WRONG! The waters was part of the Chinese EEZ but it is NOT Chinese territorial waters nor even close to it. The Chinese have NO jurisdiction on any military traffic through the EEZ.
Oh Horse Puckey. Chinese fishing boats and scientific ships regularly get close to American battle groups...
Zraver,
RAND's estimates are based partly on PPP and partly on capital costs. Russia does not accept payment in PPP dollars. Also, if memory serves, the DoD estimates does not include PPP but based on capital projection of a 5 SSBN/100 ICBM program as well as modernizing all current Army...
UFOs exist because they're UNIDENTIFIED. If they're flying saucers with little green men from Mars, then they would be IDENTIFIED.
If you're talking about a cover up, believe me, we ain't that good.
Hehehehehahahahhahahahahahahahahahahaha *** wipes tear from eye ***
Hehehehehahahahhahahahahahahahahahahaha Ahh that's a good one
Hehehehehahahahhahahahahahahahahahahaha, a UN suit actually got the balls to write something derogatory about anything? Koffi...
It's not blackmail. The mental game is played through exhaustion, sleep deprivation, and threats to others. "If you don't do what I want, I'll stick this hot glowing steel rod up her/his ..."
Stick to the subject which is a ballastic missile hitting a moving target by whatever machination you care to put it, none of which happened.. You're jumping all over the place with desperate attempts to attached various but seperate events that has nothing to do with the subject at hand...
Oh come on! As discussed, the re-entry alone will blind the IR ... and again, no one in China is stating this. And I am well aware of the Taiwan sources, they are the same ones who touted the PLAAF getting the BACKFIREs and MiG-31s.
Look! Even China has said NOTHING about this idea of a BM hitting a carrier. The only people touting this idea are internet warriors. There has been no proof of concept, no technology demonstrator, hell, the Chinese have not even put up a mock display of the thing.
This is still all BS and what...
Apparently I recalled wrong. There was no notification of this specific test since the SRF denied it happened. I've tried to find corresponding evidence of this test but all get traced back to Bill Gertz at the Washington Times.
Though I know Gertz does have access to some inside intel, the...
Actually, it's not that big and I suspect that this is a mere prototype with a much bigger lens in the production model so that it can look in from 1000 metres away.
You would see it if only against an open sky daylight background. It would not be readily visible when set against a building...
How old are you? Not being flippant but do you even know what the Soviets committed in order to destroy a carrier? And we are talking about smart weapons. BACKFIREs and BADGERs were to launch guided missiles onto the carrier. They were to get within range of the carrier some 100 miles to try to...
That's the whole point. You cannot have pinpoint accuracy when you don't know where your target is going to be. If I know that the carrier will be at point x at time t, I can hit it right now ... without the use of any AI or even a computer. I can just use my charts and a slide rule. Might take...
What amazes me that you're trying to extend a limited AI that has all the data within reach to the battle field where the Americans would be actively blinding anything and everything. And where their movements will not be known.
Again, pure speculation on your part that this thing even have a...
After talking to my PoW course instructors, women are alot easier to break than men. Very few women have the lone wolf complex and those who do rarely have the physical attributes to make it into the armed services and the few who does have it do not have it anywhere near what men process.