In retrospect, it was a bad decision. In the words of Donald Trump, "Saddam was a b*stard, but he was our b*stard". If we wanted him gone, we should have made sure the transition was smooth instead of leaving Iraq to their own devices afterwards.
If course we support Israel to an extent, as in they have the right to defend themselves but not to create settlements.
Anyway, my point was that when you oppress people, they get a little extreme.
English, not Indian. Do I have to say it a 3rd time before you understand?
I would assume Pakistan is already trying to purge Baluchistan of militants then, as CPEC goes through there. Give it some time. Pakistan can surely do it themselves, getting Iranian help would make them look weak.
Against Iran and Pakistan cooperating at such a level. It will not only anger the Arabs, but also NATO. Pakistan's interests are to keep ties with Iran at a minimum.
The majority of Kashmir clearly wants independence, and when you oppress people you will naturally get extremists. Just look at Ireland or Palestine.
North Korea is a democracy, but not exactly a true one as the only option is Kim. And the UK is most certainly a democracy, the monarchy has no...
Come on man, would you appreciate it if they said the same about IDF soldiers?
I would assume Pakistan is against this because it would ruin Pak-Arab relations.
So India's interest is to be a ruthless oppressor?
That doesn't make my statement false.
The Royal Family can't do sh*t. They aren't even allowed to express their political views, they only exist because the government lets them. You clearly don't know the UK.
Laugh all you want, but the...
Pounding our positions? If India touched the UK you would be deleted from the planet and we wouldn't have a 2nd thought.
As for Kargil, Pakistan still occupy's point 5353, clearly proving that it was the US's persuasion that forced a retreat, not India's military.