Search results

Yes, but Pakistani Shias are not striking Pakistani Sunnis with impunity the way the vice versa is happening. Iran has nothing to do with this. I have criticized Iran for their meddling in Pakistan and in GCC countries, but the killings in Parachinar have nothing to do with them, and has...

They are banned organizations. Batao kitne logon ko kitne saalon mein maara. Numbers mein baat karo. Batao kitne terrorist attacks kiye itne saalon mein. Do teen qise suna kar khush ho gaye, wah bhai wah! Unke ban hone se kya hota he, khule aam ye log apni tanzeem chalate hein, inke tum jese...

Aray bhai, Sipah-e-Mohammad is a banned organization, I agree. There are banned Shia organizations in Pakistan. What I asked you was, how many terrorist attacks have Shias or Shia organizations carried out in Pakistan? Kitni dafa poochta rahoon ye sawaal, jawab bhi de do yaar. Mujhe Indian ya...

History, but carrying out attacks within Pakistan with impunity. Good job!

So why does it matter if their leaders are dead? There are new leaders now, there are new operatives; and the organization is well and alive, carrying out terrorist attacks inside the country. I believe you don't follow news channels and papers, if you did, you'd know the number of attacks they...

What do you mean they are eliminated by Punjab police? Who has been eliminated? Why are they still carrying out frequent attacks inside Pakistan if they are eliminated?

That alone shows how serious this operation is. The number of terrorists killed is going down, terrorism and casualties from terrorism is rising again. Any operation which results in frequent major attacks throughout the country is a failure. I don't know why the posters here are saying...

The fact that you are trying to justify the killing of innocent Pakistani citizens by bringing up Iran shows that is futile talking to you. I asked you if you could point to any terrorist attack by these people. You had no answer. If these guys do fight in Syria, but are peaceful law abiding...

What toothless beast? Banned militant organizations operate freely in Pakistan, and people like Mullah Abdul Aziz air their views openly. They support the likes of al-Qaeda and ISIS. I cannot believe that people are trying to justify the violence of ISIS, al-Qaeda and other groups against...

The concept is the same bhai. If you need permission to go to Syria to protect the Prophet(S)'s family's shrines; you need state permission to go to the Holy Kabah and Masjid-un-Nabvi too. But I assure you people will not get state permission for that.

If no more armed militias, then the state needs to protect the people of Parachinar against terrorists, which they have been failing to do. Can state policy be wrong? Would you support a state policy that does not provide adequate protection to innocent civilians in a certain city, but...

I do not use the word "genocide" to refer to Shia killings. However, it is wrong to suggest that if the Pakistan Army/forces weren't there, Shias would be exterminated. Parachinaris know how to protect themselves and fight. Turis are battle-hardened people, that only disarmed at the request of...

India se bhi gae hein Shia. Har jagah se gaye hein. Anyways, what does your post have anything to do with Pakistan or Parachinar? Are you saying the state will refuse to provide protection to Pakistani citizens (who haven't engaged in any terrorist activities) from terrorists? Just to play...

Arre bhai, mein zyada lambi guftugu nahin karna chahta, magar ye Shia jo Shaam ja rahe hein, ye Hazrat Zainab (Rasool (S) ki nawasi) ke mazaar ke tahufuz ke liye ja rahe hein; jis per hamla ho raha he. Agar Masjid-Nabvi ya Kabah pe hamla ho, to saare Musalman uth kar uske tahafuz ke liye...

Examples? How many terrorist attacks have they conducted in Pakistan, against Pakistani civilians or security personnel or institutions? What do you mean? How?

You still haven't responded to my post. Tumhe kya chul he ke Pakistan ke bahar kya ho raha he? As long as they don't commit terrorism within Pakistan, hell with what they do outside the country. The Pakistani state has a responsibility to protect Pakistani civilians that do not engage in...

So you're admitting this could have been an FC inside job? The security forces have a duty to protect Pakistani citizens, if they are neglecting their duties, or letting terrorists wreck havoc; then they are complicit in this terrorism.

The PNS Mehran was an "inside job". Just because a few personnel were complicit does not mean the institution is complicit. I have never said the FC as an institution is complicit, only a few personnel might be. And remember that these were one-time attacks, not like Parachinar that has been...

Aray bhai, jawab to de do. How many of these "Iran agents" have been responsible for terrorism inside Pakistan? Tumhe kya chul he what is happening in countries besides Pakistan? Why are you equating terrorists with these so-called Iran agents?

The Lashkar-e-Jhangvi al Alami has accepted responsibility for these Parachinar attacks.