In this scenario,
Have the Russians been granted the right to be there and have their own state there by the UN (and the League of nations prior to that)? Do they have deeply rooted historical reasons to be there? Is there a high security risk for them if they integrate into Britain? Have they...
They are not, but they will still try. Which cannot be allowed.
So killing a few Israelis is okay and Israel doesn't have a right to go after those attacking their civilians?
Cluster bombs are often to used to target launch sites, they are very good at that as they cover more ground than...
So why can't any intelligence agency operate inside Iran? Because they were trained by a few of our agencies a long time ago? They wouldn't have been trained in anywhere near all of our methods anyway not to mention that the methods of ours they did know will have been adapted since then. Things...
Not gonna happen, nor should it. Not to mention that they seem to want ToT as well, as shown by the quote below.
We feel that if the technology is transferred to Pakistan
I shall gladly share details in PM's even, but not on the open forum.
Now, yes Israel does have justification. They have been attacked with rockets consistently for long enough by anyone's standard to justify striking back. They needed to not just strike at the terrorist infrastructure but...
Hmmm.... we need to bomb Iran back to the stone age or else the evil terrorists will overrun all of our countries and destroy our beloved international Zionism!!! (How was that?;))
The F35 will probably be the 2nd or 3rd best A-A fighter out there for some time, not to mention all the other capabilities it brings to the table.
We (Britain) does not need the F22, it does not fit in with what we are looking for. While the F35 does. Not to mention the massive cost and if...
In that case Pakistan had every right to defend itself.
When did I say that?
I don't see what religion has to do with any of this, I am talking about states not religious groups.
Now that just takes the biscuit, you are suggesting that I am a piece of Nazi scum. Most of my families...
Don't see what they have to do with this but yes.
Who is preaching for Iran's destruction?
Why would the US invade Iran? Bombing the c*ap out of them would be a lot easier. Yes conventionally we (Western forces) could roll all over Iran's military but we would be faced with a massive...
I mentioned pre-emptive, conventional strikes that could have prevented any nuclear stand off in the future. Iran wouldn't use the nukes itself, but some dodgy people may get their hands on one, (Iran hasn't got a very good track record as far as supplying terrorists goes), and one would be all...
When a country preaches for the complete and utter destruction of another and is closing on acquiring weapons that would allow them to do just that do you not think that the nation being threatened has a right to defend itself pre-emptively?
I think the window for successful (major damage to nuclear facilities and large push back of the program) strikes has passed more or less. They can still strike now but it will not do nearly as much damage or set Iran back nearly as far as if they had struck earlier.
In my humble opinion they...
If I was the leader of some poor country that needed a few decent helicopters for utility use I would seriously look in the Dhruv myself. Its cheap and good value for money and the Indians would really not want to mess up the deal and so I would be almost guaranteed to get a good deal and...
You lot can have your Sharia lark, but if someone tries to put it in place around my parts they are going to have a fight on their hands. Mind you that goes for any religion trying to force its teachings on me. (I'm agnostic in case you can't guess)
India may be footing half the bill, but it is still Russian tech and is controlled solely by them. You can't expect them to surrender some control of it.