The difference ofcourse being that he had no clue what Pakistan was even meant to be, he just came to loot and expand his territory. I don't know why we think our identity is linked to religion only. If you think Pakistanis are just subcontinental Muslims it'd be disappointing to hear there's...
I think we've done a great job at limiting the firearms in our society. They are machines designed to kill and not toys. Handing them out to civilians just like that makes no sense. There's barely any scenario ever where a civilian was able to prevent a terrorist incident by using his firearm...
Being at war does not justify the killing of innocents and destruction of religious sites (from the Prophet PBUH's last sermon). Don't know where you read that it's allowed in Islam. And even if it was can you think of anything more disgraceful than to plunder and loot them ? It is most...
A man who killed people of other faiths and pillaged their worshipping sites (doesn't sound very Islamic to me) is being glorified in this thread. And the funny thing is that the lot I'm seeing here appreciating his acts are also the ones who repeatedly condemn (as it should be) the violence...
By accepted if you mean them being restricted to a life of dancing and prostitution then that's no acceptance at all. Accepting would be integrating as any other non-trans person.
He'd get rid of it completely. Personally I think marriage in Pakistan is becoming a bit of a joke. It's more a financial transaction than a union of two people now.
What kind of a degenerate do you need to be that instead of staying within your boundaries in a host country you're instead trying to impose dominance that too on the same people assigned to protect you.
Because we must take small steps first. Not everyone is ready or accepting of transgenders as of yet. We need to have society be accepting of them first and only then will people allow them to be integrated completely.
Instead of discussion of the actual issue most users here have resorted to whataboutism and slinging mud at each others countries. As if that will solve the epidemic in both countries. Pathetic really. But it's the same old names so there's no real surprise.
Laid ? Buddy I'm the one advocating against social stigmatization of your sister and mother (because you're too much of pussy to do it). I'd say I'm due a thanks but it seems you have something else on your mind entirely....
And now you're literally parroting the same thing I said 3 posts ago...
Stop flip flopping every other post. You're complaining about women having gender biases by negating a movement that is against gender biases in the first place. Hell feminism will probably do us good because if anything it'll lower the expectations placed on men because women will no more be...
A funny practice I see at times here is the tampering of the nikkah nama (granted I've only seen it two or three times).Maulvi Sahab decides that certain conditions of the nikkah nama need to be "erased" so after reading out the conditions to the bride and groom (as he is legally required to do...
Bro you are making no sense at all. Having a natural inclination towards something has nothing to do with equality. If you like woman A more than woman B then does that mean you're oppressing woman A ? You are favouring woman A because of desirable traits and not because she's some another...
Uhhh what ?
You're trying to negate the concept of human equality by drawing in the concept of human tendency to be drawn to a more favourable mate.
What are YOU even arguing about ? Both of these concepts are miles apart.
Hmmm no. It doesn't work like that.
Your "fact" that women don't marry men "lower" than her isn't even logically possible. This would imply that there is a huge imbalance in marital status between the two sexes but pick any country's statistics (even the western ones) and you'll see that there...