Search results

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_trading_partners_of_China

in bold, please stop. china has a trade surplus of 1.2 TRILLION dollars with the world so you need to lay to rest the fantasy that china economy is driven by domestic force. china economy is totally dependent on export and its trade surplus no but or if or whatsoever about it. take away the...

That is a myth. The American living standard has been poorer since the early 1990's due to American losing 20 million direct and indirect manufacturing jobs to China and virtually every manufacturing companies (which the exception of high tech manufacturers) have closed down. Cheaper Chinese...

but according to Chinese logic, losing $400 billion of trade surplus with a big appetite customer like the U.S is different because they can find someone (like north korea) to replace the U.S market, right?

The U.S sail and fly up and down the SCS into the Paracels and Spratly with impunity; that's the difference between the U.S Navy and chinese navy. The U.S navy can bring an armada to the Chinese coast while the Chinese navy is not capable of doing so to the U.S. Like I have said, the Chinese...

this s-400 obviously is not meant for Pakistan; S-400 for Pakistan is overkill. S-400 is geared more toward a country with an air force like china.

Hey retard. The article was written by two chinese with nothing to back up other than words. If the u.s has a trade surplus like these journalists claim, why would the us sabotage this trade surplus? Think, moron

where is your deutsche bank report, retard? If you don't have the data, your claim is just cheap talk like those journalist and the U.S will keep hitting you with tariff.

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/global-manufacturing.html

of course the annual interest rate is zero because the Japanese jack up the principal by 10 times.

Of course I don't expect a retard like you to back up your claim with anything. The only thing you have is a news article written by two journalist (one is a Chinese) claiming that the U.S have a trade surplus with china and the world LOL. Should I remind you that your leadership is wetting...

How much? Not much considering the U.S have to give $400 billion of giving free cash to china every year just to appease ...McDonald. That's why the U.S won't give a fuking French about initiating this trade war while china has to go sue the U.S with the WTO. lol

The u.s can tax on 500 billion of chinese goods while the chinese can only tax 150 billion of American goods. I'm ok with that

In bold, obviously you have not even taken economics 101 YET. The multiplier effect is a BASIC knowledge for anyone who has taken an economics course. When you spend a dollar, that dollar become someone's income (do you even know this???), and so on...this is elementary economics...

Obviously u have not taken any economics class. The riple effect of losing 400 billion of trade surplus means that your economy will lose 2 trillions if we take the multiplier effect of spending 80% and saving 20% for 1 dollar of trade surplus china earns. Welcome to the reality of losing 2...

Not according to china. Stronk. Without the u.s powerful consumer market giving them 400 billion a year of trade surplus, their economy will revert back to the pre 1990s....hopelessly trying to find any client who can give them free cash of 400 billion a year like the u.s

Germany has an annual trade surplus of $70 BILLION usd with the U.S, while badmouthing the U.S at the same time. Are you expecting the U.S to give Germany $70 billion dollars of free money every year?

I already said this the chinese have to be evicted out of BOTH the paracels and spartlys. If they r still controlling these two archipelagos they will use them as a base to launch their ships n planes to harass their neighbors for now n international ships in the future.

Nihon Kaigun still controlling the senkakus, which is thousand of km away from Japan's mainland.....

relax, malaysia doesn't believe china will grab any of malay's spratly holdings hence no need for an af