But even if it was a million years ago, the mosque was still built on Krishna's birthplace.
Scenario:
1. What if the British occupied Saudi Arabia destroyed mecca and built a church
2. during their occupation 40% of Saudi Arabia converted to Christianity.
3. After 200 years the British leave...
The people who run the mosque should just allow Hindus to worship there. Then there will be no argument. It will be a mosque marking the spot where Krishna was born.... all Hindu brothers will have access and can pray as they wish as can the Muslim brothers (and sisters of course)
BTW I'm not a Hindu.
Its not the mosque.... its the actual spot that is in dispute. That was where Krishna was born.
Then allow Hindu to worship Krishna in the mosque.
So move them. We live in the 21st century where there are trucks and hydraulic jacks. They moved tons of egyptian ruins during the Aswan Dam construction.
With modern technology anything can be moved and improved.
Or we can build a much larger and newer mosque a little out of the way to...
Why is it victory. Its correcting a historic wrong... like giving East Jerusalem back to the Palestinians or freeing Kashmir.
That mosque was build in 1644, Kashmir stuff started in 1846. Is really not that different in terms of time scale.
btw. The temples of Pakistan are your responsibility.
In today's west the women's movement, lgbqt and equality movements are very strong. Any comment like this from the leader of a patriarchal state will make Pakistan look backwards and further the rift between it and the west.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/eu-chief-surprised-by-seat-snub-during-meeting-with-turkish-president-1.5377582
More misogynistic behaviour from Muslim leaderz