Search results

1. You will never remain just defenders . Once there has been a strike from IAF , PAF will retaliate. PAF will face the same ground attack and Anti-aircraft missiles like IAF . 2. Both PAF and IAF have BVR capabilities so leave it to actual battle. 3. If you see the history , its filled with...

If you say Soviet pilots were not good , you are biased . Give them some respect , for they have achieved milestone in air and space technologies when you and me were not even born. Secondly , as i already said , US had much smarter weapons . US created its hardware keeping Soviets in sight (...

American , you got me wrong . I was talking about range of flight . When we talk about range , common sense tells us that it should be range of flight and not range of Radar ( unless stated )

1. Planes dont fight , pilots fight . All the instances you have mentioned are when inexperinced pilots from thirld world countries like IRAQ were gunned down by highly experinced US pilots . Those US pilots were using AWACS also which IRAQIs didnot have . Had it been erstwhile Soviet UNION and...

Well :- 1. Adding additional hardwares never means lack of confidence. 2. Strike packages would be sent depending on resources in hand . Not to mention that IAF would be fully aware of the readiness of PAF and what to expect . 3. Numerical superiority is not a match -winner but it does...

The Shaheen-2 would be blown up in atmosphere if it takes that much time to reach East India. But let me assure you that after this act , the barrage of Prithvi and Agni would do in-comparable damage within 11 minutes. If i am wrong , then please enlighten me.

While what you just wrote may point to some weaknesses in SU 30 -MKI but lets consider following points :- 1. SU-30 will not be alone . There would be multirole fighters like RAFALE , MIG-29s and Mirage -2000s who can match any ability of the advanced f-16s or f-18s . So if you are going for...

While J-10 seems to be an efficient plane and may be it can match F-18 and mig-29 , but the dogfight depends on the skills of the pilot. The plane is as better as its pilot.

Now this is what i call an unbiased explanation. Thanks .

This is not the right question to ask at this moment. Shutup for a while.

yours was a very cheap reply. Do you have something logical or intelligent to share.....??

Putting stupid smileys will not help....this task suits girls .......now coming to the point.....If there has been a claim then definately there has been some work.....its better that you people start accepting the facts than live in the same falsehood which you have been living since long time.

Is copying a testament of advancement ? Well there are some countries which are known for their "copying" and never creating a geniune technology . I think you guessed it now. You are preoccupied with a senseless prejudice.....Time to see and face that other countries can also work hard and...

Dont know what was "cheap" here ? This above mentioned post was full of facts . Perhaps the post has hurt your false pride.

Good explanation....just one question....wasnot INSAS inducted into IA in 90s ?.....if it was existing for 35 years ....why there was such a delay......i think you meant that research on INSAS started 35 yrs back .

A dead enemy is much better than a wounded enemy ...or should i say .. a wounded enemy pose a bigger threat ...because he has been hit and will put 200% effort to hit you by whatever means.

Disagree here also ......its a proven fact that 7.62 travels more (500-800 meters) while 5.56 is (300-500 meters)....also because of higher mass , 7.62 will have more power and more K.E.

I disagree..... while your equation is right .....but 5.56 is 11 gm while 7.62 is 18 gm ....so Force (F) would be higher and thus the K.E would be higher .....thus more penetration power.

Don't know why this idea came to your mind ....anyways .....i was thinking that from a large distance ....7.62 might prove a fatal shot while 5.56 may just inflict injury.....