warhead. If you put your head you should know how much devastation a 250 KT boosted fission blasted at 10 KM above the ground could have.

No, did any official statement coming from MoD about F-16? And CAS last year cleared the IAF stance about LCA, that initially they want to induct 6 squadrons that met IAF standards i.e. MK1A. Where is the ambiguity? Things are clear as hell.

There is nothing secret in modern world when thousands of life flying at 35,000 feet, and to save them you have to declare No fly zone before conducting the test. Also for deterrence to work you have to declare your capabilities. CBM my foot, and India capable to read NAVAREA warnings. Also...

F-16 started there MLU in 90s? What you talking about? That not going to happen , if China was interested in resolving those then it already happened by 2013. Also whoever said this Mk1A not going to be ready by 2024, is moron of highest order. It best ready for induction by 2019.

If deal is only about 36 Rafale, then why establishing Indian assembly line by pvt. players, why upgrading Airbases, why buying MRO. That is not financially feasible. There will be some commonality between SU-30 MKI, Rafale and LCA. Like targeting pod. But that is unlikely that Rafale come...

More than 1 vendor? But we already selected Rafale from more than 1 vendor. There is no logical sense to going back to that process again.

Not negotiation tactics. It was just news crap. You think negotiations depend on news crap? SecDef came here for much bigger issues.

F-16? For what LCA Mk2 is under R&D?

Your point?

Mig-29 K is VTOL? And yes they abandoned VTOL.

But he saying total 30 aircrafts including MiG-29K, ASW & AEW helis. Instead of abusing others, start to work on your facts. Start to live in realities, instead of la la land, like AMCA will complete by 2026.