Search results

My lingering fears about this forums credibility, independence and reliability have proven correct. Unfortunately my time here is now done. No more posts or replies from here on. Audios Amigos!

Mossad, RUSSIAN, Chinese, EU agencies maybe but certainly limited with our own ISI.

AWC developed an SDB for the Burraq. I have no idea what happened to it afterwards

Are your serious? Can you tell me the names of the head of the Chinese Nuclear or Missile Program or the one heading the US or Russian Nuclear or missile programs?

I am sitting in the northern areas supervising the agriculture here. I think issuing such statements of 'success of all parameters tested' or having a group photograph in front of the missile of 'all the important persons related to the program' for the global intelligence agencies to gather...

Has anyone seen visuals of the missile hitting its intended target in the Arabian Sea? Just asking because my trust on these official statements is generally low to the same level as PTV when it tells you the same wet weather conditions in Malakamd Division for the last 50 years

That is simply asking too much! As long as it’s being run by serving Army officers it’ll continue to decline in potential and capability. Lost opportunities include, APCs, IED protection Vehicles (needed severely by our troops), indigenous tank etc

Your first line in your comment is the reason enough to which my subject post referred.

Simple! Chinese were cheaper and Turks did not want to give further credit/ grant to PA to buy theirs but most importantly, Turkish UCAVs have US and EU avionics and systems integrated which cannot be exported to Pakistan. Just like the Turk Attack Heli deal

Trying to keep old Artillery Foxy's (VW Beetle) operational really! HIT itself needs a major overhaul for its long term survival

یہ ٹرک کی بتی ابھی تک ان ہے؟

ارے بھائ یہ والا پہلے اڑانا تو سیکھ لیں ۔ یہ ونگ لونگ والا جہاز ہمارے لیے اڑانا مشکل ہے جناب ۔ ایک ونگ لونگ جو ائ ایس ائ کے پاس ہے اسے بھی ہمارے چینی بھائ ہی اڑاتے ہیں یہاں ا کر۔

CH5 costs a lot more. Better to buy the cheaper CH4 first, get comfortable in flying and than if needed go for upgraded models.

CH-4 because of its cheaper price comparatively and par Performance PAF has crashed many FALCO AVs in the past until such time LEONARDO the manufacturer refused to provide them with free replacement AVs. Today they simply do not have the money to make them locally

PAF wrote the obituary of FALCO UAV sometime ago. RIP million’s of dollars wasted

CH-4 for Pakistan Navy are on the way as well

Fake News Unfortunately

There is no Wing Lloong Deal. The only Wing Loong is operated by the ISI in Pakistan

I think they have purchased 5 AVs and associated hardware

The UCAV System CH-4 ordered by Pakistan Army has finally arrived last week in Pakistan and currently in process of transportation to an aviation base in Khanewal presumably Hopefully this will alleviate load on PAF jets deployed for Army IBO or anti terrorist ops near the Afghanistan Border