What's new

Search results

  1. T

    British should have granted "Khalistan" to Sikhs in '47!

    Question is not whether is was bad attempt or executed well. Question is: Are Sikh persecuted as evidenced by Op BS ? My answer is no. If you say that you are persecuted because force is used in a shrine to flush out evil, then it has been done in the past, and I gave the example.
  2. T

    British should have granted "Khalistan" to Sikhs in '47!

    you should do your research, before venturing out with opinions. Please see post 43, which started this side thread.
  3. T

    British should have granted "Khalistan" to Sikhs in '47!

    not really , they took refuge in the sanctum sanctorum which unfortunaly was under fire. Okay even so.. maybe that operation was done like a charm (because the terrorsits did not have years to stock up food and ammo), and even if Blue Star was not well executed, that still does not mean that...
  4. T

    British should have granted "Khalistan" to Sikhs in '47!

    Question is not baseless.. please see title of thread. and follow other posts by pakistanis and chinese regarding severing india. So its only vendetta and not out of love for the people who live in different regions in india? I know for a fact that india's policy towards pakistan is not...
  5. T

    British should have granted "Khalistan" to Sikhs in '47!

    they were extremely well armed and stocked with rations and had hostages inside the golden temple. armymen went in without shoes. Bhindranwale fired at Indian forces from within the sanctum sanctorum. They were the first ones to fire inspite of orders to surrender. I dont know how else the...
  6. T

    British should have granted "Khalistan" to Sikhs in '47!

    I have utmost respect for kaaba/vatican/harmandar sahib. It is not flame. Someone pointed out a link to operation Bluestar as to why sikhs are persecuted in india. I just wanted to show that Op BLuStar was not meant to denigrate Sikhs
  7. T

    British should have granted "Khalistan" to Sikhs in '47!

    My point is: people are pointing that Sikhs are religiously persecuted in india and show example of operation blue star. I just want to show that it is not uncommon for terrorsit to hide in holy shrines and take refuge, and when that is the case , force has to be used. NOTHING I said has ANY...
  8. T

    British should have granted "Khalistan" to Sikhs in '47!

    Grand Mosque Seizure - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This has been done before. But that was not my point as to how big the place is. My point is , if there are criminals hiding there, force would for be used. please see the link for your answer.
  9. T

    British should have granted "Khalistan" to Sikhs in '47!

    I am not venturing into unknown territories, I want the answer from your own mouth. If those guys were executed, I am sure you will more than agree that operation Blue star was necessary to flush out terrorism. What I agree is not acceptable was indira's assassination AND the massacre of Sikhs...
  10. T

    British should have granted "Khalistan" to Sikhs in '47!

    Also, a lot of people here want to split india into many pieces. May I ask what is the advantage to Pakistan if that happens? If that happens there will be some of those small countries which will be more propsperous that it is now because they are more progressive minded (Like the southern...
  11. T

    British should have granted "Khalistan" to Sikhs in '47!

    what will the saudi govt do, if osama is sitting inside the Kaaba and has stored weapons and men there, and is conducting terrorist operatinos from there? I DO NOT mean to insult anyone, this is just an analogy. Just for a moment let us assume the saudi king is non-muslim. this is exactly the...
  12. T

    British should have granted "Khalistan" to Sikhs in '47!

    whats the use of having a homeland. Imagine for a minute, that kashmir is a separate country and so is khalistan, and any other state of india you would like to split. what will happen, these will be rules by some tyrannical despot or will become an islamic wasteland. Now the very people who say...
  13. T

    British should have granted "Khalistan" to Sikhs in '47!

    whats the use of being a muslim nation. Look at saudi.. the king is a vassal of america. first he bows to white house and then at kaaba, otherwise its the end of the house of saud. look at any other muslim nation. Filled with angry people, people very frustrated because of their inability to...
  14. T

    British should have granted "Khalistan" to Sikhs in '47!

    I agree, present day Punjab province in Pakistan was once Sikh majority. So a regoin carved out of Pakistani Punjab with Lahore as capital should have been given to Sikhs. After all Lahore was Maharaj Ranjit Singh's capital. For Sikhs remaining in India they could be given a state within union...
  15. T

    Karachi's Bun Kebabs

    i havent tried, but do try morarji cola :yahoo:
  16. T

    Karachi's Bun Kebabs

    yaar, firangi jeene ke liye khate hain.. par hum khaane ke liye jeete hain.. so dont compare
  17. T

    Karachi's Bun Kebabs

    I dont know if its only me, but do any of you look at your food and talk to it before eating it?
  18. T

    Karachi's Bun Kebabs

    oi.. i had asked, if there is any pakistani Vegetarian speciality ? and also if chaats are famous there
  19. T

    Karachi's Bun Kebabs

    But italian food has been desi since 2004, when sonia gandhi won the elections in india ... hahaha. LOL
  20. T

    Karachi's Bun Kebabs

    yea ketchup is a bad american thing that screws up everything.
Back
Top Bottom