haha simply tell me what are you trying to show saying jf 17 is based on MIG-21 ?
design not indigenous?
does not change fact that LCA's design is also not indigenous..
poor design?
sorry kid,with this design jf 17 gets manuveribility on par with F-16A,a hell alot better than LCA that...
so by your logic hence all the missiles are that kinda crap based on old V2s since they own their existance to it...LOL!
what you guys want to show if jf 17's base was saber-II or super 7 ?
oh..imagine..indians will be doing the same propoganda after jf 17 block III is produced with 4.5...
- no i dont say that block I standard is more maneuverable than LCA MK-1...but as of now yes jf 17 is MORE MANEUVERABLE...thats for sure..
dry TWR and lower wingloading:-
does A BIT HIGHER TWR (supposition) helps LCA to be better in WVR with a ristricted AoA and the G-LIMIT ?
ahh..please i think...
PAC webiste has not been updated since long..
what makes you adamant,after the official chart shown in IZMIR..
oh wait..watch this...carefully...this sums up...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7tuiaeS_kc