Search results

I think its just a generic picture because according to: GlobalSecurity - Pakistan - F-16 Sounds like a long time to spend just flight-testing a new F-16.

Thank you. Actually you're wrong on several points. The senior members don't say anything of the sort. The existence of J-10B is confirmed (just one of many sources: New J-10 variant sighted). Nobody is talking like that at all. The PAF did want to integrate Western avionics and radar, but the...

You don't know a single thing about J-10B except what it looks like, so your claim proves you're typing trash. If that helps you sleep better, keep believing that. The reality is that you can't accept the mki is still just an upgraded flanker and the JF-17 was developed to be capable of...

Next you will say F-22 needs a new radar to match mki.

The author of the article I posted (http://usmanansari.com/id40.html), Usman Ansari, is just as well placed as the Australian author; he cites two officers of the ISPR and soldiers/officers of a PA armoured division. You are dismissing it simply because it is written by a Pakistani? An open...

It's not a "fanboy reference", believe what you like. As of now the PAF have no BVR AAMs too, right?

Inshallah MK sahib will be fully recovered soon.

According to those with inside contacts, the PAF has had an AWACS killer for years - and it is not a SAM.

They accepted it because it is a quality product that does its job properly, not simply because it is "indigenous".

According to Usman Ansari's article, "The T-80UD in Pakistani Service." (an edited version of this article appeared in the May 2008 issue of Military Machines International):

What does the speaker say in the second video at around 2:25? First he says the software for the HUD in the F-7P was all written by the PAF. Then he says that the PAF have also helped China with HUD software, right? What does he say about the ECM at 3:23? At 4:18 we see the body panels on...

KC-135 is just a modified Boing 707. The PAF has operated 3 of these since 1986, 2 as cargo aircraft and the third as a VIP transport aircraft. They were even thinking of converting the cargo aircraft to aerial refuelling tankers according to an Air International article from 1987.

I never said Indian MiG-29s are unable to stop a pre-emptive strike, I said the PAF strike fighters would be launching large numbers of precision-guided stand-off weapons from within their own airspace. Those MiGs would be forced to come into PAF territory to stop them. I reckon the PAF would...

I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings. Facts can do that sometimes. Please find a better put-down, that one is pretty lame. I don't know about satellite killers, but you'd be surprised at what the PAF have. I don't think those satellites would be used to find jets taking off from runways, I reckon...

Indian radars? I'm sure the PAF refers to those as targets for its precision guided stand-off weaponry.

That website is trash, not a source. If the above event happened, why didn't the MiG fire? After all, according to you and your ilk, the PAF would have been "helpless" in the face of such "superior" foes. Firstly, if I remember correctly, the InAF did NOT conduct any such strikes. Why is that...

No it isn't, its too expensive to be bought in large numbers. It is just as expensive as any of the Western attack choppers. I wouldn't complain if it is chosen, but WZ-10 (with Western avionics and weaponry if necessary) is the ideal choice if you look at cost effectiveness.

According to several insiders, in the 90s (possibly 2000s also) the PAF operated a squadron of MiG-29s as "aggressors", acquired from Ukraine along with supplies of spare parts.

From: Pakistan Military Consortium :: www.PakDef.info "This aircraft is preserved outside the elite Combat Commanders School (CCS) at Sargodha AB. The aircraft is said to have been retired prematurely due to a pilot pulling very high G's during one manoeuvre and 'bending' it!" [Picture...

Typical behaviour of the Indian trolls around here.