As I said, come back when you have proof rather than being an armchair analyst.
PTI's return to Parliament is illegal: former CJP - The Express Tribune
Former Chief Justice: While criticising the PTI, the former CJP said in view of Article 64(1) of the Constitution, resignation of a member of...
I'm asking for proof from someone other than you. An analyst, from example. If law was to be read how it was written down, everyone would be a lawyer.
You cannot just read one line and say his is what law says. Have you even read the entire constitution?
Anyways, you've no proof and just a...
So mad.
Find yourself. I already posted a video.
@Viper0011.
Don't waste time with that girl. She's a crying doll. Just look up her post history, she uses the word "bitches" (including saying Nawaz is a bitch, against forum rules) and "assholes" like its first word she learned.
Then when...
Also where is the link to the study where it says it cost so and so for India to build per km?
I have this link: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01984.pdf It says a mile can cost $7m and upto 33m. This was back in 2001, so with inflation, it may be higher today. The study was done by US.
You're late to party.
Indeed they were, that's why Nawaz didn't take any action. Kayani was against Raheel being appointed, which is why he got appointed. A retiring COAS always wants to leave his favorite, so Nawaz knew.
They expected Nawaz to do the 90s again, but he didn't. That's what...
What personal remarks?
There was a girl who said the thing on TV. What my point was, many youngsters are attached to Imran because of charisma, rather than him being a leader. So when he says youthful things, everyone goes OMG
Raheel was not going to be fired by Nawaz. This is where Zaheer...
Do you have any proof of what you say? Of course to you no one has said, you like to read the views that fit your opinion. Confirmation bias - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Speaker will decide whether he will put forth the motion, based on the reason. Hence "may" exists. Why would he put...
Gyyyyyyyyyy
its funny she calls out childish behaviour when she's the one always mentioning mods/admins, seeking their attention.
Little kids always call mommys. Now that's childish.
Especially when Imran doesn't fully accept the result.
They should call a commission for commission lol.
Shhhh or she will call webmasters and other mods.
Apparently it's a crime to quote someone here, per her.
And don't waste time with her. She refused to read article and carried out her blab. What do you expect from container folks.
If someone doesn't attend, and he has backing of the parliament, then one can go to the court.
If JUI and MQM put forth a motion back when PTI was absent and Speaker refused to accept it, they could have gone to court. But we all know that at the point MQM was friendly towards PTI, Hoping army...
Good analysis.
General Zaheer thought that like the 90s, Nawaz will pick a fight with army. He will think Raheel is behind the dharna (there is a recording of a call where Zaheer is telling generals what Raheel had told him, but it never happened). So when Nawaz fires Raheel, the army will...
Lol if you learn to read, the article explicitly mentions that Nawaz confronted the men behind the event. And his ministers have come forward and confirmed. Now please point to where you found out that army is backing Imran Khan, because the truth is, the whole event was done to get Raheel...
Here is an article for a person who can only say crap. : Nawaz had ‘solid information’ about former ISI chief’s role in Dharna - thenews.com.pk
Also no one invited you to this thread. But you just had to comment because hey, your supreme dear eternal leader's party was mentioned.
So when you...
You
you hate anything that doesn't say positive things about PTI.
Just want to further add, Nawaz sharif have won the battle completely. If he opens commission, then the junior officers who worked under these people (who are now senior), will portray Nawaz as taking revenge and among the army...
Alright so for the next 1000 years, every party can continue to do it because everyone had done it before.
It's not just 1000 billion rupees. I think it's around 300-500. But over the decades, it turns to tens of billions because the losses are compounding. You'll never get them back ever...